Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Syncretism of the City: Legal Aspects of Various Scientific Theories of the City

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.165.8.009-020

Abstract

Nearly a dozen and a half different humanities, natural and technical sciences have chosen the city as a subject of research and, within their subject areas, have developed theoretical approaches to defining the livesustaining activities of the city. All spheres of the city’s existence are interconnected, at least to some extent, by a complex system of city legal relationships and are combined into a single complex, dynamic, controversial, but rather stable structure. In other words, we can, by means of law, investigate the whole (syncretism) of various scientific approaches to the analysis and description of the system of life of the city and its inhabitants. The author investigates various approaches to the concept of syncretism, including the essence of syncretism in legal context. The concept of syncretism is applied to the city in order to present it as a legal framework linking the knowledge of the city of various humanities into the system of social relations in order to explore the main spheres of the population’s life. The paper investigates some basic provisions of the theories of the city of such humanities as history, sociology, philosophy, psychology, economics, urban studies and political science as a matter of law. The purpose of the study is to form a new, comprehensive legal approach to the understanding of the essence of urban life and urbanization processes within the framework of legal urbanology with due regard to the totality of theoretical and practical knowledge about cities accumulated in some humanities. This study implements an interdisciplinary approach based on the use of sources from different fields of scientific knowledge on the basis of general scientific and private scientific research methods (analysis, synthesis, deduction, hypothetical, statistical, comparative-legal, and prognostic methods). Analysis of legal aspects of the main approaches of some humanities to the study of the city shows their syncretic character and the possibility of forming a generalized legal theory of the city within the framework of legal urbanology as a branch in legal science on the basis of fundamental and applied interdisciplinary studies of the city.

About the Author

V. V. Tabolin
State University of Management
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Tabolin, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Public Law and Legal Support

pr-t Ryazanskiy, d. 99, Moscow, 109542



References

1. Antsiferov NP. Puti izucheniya goroda kak sotsialnogo organizma. Opyt kompleksnogo podkhoda. Ways to explore the city as a social organism [Ways to explore the city as a social organism. Experience of the Integrated Approach]. Leningrad: "Seyatel" E. V. Vysotskiy Publishing house; 1926. (In Russ.)

2. Arkhangelskaya AS. Budushchee za sinkretizmom? (K voprosu o stile myshleniya) [Does the future belong to syncretism? (The Issue of the style of thinking)]. Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Political Science, Sociology. 2011;24(63)(2):3-11. (In Russ.)

3. Bitkina S. Komu nuzhen Dobrograd [Who needs Dobrograd]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. [12 January 2017]. 281(7447). (In Russ.)

4. Byukher K, Mayr G, Zimmel G, Ventig G, Peterman T, Shefer D. Bolshie goroda, ikh obshchestvennoe, politicheskoe i ekonomicheskoe znachenie [Big cities, their social, political and economic significance]. St. Petersburg: Prosveshchenie; 1905. (In Russ.)

5. Veber M. Istoriya khozyaystva. Gorod [History of the Economy. A City]. Moscow: Kanon-Press-Ts, Kuchkovo Pole Publ.; 2001. (In Russ.)

6. Vershinina IA. Sovremennye teorii goroda: sotsiologicheskiy analiz [Modern theories of the city: sociological analysis]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.)

7. Gavrilova YuV. Sinkretizm kak faktor formirovaniya i evolyutsii sotsialnoy realnosti [Syncretism as a factor of formation and evolution of social reality]. Humanitarian Vector. 2015;2(42):29—34. (In Russ.)

8. Galiev FKh. Vozdeystvie prava na obshchestvennye otnosheniya i sinkretizm pravovoy kultury [Impact of the right on social relations and syncretism of legal culture]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Bashkir University]. 2013;4:1353—1356. (In Russ.)

9. Gornova GV. Filosofiya goroda : monografiya [Philosophy of the City: A Monograph]. Moscow: Forum: Infra-M; 2015. (In Russ.)

10. Dementiev AN, Dementiev FA. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy opredeleniya arkhitekturnogradostroitelnykh terminov v zakonodatelstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Сhast 1 [Theoretical and practical problems of definition of architectural and urban planning terms in the legislation of the Russian Federation]. Part 1. Town-Planning Law. 2019;3:6—10. (In Russ.)

11. Dzhivelegov A. K. Srednevekovye goroda v Zapadnoy Evrope [Medieval cities in Western Europe]. St. Petersburg: Brockhauz & Efron Publ.; 1902. (In Russ.)

