Constitutional Symbolism, Modernization of the Constitution and the Information Society (between Constituent and Information Constitutionalism for Russia)

The article discusses constitutional symbolism in the theory and practice of Russian constitutionalism, the problem of constitutional modernization in the context of the Russian state and legal tradition, the nature and legal forms of the constituent power, the constitutional status and the generative possibilities of the constituent power as constituents. The paper examines scientific approaches to understanding constitutional modernization in contemporary Russian jurisprudence, the meaning of constitutional symbolism and constitution as legal, political and moral communication in modern society. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the relationship between the constitutional process and the constitutional power from the standpoint of cognitive constitutionalism and historical rationality. The author has determined the problem zones of legal registration and implemetation of powers of the constituent power in the context of the Russian constitutional development. The study has been carried out on the basis of formal-legal, concrete historical and comparative legal methods of analysis, the method of constitutional design and legal hermeneutics. The author suggests the following conclusions: 1) It is necessary to rethink the range of subjects of the right to amend and revise the Constitution in the Russian constitutional law that reflects the constitutional tradition (in comparative and historical contexts) outlined in 18th-19th centuries rather than modern capabilities of the information society and e-government (e-ruling); 2) The importance and efficiency of democratic involvement increases and requires revision of the thesis that the head of state (in the history of Russia — the monarch, emperor, president) is the only authoritative and constitutionally significant “guardian” of the Constitution rigidity and the main political and legal route of its transformation and change; 3) Legal formalization and use of legal procedures of the constitutional will and expression of the will of citizens of the country in the process of elaboration, discussion, adoption and introduction of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation (current), and in the future amount to the development and adoption of the draft new Constitution of the country; 4) In the context of Russia’s intent to join the 4th Industrial Revolution and the development of institutions of information society (including in the field of electoral procedures and the formation of information and digital constitutionalism), it is necessary to create a constitutional sector of the Internet supported by the State at the federal and regional levels for the use of information technologies and institutions of digital constitutionalism in the process of determining citizens’ opinion on opportunities, prospects, content of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, their nation-wide discussion in the Internat.

1. Avakyan SA. Proekty zakonov o popravkakh k konstitutsii rossiyskoy federatsii [Draft laws on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo [Constitutional and Municial Law]. 2013; 2:20—5. (In Russ.)

2. Baglay MV. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Infra-M, Norma Publishing; 1997. (In Russ.)

3. Komarova VV. Teoretiko-pravovye osnovy uchreditelnoy vlasti [Theoretical and legal foundations of the constituent power]. In: Ebzeev BS (ed.) Electoral democracy: Russian experience. Moscow: RCIOT Publishing; 2017. (In Russ.)

4. Kondrashev AA. Probely v Konstitutsii Rossii: ponyatie, klassifikatsiya i otgranichenie ot smezhnykh yavleniy [Gaps in the Constitution of Russia: The concept, classification and distinction from related phenomena]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Juridical Journal]. 2014;2:20—37. (In Russ.)

5. Kryazhkov VA. Popravki k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii: pravovye osnovy, predely i ikh obespechenie [Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation: Legal Framework, Limits and their Enforcement. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law]. 2016;1:5—12. (In Russ.)

6. Troitskaya AA. Rossiyskiy Konstitutsionnyy Sud i proverka popravok k Konstitutsii: kak raspakhnut priotkrytuyu dver [Russian Constitutional Court and Review of Amendments to the Constitution: How to open a half-open door]. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review]. 2016;2:96—115. (In Russ.)

7. Chirkin VE. Verna li terminologiya o prinyatii popravok k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii? [Is the terminology about the adoption of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation correct?]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo [Constitutional and Municipal Law]. 2018;2:3—7 (In Russ.)

8. Shakhray SM. Tsifrovaya konstitutsiya. Osnovnye prava i svobody lichnosti v totalno informatsionnom obshchestve [The digital constitution. Fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual in the total information society]. Vestnik RAS. 2018;88(12):1076—1077. (In Russ.)

9. Yudin Yu. Zakonodatelnaya protsedura vneseniya izmeneniy v Konstitutsiyu RF [Legislative Procedure for Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Constitutional Law: Eastern European Abstract. 1996;3(16)4(17):43—5. (In Russ.)

10. Behnke N, Benz A. The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution. Publius. 2009;39 (2): 213—40. DOI:10.1093/publius/pjn039.

11. Brubaker R. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Harvard University Press; 1992.

12. Castles S. Hierarchical Citizenship in a World of Unequal Nation-States. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2005; 38 (4): 689—92. DOI: 10.1017/S10490965050353.

13. Grimm D. Constituent Power and Limits of Constitutional Amendments. Nomos. 2016; (2): 1—8.

14. Holmes S. Constitutions and Constitutionalism. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Ed. by M. Rosenfeld & A. Sajó. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2012. DOI: 10.1093/oxford hb/9780199578610.013.0010.

15. Klein C, Sajó A. Constitution-Making: Process and Substance. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Ed. by M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajó. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2012.

16. Law DS. Globalization and the Future of Constitutional Rights. Northwestern University Law Abstract. 2008;102(3): 1277—1350.

17. Law DS, Versteeg M. The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism. California Law Abstract. 2011;99(5): 1163—1258.

18. Lindahl H. Possibility, Actuality, Rupture: Constituent Power and the Ontology of Change. Constellations. 2015;22(2): 163—174. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.12154.

19. Loughlin M. Constituent Power. The Idea of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004; Oxford Scholarship Online; 2010. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274727.003.0006.

20. Loughlin M, Walker N. (eds). The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

21. Marciano A. (ed.) Constitutional Mythologies: New Perspectives on Controlling the State. New York: SpringerVerlag; 2011: VIII. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6784—8.

22. Olson K. Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy. American Journal of Political Science. 2007;51(2): 330—343.

23. Pribán J. Legal Symbolism: on law, time and European identity. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2007.

24. Prosser T. Constitutions as communication. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2017;15(4): 1039— 1065. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox085.

25. Somek A. Constituent Power in National and Transnational Contexts. Transnational Legal Theory. 2012;3(1): 31—60.

26. Spiro P. J. Globalization and the (Foreign Affairs) Constitution. Ohio State Law Journal. 2002;63(2): 649—730.

27. Thornhill C. Contemporary constitutionalism and the dialectic of constituent power. Global Constitutionalism. 2012;1 (3): 369—404. DOI: 10.1017/S2045381712000159.