Law-Making Process in the Russian Empire: Urban Planning Policy and Legislation
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.162.5.106-115
Abstract
The paper presents the evolution of law-making process in the Russian Empire through the prism of urban planning legal regulation. It covers the period of uncodified and codified legislation with the period up to the appearance of the Digest of Laws of the Russian Empire (all its editions) and the Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire (PSZRI). In these materials, the author identified about 300 historical normative acts related to the regulation of urban development from the era of Peter the Great to 1825 (the period systematized in the PSZRI), and a number of major codified acts of the 19th — early 20th century. The analysis of their content and form formed the basis for conclusions about the quality of law-making process in the Russian Empire.
Based on the analysis of normative material covering construction, architectural legislation, legal norms in the field of organization of urban development, the author considers the characteristic features of pre-revolutionary law-making process in encouraging the creation of normative acts, conceptual techniques of legal technology, systematization characteristics. Subjects of law-making process are singled out. Normative acts are classified according to different grounds, a parallel is drawn with the modern hierarchy of normative acts, and historical features of their typology are highlighted. The author draws conclusions about the inaccurate classification of the main identified acts (charters) as codes, about the prevalence of legal idealism in the concept and policy of urban planning regulation. The source of fixing public relations in the form of a legal norm is the monarch’s will. In the research area it is based on the idea of an ideal city, the concept of which has evolved from the idea of regularity to a rational capitalist space. It was supplemented by proposals from the professional community at the end of the period.
About the Author
I. G. PirozhkovaRussian Federation
Irina G. Pirozhkova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Cand. Sci. (Law), Cand. Sci. (History), Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law
ul. Michurinskaya, d. 112d, Tambov, 392032
References
1. Aronova AA. Volya petra i sila obstoyatelstv: pervye desyat let arkhitekturnoy istorii Peterburga [Peter’s will and the power of circumstances: the first ten years of architectural history of St. Petersburg]. In: Arkhitektura v istorii russkoy kultury. Issue 4: Vlast i tvorchestvo. Moscow; 1999. P. 92-99. (In Russ.)
2. Bezgin VB. Pravovye obychai i pravosudie russkikh krestyan vtoroy poloviny XIX — nachala XX veka [Legal customs and justice of Russian peasants of the second half of the 19th — beginning of the 20th century]. Tambov; 2012. (In Russ)
3. Gryaznova NV. Sozdanie seti gorodskikh poseleniy v kontse XVIII v. kak popytka resheniya politicheskikh problem [Creation of a network of urban settlements at the end of the 18th century as an attempt to solve political problems]. Gorodskoe upravlenie. 1999;3(32):11-2. (In Russ.)
4. Demichev AA. Printsipy i perspektivy nauchnogo napravleniya «Khronodiskretnoe monogeograficheskoe sravnitelnoe pravovedenie» [Principles and perspectives of the scientific field "Chrono-discretionary monogeografic comparative law"]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy Akademii MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation]. 2016;1(33):23-8. (In Russ.)
5. Dolzhnost arkhitekturnoy ekspeditsii: Traktat-kodeks 1737-1740 gg. Vstupitelnaya statya D. Arkina [Position of the architectural expedition: 1737-1740 Tractate-Codex. Introductory article by D. Arkin]. Arkhitekturnyy arkhiv [Architectural archive]. 1946;1:7-100. (In Russ.)
6. Elchaninov AP, Elchaninova OYu. Kontseptualnye podkhody k evolyutsii zakonodatelstva v sfere primeneniya smertnoy kazni v epokhu Elizavety Petrovny [Conceptual approaches to the evolution of legislation in the field of the death penalty in the era of Elizabeth]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava [History of State and Law]. 2014;3:54-9. (In Russ.)
7. Elchaninova OYu., Elchaninov AP. Preemstvennost i novatsii zakonotvorcheskoy deyatelnosti Anny Ioannovny [Continuity and innovations of Anna Ioannovna’s legislative activity]. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya [Legal research]. 2015;8:112-16. (In Russ.)
8. Matuzov NI, Malko AV, editors. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: kurs lektsiy [Theory of state and law: a course of lectures]. Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.)
9. Teslya AA. Istochniki (formalnye) grazhdanskogo prava Rossiyskoy imperii v XIX-nachale XX veka [Sources (formal) of civil law of the Russian Empire in the 19th-early 20th century]. Available from: http://www.ex-jure.ru/law/news.php?newsid=332 [cited 2019 Oct 01]. (In Russ.)
10. Tomsinov VA. «Vsem dólzhno khranit interes gosudarev i gosudarstvennoy»: Petr I kak zakonodatel ["Everyone should keep the interest of the sovereign and the state": Peter I as a legislator]. Available from: http://tomsinov.com/Articles/Misc/petr_i.pdf [cited 2019 Oct 01]. (In Russ.)
11. Shipilov AN. P.E. Kazanskiy o problemakh pravotvorchestva v Rossiyskoy Imperii nachala XX veka [P.E Kazanskiy on the problems of law-making process in the Russian Empire of the beginning of the 20th century]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014;12 (3):190-3. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Pirozhkova I.G. Law-Making Process in the Russian Empire: Urban Planning Policy and Legislation. Lex Russica. 2020;73(5):106-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.162.5.106-115