Improving the Legal Framework for Social Partnership in the Eurasian Economic Union States under International Labor Standards

In the paper, the author examines the legal mechanism of social partnership in the States of the Eurasian Economic Union for compliance with international labor standards. The status of ratification of the ILO conventions in the field of social partnership in the EAEU Member States is defined, and a brief description of international standards in the exercise of the right to freedom of association, the institution of employee representation, and the implementation of forms of social partnership is given. The author concludes that some approaches to the legislative regulation of collective labor relations differ from international standards, and in some cases contradict them. Based on the analysis of labor legislation, gaps and conflicts in the regulation of collective bargaining procedures, mutual consultations and exchange of information, as well as ensuring the right to freedom of association and representation of employees in social partnership are identified. There is no uniformity in the definition and regulation of forms of social partnership in the EAEU States. The legislation of the EAEU States is characterized by heterogeneous conditions for conducting consultations: in some countries, this form of social partnership is implemented through the mechanism of coordination of important decisions and acts of the employer (Belarus, Kyrgyzstan) with employees’ representatives, in others through the mechanism of taking into account the opinion of the representative body of employees (Kazakhstan, Russia). In Armenia, the labor legislation does not provide for a counselling mechanism. The national legislation of a number of States contains rules that violate the right to freedom of association. The Committee of experts on the application of ILO conventions and recommendations has repeatedly noted this in its reports and recommendations. The author formulates recommendations for improving the legal framework of social partnership in the EAEU States in order to implement international obligations. In particular, it is recommended that the legislation of the EAEU States provide for a more systematic and clear mechanism for regular exchange of information between employees and the employer and their representatives as an independent form of social partnership.

social dialogue, international labour standards, ILO, social partnership, labour legislation, EAEU, freedom of association, collective bargaining, collective agreement, consultation, information, trade union

1. Lyutov NL (ed.). Aktualnye problemy trudovogo prava: uchebnik dlya magistrov [Current problems of labor law : a textbook for a Master degree students]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2018. (In Russ.).

2. Lushnikova MV, Ramankulov KS, Tomashevskiy KL (eds.). Evraziyskoe trudovoe pravo: uchebnik [Eurasian labor law: A textbook]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2017. (In Russ.).

3. Kazakov SO. Osnovnye formy sotsialnogo partnerstva v Rossii i Germanii: sravnitelno-pravovoy analiz [Basic forms of social partnership in Russia and Germany: Comparative legal analysis. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017. (In Russ.).

4. Lobacheva EA. Korporativnyy kapitalizm i evolyutsiya tripartizma: dis. ... kand. polit. nauk [Corporate capitalism and the evolution of tripartism: Candidate degree thesis (political sciences)]. St. Petersburg; 2011. (In Russ.).

5. Golovina SYu, Lyutov NL (eds.). Mezhdunarodnye trudovye standarty i rossiyskoe trudovoe pravo: perspektivy koordinatsii: monografiya [International labor standards and Russian labor law: prospects for coordination: monograph]. Moscow: Norma, Infra-M Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

6. Natsionalnyy trekhstoronniy sotsialnyy dialog: rukovodstvo MOT po effektivnomu upravleniyu [National tripartite social dialogue: ILO guide to good governance]. Gruppa tekhnicheskoy podderzhki po voprosam dostoynogo truda i byuro MOT dlya stran Vostochnoy Evropy i Tsentralnoy Azii [Decent work technical support group and ILO Bureau for Eastern Europe and Central Asia]. Moscow: ILO; 2014. (In Russ.).

7. Nurgalieva EN. Rol kazakhstanskikh profsoyuzov v obespechenii sotsialnoy stabilnosti v obshchestve [The role of Kazakhstan’s trade unions in ensuring social stability in society]. In: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii "Za prava trudyashchikhsya. K 110-letiyu profsoyuznogo dvizheniya v Rossii" [Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference "For the Rights of Workers. For the 110th Anniversary of the Trade Union Movement in Russia"]. Ekaterinburg; 2015. p.116-118. (In Russ.).

8. Gerasimova ES, Ostrovskaya YuE, Bizyukov PV. Svoboda obedineniya v sovremennoy Rossii: praktika, problemy, opyt zashchity: monografiya [Freedom of association in modern Russia: practice, problems, experience of protection: monograph]. Gerasimova ES, Ostrovskaya YuE (eds.). Moscow: Tsentr sotsialno-trudovykh prav Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).

9. Svoboda obedineniya: sbornik resheniy, prinyatykh Komitetom po svobode obedineniya administrativnogo soveta MOT, i vyrabotannykh im printsipov [Freedom of association: Collection of decisions adopted by the Committee on freedom of association of the ILO Administrative Council and its principles]. Mezhdunarodnoe byuro truda [International labour office]. 5th ed. Geneva: MBT; 2016. (In Russ.).