Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Do We Need a Criminalistic Characterization of a Crime in the Criminalistic Methodology?

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.160.3.055-069

Abstract

The paper deals with the essence of criminalistic characterization of the crime, its necessity and role in the criminalistic methodology. The attitude of the scientific community to this scientific category for half a century of its existence has undergone dramatic changes: from enthusiastic exaltation as a universal means of solving crimes to a useless “phantom” of criminalistics. However, despite criticism from a number of highly eminent scholars, criminalistic characterization of the crime has not disappeared from academic intercourse and has firmly enshrined its role in criminalistic methodology. The paradox is explained by its systemic need in the arsenal of this section of criminalistics. As the only acceptable indication of the empirical knowledge of the crime and the ways of its disclosure developed by criminalistics, the criminalistic characterization of the crime not only amounts to core of individual forensic techniques, but also defines the structure of the entire forensic methodology as a branch of the science. Attempting to abandon it leads to the emergence of various substitutes that are similar in content, but less successful with regard to terms. For these reasons, the criminalistic characterization of a crime cannot be rejected by forensics despite any criticism. It seems that the “phantom” is not the very idea of criminalistic characterization of the crime, but the method by which it was “filled.” A systematically necessary and successfully named design was unsuccessfully methodologically connected by its creators with statistical measurements of correlation dependencies between the main criminalistically significant elements of a crime. However, such measurements are unsuitable for a specific investigative methodology. The “filling” of criminalistic characterization with relevant information concerning criminal activity should be provided by the totality of methods available for empirical sciences without being limited to statistical measurements of the links between its elements.

About the Author

P. P. Ishchenko
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Peter P. Ishchenko, Cand. Sci. (Law), Senior Lecturer, Department of Judicial and Prosecutorial Activity

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya , d. 9, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Averyanova TVBelkin RS,Korukhov YuG,Rossinskaya ER. Kontseptualnye polozheniya kriminalisticheskoy metodiki [Conceptual provisions of criminalistic methodology]. In: Belkin RS, editor. Kriminalistika : uchebnik [Criminalistics : A textbook]. Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.)

2. Bakhin VP, Gora IV. «Kontrkriminalistika» ili novye zadachi kriminalistiki. Aktualni problemi derzhavi ta prava. Odessa: 1998;5. (In Ukrainian)

3. Belkin RS. Kriminalistika: problemy segodnyashnego dnya. zlobodnevnye voprosy rossiyskoy kriminalistiki [Forensics : the problems of today. Current issues of Russian criminalistics]. Moscow: Norma-Infra-M; 2001. (In Russ.)

4. Belkin RS. Kurs kriminalistiki : uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov : v 3 t [Forensics Course : A textbook for universities : in 3 vol.]. 3rd ed., Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.)

5. Vidonov LG, Selivanov NA. Tipovye versii po delam ob ubiystvakh : spravochnoe posobie [Typical versions of homicide cases: A reference manual. Gorky; 1981. (In Russ.)

6. Vozgrin IA, Kriminalisticheskaya kharakteristika prestupleniy [Criminalistic characteristics of crimes]. In: Panteleev IF, Selivanov NA, editors. Kriminalistika : uchebnik [Criminalistics: A textbook]. St. Petersburg; 1995. (In Russ.)

7. Vozgrin IA. Nauchnye osnovy kriminalisticheskoy metodiki rassledovaniya prestupleniy [Scientific bases of criminalistic methods of investigation of crimes]. St. Petersburg: Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; 1992. (In Russ.)

8. Gubanishchev VV. Kriminalisticheskiy analiz mekhanizma prestupnoy deyatelnosti v sfere ekonomiki : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Forensic analysis of the mechanism of criminal activity in the field of economy: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis. Nizhniy Novgorod; 2009. (In Russ.)

9. Isaenko VN. Kriminalisticheskaya kharakteristika prestupleniy i ee raznovidnosti [Criminalistic characteristics of crimes and its varieties]. Krimnalist. 2014;1(14):41—47. (In Russ.)

10. Kirsanov ZI. Kriminalisticheskie ucheniya o mekhanizme prestupleniya i ego otrazhenii [Forensic doctrines on the mechanism of crime and its reflection]. Moscow; 1994. (In Russ.)

11. Kirsanov ZI. Sistema obshchey teorii kriminalistiki [The System of General Theory of Criminalistics]. Moscow; 1992. (In Russ.)

12. Koldin VYa. Versionnyy analiz [An analysis based on presumtions]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.)

13. Koldin VYa, Ishchenko EP, Krestovnikov OA. Tipovaya informatsionnaya model ili kriminalisticheskaya kharakteristika prestupleniya? [Typical information model or criminalistic characterization of a crime?] Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2006;4. (In Russ.)

14. Kolesnichenko AI, Konovalova VE. Kriminalisticheskaya kharakteristika prestupleniy [Forensic characteristics of crimes]. Kharkov; 1985. (In Russ.)

15. Kolesnichenko AN. Nauchnye i pravovye osnovy rassledovaniya otdelnykh vidov prestupleniy : avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Scientific and legal bases of investigation of certain types of crimes : Author’s Abstract]. Kharkov; 1967. (In Russ.)

