Forms of Interaction between an Investigator and Bodies of Inquiry at the Initial Stage of Pre-Trial Proceedings

Despite the prolonged use of certain forms of interaction between the investigator and investigative agencies at the initial stage of pre-trial proceedings, the criminal procedure legislation still lacks some aspects of their implementation. This makes it necessary to study the current situation and substantiate the theoretical and practical provisions concerning interaction between an investigator and investigative agencies in the context of verification of the report of the crime in the light of the planned digitalization of domestic criminal proceedings. The author suggests that the forms of interaction, the application of which is expedient at the initial stage of pre-trial proceedings, include two procedural forms (giving written instructions to an investigative agency about carrying out operational search activities, obtaining explanations, obtaining assistance in carrying out investigative and other procedural actions) and two organizational forms (joint planning and formation of an investigative and task force). In order to increase the efficiency of criminal procedure at the initial stage of pre-trial proceedings, to ensure clarity of the language of criminal procedure law and its compliance with law enforcement, the auther proposes to amend Part 1 of Article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by supplementing it with the right of authorized officials and bodies to give to investigative agencies mandatory written instructions for obtaining explanations, and to receive assistance from the investigative agency in carrying out verification actions. At the same time, the paper demonstrates the author’s approch to excluding obtaining explanations from the general list of procedural actions specified in Part 1 of Article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and conducted by authorized subjects of verification of the report of the crime. Also, the paper analyzes the importance of introduction of electronic document circulation into criminal proceedings from the point of view of efficiency of interaction between the investigator and investigative authorities at the initial stage of pre-trial investigation.

criminal proceedings, initial stage of pre-trial proceedings, verification of reports of crime, forms of interaction, digital technologies, bodies of inquiry, investigator

1. Borodin SV. Razreshenie voprosa o vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela [Resolution of the issue of initiation of a criminal case]. Moscow: Publishing house of the All-Russian Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR; 1970. (In Russ.)

2. Borodin SV,Yelesin VI,Shavshin MN. Rassmotrenie i razreshenie organami vnutrennikh del zayavleniy i soobshcheniy o prestupleniyakh [Consideration and resolution of statements and reports of crimes by law inforcement egencies]. Moscow: Publishing house of the All-Russian Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR, 1971. (In Russ.)

3. Varnavskiy DA. proverka soobshcheniya o prestuplenii : genezis i perspektiva : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Verification of a crime report: genesis and perspective: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.)

4. Voskobitova LA. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo i tsifrovye tekhnologii : problemy sovmestimosti [Criminal proceedings and digital technologies: problems of compatibility]. Lex russica. 2019;5:91—104. (In Russ.)

5. Gorban A, Frolova E. Pravovaya obespechennost dokazatelstvennoy sily obyasneniya v ugolovnom protsesse rossii [Legal security of evidentiary force of explanation in the Russian criminal process]. Ugolovnoye pravo. 2015;3:112—118. (In Russ.)

6. Grigoriev AI. Dopustimost obyasneniy v kachestve dokazatelstv po ugolovnomu delu [Admissibility of explanations as evidence in the criminal case]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Juridical Journal]. 2013;5(92):145—148. (In Russ.)

7. Zhamkova OE. Protsedura polucheniya obyasneniy pri proverke soobshcheniy o prestuplenii nuzhdaetsya v regulirovanii [Procedure of obtaining explanations when checking reports on crime needs to be regulated]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel [Russian Investigator]. 2013;2:16—18. (In Russ.)

8. Ilyin IS, Smirnov VA. Voprosy kompleksnogo primeneniya ugolovno-protsessualnykh i operativno-rozysknykh sredstv v protivodeystvii organizovannoy prestupnosti [Questions of complex application of criminalprocedural and operational-search means in counteraction of organized crime]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel [Russian Investigator]. 2014;9:22—25. (In Russ.)

9. Ishchenko PP,Ishchenko EP. Klyuchevye problemy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Key problems of criminal proceedings]. Lex russica. 2016;9:230—241.

10. Kuchkina VG. Sravnitelnyy analiz sledstvennykh i sledstvenno-operativnykh grupp C[omparative analysis of investigative and investigative-operative groups]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel [Russian Investigator]. 2011;24:2—5. (In Russ.)

11. Lazareva VA. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse : uchebnik dlya bakalavrov i magistratury [Proving in criminal proceedings: A textbook for Bachelor Students and Master Students]. 5th ed., revised. Moscow: Yurait Publishin; 2014. (In Russ.)

12. Maslennikova L. Proverochnye deystviya v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [Verification actions an the stage of initiation of criminal proceedings. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost. 1989;6:48—49. (In Russ.)

13. Propastin S. Tipichnye nedostatki organizatsii vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya i operativnykh podrazdeleniy po delam ob ubiystvakh [Typical shortcomings of the organization of interaction of the investigator and operational units on murder cases]. Zakonnost. 2009;3:40—42. (In Russ.)

14. Rossinskiy SB. Sledstvennye deystviya [Investigative actions]. Moscow: Norma Publishing; 2018. (In Russ.)

15. Dikarev IS, editor. Sushchnost i aktualnye problemy stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela : monografiya [The essence and actual problems of the stage of initiation of criminal proceedings: A monograph]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publishing; 2012. (In Russ.)

16. Torbin YuG. Protsessualnaya transformatsiya stati 144 UPK RF [Procedural transformation of article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik rossiyskoy pravovoy akademii [Bulletin of the Russian Law Academy]. 2014;4:73—77; 2015;2:85—89. (In Russ.)

17. Tomin BT, editor. Ugolovnye protsess Rossii : uchebnik [The criminal process of Russia: A textbook]. Moscow: Yurait Publishing; 2003. (In Russ.)

18. Usachev AA. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Initiation of a criminal case in the Russian criminal proceedings: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis. Irkutsk; 2003. (In Russ.)

19. Chinnova MV, Suchkov AV. K voprosu o zakonnosti i obosnovannosti prinyatiya protsessualnykh resheniy i provedeniya proverochnykh meropriyatiy na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela v ugolovnom protsesse rossii [On the Question of Legality and Substantiality of Procedural Decisions and Conducting Verification Activities at the Stage of Initiation of Criminal Case in Russian Criminal Proceedings]. Rossiyskiy sudya [Russian Judge]. 2013;6:14—18. (In Russ.)

20. Schaefer SA. Sledstvennye deystviya : sistema i protsessualnaya forma [Investigative Actions: The system and procedural form]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publishing; 1981. (In Russ.)