ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: LEGAL STANCES OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

The article is devoted to the analysis of the stances developed in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the content, scope, general principles of ensuring the right of access to justice, and permissible limits applied to restrict the right in question. The author has substantiated the conclusion that the European Court of Human Rights associates access to justice with Paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Thus, the concept of access to justice includes a number of elements: the right to have recourse to court; the right to have a case heard and resolved in compliance with the requirements of a fair trial; the right to have the judgment enforced; the set of safeguards that allow the person to exercise the rights under consideration effectively. According to the European Court of Human Rights, access to justice should be ensured at all stages including pre-trial (criminal) proceedings and reviewing of court decisions by higher courts. However, the right of access to justice is not absolute. The restrictions imposed must have a legitimate purpose and reasonable proportionality must be obtained between the means used and the goal determined. In view of the requirement mentioned above, the national legislation may provide for the particularities of application of Paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the Convention to proceedings in different types of courts and at different stages, for example, by establishing a certain procedure for the court to grant individuals the right to appeal to a higher court. The author has demonstrated the main directions of applying the legal stances of the European Court of Human Rights regarding access to justice to improve the Russian criminal procedural legislation and law enforcement practices, as well as for further scientific research.

1. Antonovich E. K. Otdelnye aspekty priemlemosti zhalob, postupayushchikh v Evropeyskiy Sud po pravam cheloveka [Certain aspects of admissibility of complaints submitted to the European Court of Human Rights]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel [The Russian Investigator]. 2008. No. 6. Pр. 10—14. (In Russian)

2. Vilkova T. Yu. printsipy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v sisteme printsipov natsionalnogo prava: obshchepravovoy i mezhotraslevoy aspekty [Principles of criminal procedure in the system of principles of national law: general legal and intersectoral aspects]. Moscow, Norma : Infra-M Publ., 2018. 191 p. (In Russ.)

3. Volodina L. M. Naznachenie ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i problemy ego realizatsii [The purpose of criminal proceedings and problems of its implementation]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2018. 289 p. (In Russ.)

4. Voskobitova L. A. Teoreticheskie osnovy sudebnoy vlasti [Theoretical foundations of judicial power]. Moscow, Norma : Infra-M Publ., 2019. 288 p. (In Russ.)

5. Maslennikova L. N. Obespechenie poterpevshemu ot prestupleniya dostupa k pravosudiyu v usloviyakh razvitiya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy [Ensuring access to justice for the victim of crime in the conditions of development of digital technologies]. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii [Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2019, No. 1 (49), pp. 93—98. (In Russ.)

6. Maslennikova L. N. Transformatsiya dosudebnogo proizvodstva v nachalnyy etap ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, obespechivayushchiy dostup k pravosudiyu v eru industry 4.0 [Transformation of pre-trial proceedings into the initial stage of criminal proceedings providing access to justice in the era of Industry 4.0]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Actual Problems of Russian Law]. 2019. No. 6, pp. 137— 146. (In Russ.)

7. Maslennikova L. N., Sobenin A. A. Registratsiya soobshcheniya o prestuplenii i nachalo rassledovaniya v novoy tsifrovoy realnosti [Registration of the report on the crime and the beginning of the investigation in the new digital reality]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel [The Russian Investigator]. 2019, No. 6, pp. 12—17. (In Russ.)

8. Maslennikova L. N., Sushina T. E. Optimizatsiya sudebnogo kontrolya na nachalnom etape ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v usloviyakh razvitiya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy [Optimization of judicial review at the initial stage of criminal proceedings in the conditions of development of digital technologies]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justice]. 2019, No. 3, pp. 40—44. (In Russ.)

9. Mole N., Harbi K., Alekseeva L. B. Evropeyskaya konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod. Statya 6 «Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratelstvo» : Pretsedenty i kommentarii [The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Article 6 “Right to a fair trial”: Precedents and comments]. Moscow, Rus. Academy of Justice Publ., 2001. 143 p. (In Russ.)

10. Nichiporenko A. A. Obzhalovanie sledovatelem, doznavatelem sudebnykh resheniy: ot ustava ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva 1864 g. do UPK RF [Appeals against court decisions by the investigator or the person conducting the initial inquiry: from the Charter of Criminal Proceedings of 1864 to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Actual Problems of Russian Law]. 2014. No. 11 (48), pp. 2546—2550. (In Russ.)

11. Nichiporenko A. A. Ogranicheniya na sudebnoe obzhalovanie otdelnykh vidov resheniy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Restrictions applied to judicial appeals against certain types of decisions in criminal proceedings]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2014. No. 2. Pр. 118—122. (In Russ.)

12. Nichiporenko A. A. Publichnost v nadzornom proizvodstve v ugolovnom protsesse : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. [Publicity in supervisory proceedings in criminal proceedings: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis. Moscow, 2018. 210 p. (In Russ.)

13. Panokin A. M. Realizatsiya prava na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratelstvo v apellyatsionnom proizvodstve: pravovye pozitsii Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka i rossiyskiy ugolovnyy protsess [Implementation of the right to a fair trial in appellate proceedings: legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Russian criminal procedure]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya [The Russian Justice]. 2016. No. 6. Pр. 52—54. (In Russ.)

14. Sushina T. E. Garantii realizatsii prava na dostup k pravosudiyu v stranakh Evropeyskogo Soyuza [Guarantees of realization of the right to access to justice in the countries of the European Union]. Protsessualnaya teoriya i kriminalisticheskaya praktika : materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 25—26 aprelya 2019 g., g. Simferopol-Alushta [Criminal proceedings: procedural theory and criminalistic practice: Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference, April 25—26, 2019, Simferopol- Alushta]. M. A. Mikhailov, T. V. Omelchenko (eds.), Crimean Federal University named after V. I. Vernadskiy. Simferopol, Arial Publ., 2019, pp. 122—123. (In Russ.)

15. Tabolina K. A. sozdanie edinoy mezhvedomstvennoy tsifrovoy onlayn-platformy vzaimodeystviya prokurorov i organov rassledovaniya [Creation of a single interdepartmental digital online platform for interaction of prosecutors and investigation bodies]. Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation: The Second Decade in the Service of the Fatherland (Moscow, February 7, 2019). A. M. Bagmet (ed.). Moscow, Moscow Academy of Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, 2019, pp. 357—360. (In Russ.)