16. Gerasimov IF, Drapkin LYa, editors. Kriminalistika : uchebnik dlya vuzov [Forensics: textbook for higher education institutions]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola; 1994. (In Russ.)

17. Yablokov NP, editor. Kriminalistika : uchebnik [Forensics: A textbook]. 3rd ed., revised. Moscow: Yurist; 2005. (In Russ.)

18. Belkin RS, Kolomatskiy BG, Luzgin IM, editors. Kriminalistika : uchebnik [Forensics: A textbook]. Moscow: Ak ad. MVD RF; 1995.

19. Vasilyev AN, editor. Kriminalistika : uchebnik [Forensics: A textbook]. Moscow: Moscow State University Publishing House; 1971. (In Russ.)

20. Kustov AM. Kriminalistika i mekhanizm prestupleniya [Criminalistics and the mechanism of crime]. Moscow; 2002. (In Russ.)

21. Kustov AM. Kriminalisticheskoe uchenie o mekhanizme prestupleniya : avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [A forensic doctrine on the mechanism of crime: Author’s Abstract]. Moscow; 1997. (In Russ.)

22. Kustov AM. Mekhanizm prestupleniya : lektsiya [A mechanism of a crime: Lecture]. Stavropol; 1995. (In Russ.)

23. Larin AM. Kriminalistika i parakriminalistika [Criminalistics and paracryminalistics]. Moscow: Bek Publishing; 1996. (In Russ.)

24. Meshkov VM. Metodika rassledovaniya prestupleniy : kurs lektsiy [Methods of investigation of crimes : A course of lectures]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2013. (In Russ.)

25. Obraztsov VA. Uchenie o kriminalisticheskoy kharakteristike prestupleniy [A Doctrine on criminalistic characterization of crimes]. In: Obraztsov VA, editor. Criminalistics. Moscow; 1995. (In Russ.)

26. Ozhegov SI, Shvedova NYu. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. 2nd ed., revised. Moscow: Az’ Publishing; 1994. (In Russ.)

27. Panteleev IF. Kriminalisticheskaya kharakteristika prestupleniy [Criminalistic characteristics of crimes]. In: Panteleev IF, Selivanov NA, editors. Kriminalistika : uchebnik [Criminalistics: A textbook]. Moscow; 1984. (In Russ.)

28. Popper CR. Logika nauchnogo issledovaniya[Logic of scientific research]. Moscow: AST: Astrel Publishing; 2010. (In Russ.)

29. Popper CR. [An assumption and refutation : The growth of scientific knowledge: transl. from English]. Mosccw: AST: AST Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.)

30. Saltevskiy MV. Kriminalisticheskaya kharakteristika: struktura, elementy [Forensic characteristics: The structure, elements]. In: Spetsializirovannyy kurs kriminalistiki [Specialized course of criminalistics]. Kyiv; 1987. (In Russ.)

31. Selivanov NA. Kriminalisticheskie kharakteristiki prestupleniy i sledstvennye situatsii v metodike rassledovaniya [Criminalistic characteristics of crimes and investigative situations in the method of investigation]. Sotsiolisticheskaya zakonnost. 1977;2. (In Russ.)

32. Selivanov NA. Sovetskaya kriminalistika. Sistema ponyatiy [Soviet forensics. A s ystem of concepts]. Moscow; 1982. (In Russ.)

33. Sergeev LA. Rassledovanie i preduprezhdenie khishcheniy, sovershaemykh pri proizvodstve stroitelnykh rabot : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Investigation and prevention of theft committed during construction works: Author’s Abstract]. Moscow; 1966. (In Russ.)

34. Tarskiy A. Istina i dokazatelstvo [Truth and proof]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Phylosophy]. 1972;8:136—145]. (In Russ.)

35. Toporkov AA. Kriminalisticheskaya metodika rassledovaniya prestupleniy [Forensic methods of investigation of crimes]. Moscow: Justicia; 2018. (In Russ.)

36. Turchin DA. Яnachenie mekhanizma prestupleniya v protsesse sledoobrazovaniya [The significance of the mechanism of a crime in the process of making formation]. In: Sovershenstvovanie pravovykh mer borby s prestupnostyu : mezhvuzovskiy tematicheskiy sbornik [Improvement of legal measures to combat crime: interuniversity thematic collection]. Vladivostok; 1986. (In Russ.)

37. Chudinov AN. Slovar inostrannykh slov, voshedshikh v sostav russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of foreign words included in the Russian language]. St. Petersburg; 1910. (In Russ.)

38. Yablokov NP. Kriminalistika : uchebnik [Forensics : A textbook]. Moscow; 1995. (In Russ.)

39. Yablokov NP. [Forensic characterization of crimes as an integral part of the general criminalistic theory]. MSU Vestnik. Series 11: Law. 2000;2. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Ishchenko P.P. Do We Need a Criminalistic Characterization of a Crime in the Criminalistic Methodology? Lex Russica. 2020;73(3):55-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.160.3.055-069

Views: 1005


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)