Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in the Field of Virtual and Augmented Reality

In the paper, the author notes that the development of modern technologies, including artificial intelligence, unmanned transport, robotics, portable and embedded digital devices, already has a great impact on the daily life of a person and can fundamentally change the existing social order in the near future.

Virtual reality as a technology was born in the cross-section of research in the field of three-dimensional computer graphics and human-machine interaction. The spectrum of mixed reality includes the real world itself, the one that is before our eyes, the world of augmented reality — an improved reality that results from the introduction of sensory data into the field of perception in order to supplement information about the surrounding world and improve the perception of information; the world of virtual reality, which is created using technologies that provide full immersion in the environment. In some studies, augmented virtuality is also included in the spectrum, which implies the addition of virtual reality with elements of the real world (combining the virtual and real world).

The paper substantiates the conclusion that in the near future both the legislator and judicial practice will have to find a balance between the interests of the creators of virtual worlds and virtual artists exclusive control over their virtual works, on the one hand, and society in using these virtual works and their development, on the other hand. It is necessary to allow users to participate, interact and create new forms of creative expression in the virtual environment.

The author concludes that a broader interpretation of the fair use doctrine should be applied in this area, especially for those virtual worlds and virtual objects that imitate the real world and reality. However, it is necessary to distinguish between cases where the protection of such objects justifies licensing and those where it is advisable to encourage unrestricted use of the results for the further development of new technologies. 

1. Braslavskiy PI. Tekhnologiya virtualnoy realnosti kak fenomen kultury kontsa XX — nachala XXI v.: avtoref. dis. ... kand. kulturol. nauk [Virtual reality technology as a cultural phenomenon of the end of the 20th — beginning of the 21st century. Cand. Sci. (Cultural Studies) Thesis]. Ekaterinburg; 2003. (In Russ.)

2. Gavrilov EP. V patentnom prave — novizna, v avtorskom — originalnost [In patent law — novelty, in copyright — originality]. Patenty i litsenzii [Patents and licenses]. 2007;12. (In Russ.)

3. Grin ES, Koroleva AG. Formirovanie bazovykh modeley okhrany tekhnologiy virtualnoy i dopolnennoy realnosti v sfere prava intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Formation of basic models of protection of technologies of virtual and augmented reality in the context of intellectual property rights]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2019;6:90-97. (In Russ.)

4. King B. Epokha dopolnennoy realnosti [The age of augmented reality]. Transl. from Eng. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.)

5. Pirogova VV. Sovremennaya kontseptsiya okhrany izobreteniya (soglashenie o torgovykh aspektakh prav intellektualnoy sobstvennosti — TRIPS) [Modern concept of invention protection (Agreement on RradeRelated Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights — TRIPS)]. Legal reference system "Konsultant Plus:" [Electronic resource]. «KonsultantPlus»; 2012. (In Russ.)

6. Slyshchenkov VA, Levin AE. Okhrana programm dlya EVM: v poiskakh effektivnykh pravovykh resheniy [Protection of computer programs: in search of effective legal solutions]. Yurist [Lawyer]. 2008;8. (In Russ.)

7. Churilov A. Rezhimy okhrany programm dlya EVM: izobretenie, kommercheskaya tayna ili literaturnoe proizvedenie? [Modes of protection of computer programs: an invention, a trade secret or literary work?]. IS. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava [IP. Copyright and related rights]. 2017;7:35-44. (In Russ.)

8. Shebanova NA. Tekhnologii pogruzheniya: voprosy svoevremennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya [Technologies of immersion: questions of timeliness of legal regulation]. Zhurnal suda po intellektualnym pravam. 2019;26:6- 19. (In Russ.)

9. Lemley MA, Volokh E. Law, Virtual Reality, and Augmented Reality. University of Pennsylvania Law Abstract. 2018;166:1051. Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2933867. UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 17-13. [cited 2020 May 20]:210-211. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2933867 (In Eng.)

10. Newman JO. New Lyrics for Old Melody: The Idea/Expression Dichotomy in the Computer Age. Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 1999;17:691. (Judge Newman authored Altai). (In Eng.)

11. Russo J, Risch M. Virtual Copyright (October 12, 2017). In: Barfield W, Blitz M, editors. The Law of Virtual and Augmented Reality. 2018 Forthcoming. [cited 2020 May 20]. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3051871 (In Eng.)