12. Drobysheva TV, Zhuravlev AL. Gorod kak obekt issledovaniya v sotsialnoy psikhologii: k istorii voprosa [The city as an object of research in social psychology: The history of the question]. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2016;1:196—213. (In Russ.)

13. Esakov VA. Megapolis v zerkale sotsialnoy filosofii [Megapolis in the mirror of social philosophy]. Moscow: Infra-M; 2016. (In Russ.)

14. Ospennikov YuV, editor. Istochniki russkogo gorodskogo prava XIII—XVIII vv. [Sources of Russian City Law of the 13th—18th centuries]. Samara: Scientific and Technical Center; 2016. (In Russ.)

15. Kasatkina SS. Urbosfera: sistemno-semioticheskiy analiz : dis. ... d-ra filos. nauk [Urbosphere: system-semiotic analysis: Dr. Philos. Sciences Dissertation]. Ivanovo; 2018. (In Russ.)

16. Kiduell P. Psikhologiya goroda. Kak byt schastlivym v megapolise. [Psychology of the City. How to be happy in the metropolis]. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber Publ., 2018. (In Russ.)

17. Kistyakovskiy BA. sotsialnye nauki i pravo. ocherki po metodologii sotsialnykh nauk i obshchey teorii prava [Social sciences and law. Essays on the methodology of social sciences and general theory of law]. Moscow: Izd. M. & S. Sabashnikovykh; 1916. (In Russ.)

18. Kornev AV. Sotsiologiya i pravo : uchebnik [Sociology and Law: A Textbook]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2015. (In Russ.)

19. Lazarev VV. Poisk nauki o prave i gosudarstve (nauchno-publitsisticheskoe esse) [Search for science of law and the State (a scientific and publicistic essay)]. Lex russica. 2013;4:345—352. (In Russ.)

20. Martynenko TS. Globalnaya sotsiologiya G. Terborna: teoriya sotsialnykh neravenstv [Global Sociology of G. Terborn: Theory of Social Inequalities]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. 2015;1(29):185—193. (In Russ.).

21. Martyanov VS. Seti gorodov kak alternativa gosudarstvam: uyazvimaya teoriya ili realnoe budushchee? [Networks of cities as an alternative to states: a vulnerable theory or a real future?]. PolitBook. 2016;2:73—86. (In Russ.)

22. Martyanov VS. Transformatsiya faktorov razvitiya severnykh gorodov Rossii: vnutrennie migratsii i diversifikatsiya resursov [Transformation of factors of development of northern cities of Russia: internal migrations and diversification of resources]. Diskurs-Pi Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.)

23. Menshikova E. Nauki, obsluzhivayushchie slozhneyshuyu model obshchestva — gorod [Sciences serving the most complex model of the society — the city]. Izvestiya vuzov. 2016;8:85—91. (In Russ.)

24. Petrovskaya OV. Sovremennye teorii razvitiya urbanizma [Modern theories of urbanism development]. Nauchnaya mysl Kavkaza [Scientific Thought of the Caucasus]. 2014;4:31—36. (In Russ.)

25. Sorina GV. Novyy sinkretizm v sisteme podgotovki spetsialistov vysshey kvalifikatsii [New syncretism in the system of training specialists of higher qualification]. Russian Journal of Phylosophical Sciences. 2009;9:1-12. (In Russ.)

26. Tikhomirov YuA. Povedenie v obshchestve i pravo [Conduct in Society and Law]. Journal of Russian Law. 2019;5:5—20. (In Russ.)

27. Trubina EG. City in Theory: Reflection of Space. Moscow: New Literary Review; 2011. (In Russ.)

28. Von Belov G. Gorodskoy stroy i gorodskaya zhizn srednevekovoy Germanii [Urban Structure and Urban Life of Medieval Germany]. Trans. E. Petrushevskaya. Moscow: M. and S. Sabashnikovykh Publishing House; 1912. (In Russ.)

29. Froyanov IYa, Dvornichenko AYu. Пoroda-gosudarstva Drevney Rusi [City-state of Ancient Russia]. Leningrad University Leningrad: Publishing House; 1988. (In Russ.)

30. Khabrieva TYa, Chirkin VE. Sotsialnaya spravedlivost (nekotorye konstitutsionnye voprosy) [Social Justice (Constitutional Issues). Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2017;3:5-14. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Tabolin V.V. Syncretism of the City: Legal Aspects of Various Scientific Theories of the City. Lex Russica. 2020;73(8):9-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.165.8.009-020

Views: 527


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)