Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Sources of Public Relations Legal Regulation in Cyberspace

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.160.3.114-120

Abstract

The paper criticizes the relatively recent view that traditional legal norms cannot be applied to public relations regulation in cyberspace. Researchers are debating whether it is permissible to regulate relationships arising from the use of computer technologies, such as cryptocurrency turnover and other relationships on the blockchain platform, by means of law. Opponents of legal regulation of cryptocurrency turnover refer to the impossibility of regulating computer technology by legal means. It is known that the lack of legal regulation of public relations is no less harmful than their overregulation. The author analyzes classical, "modernist", and eclectic approaches to the legal regulation of public relations in cyberspace. According to the author, public relations in the web space, including those that arise on the blockchain platform, can be regulated not only by national laws, but also by two special new sources of law — computer code (lex informatica) and special customs of cyberspace (lex electronica). Regulation by codes and special customs, which are concentrated on the Internet, gradually form a supranational law of cyberspace. Since the law, algorithmic code, and special customs of cyberspace are different sources of law, the point of view of those researchers who write about the decline of legal regulation and its replacement by code regulation is unfounded. It is premature to conclude that the law is dying out in the transition of contractual relations to cyberspace. Lawrence Lessig’s expression "Code is law" is correct in the sense that code is only one possible source of law.

About the Author

L. G. Efimova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Lyudmila G. Efimova, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of Banking Law

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Vasilevskaya LYu. Token kak novyy obekt grazhdanskikh prav: problemy yuridicheskoy kvalifikatsii tsifrovogo prava [Token as a new civil rights object: issues of legal classification of digital law]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2019;5:111—19.

2. Inyushkin AA. Sravnenie pravovogo regulirovaniya baz dannykh, raspredelennykh reestrov i tekhnologii blokcheyn v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve [Comparison of legal regulation of databases, distributed registries and blockchain technology in Russian legislation]. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravneniepravovogo-regulirovaniya-baz-dannyh-raspredelennyh-reestrov-i-tehnologii-blokcheyn-v-rossiyskomzakonodatelstve/viewer [cited 2018 October 10].

3. Krysenkova NB. Smart-kontrakty v inostrannom pravovom prostranstve [Smart contracts in a foreign legal space]. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2019;5.

4. Sidorenko E, Savelev A, Pushkov A, Yankovskiy R, Chuburkov A, Dedova E, Gulyaeva N, Arkhipov V, Tyulkanov A, Bulgakov I, Kostyra A. Nuzhno li regulirovat bitkoin? [Is it necessary to regulate bitcoin?]. Zakon. 2017;9.

5. De Filippi P, Hassan S. Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: from ‘ code is law to law is code. First Monday. December 2016;21(12-5). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7113/5657#p1 [cited 2018 October 10].

6. Godefroy L. Le code algorithmique au service du droit. Recueil Dalloz. 2018 Avril 12; 14/7771.

7. Guerlin G. Considérations sur les smart contracts. Dalloz IP/IT. Droit de la propriété intellectuelle et du numérique. October 2017;10.

8. Kablan SA. Pour une évolution du droit des contrats: le contrat électronique et les agents intelligents. Thèse présentée à la Faculté des études supérieures de l’université Laval dansl ecadre du programme de doctorat en droit pour l’obtention du grade de docteur en droit (LL.D.) Faculté de droit. Université Laval Québec. 2008. Available from: https://corpus.ulaval.ca/jspui/handle/20.500.11794/19829?locale=en [cited 2020 January 13].

9. Katsh M. Е. Law in a Digital World. New York: Oxford: Oxford University press; 1995. Available from: http://bookfi.net/book/624640 [cited 2020 January 13].

10. Savelyev A. Legal Aspects of Ownership in Modified Open Source Software and its Impact on Russian Import Substitution Policy Software. Computer Law & Security Review; 2016.


Review

For citations:


Efimova L.G. Sources of Public Relations Legal Regulation in Cyberspace. Lex Russica. 2020;73(3):114-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.160.3.114-120

Views: 2583


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)