The Law of the Network Society and the Problem of Hybridity Management

The network society, which is relevant to the social landscape of the 21st century, determines the building of a new architecture of law. The current legal map of the world is extremely heterogeneous and often does not coincide with the political map of the world. It is full of a variety of normative arrays that collide with each other, layered on top of each other, while the traditional legal methodology is not always able to resolve conflicts that arise. The problem of controversy between law and not law is gaining considerable potential due to the rapid growth of non-legal matter and the emergence of legitimizing institutions. The situation is complicated by the simultaneous existence of several institutional dispute resolution systems (state, non-state, alternative, platform-based) that refer to completely different, relatively autonomous subsystems of norms as applicable law. Such material and institutional fragmentation, the emergence of hybrid regulatory and institutional regimes has provoked an active search for new principles of building a legal architecture that is adequate to such a rapidly changing society. Globalization is transforming into networking, which redefines the geography of the world, the well-known and traditional principles of affiliation of legal entities, and then exacerbates the debates about legal taxonomy. The marked evolution of the legal superstructure also generates new types of conflicts, prompting the search for a new or adaptation of the known methodology in order to overcome them.

The paper attempts to explore the new normativity in the context of a new sociality, to identify key trends in the development of the law of a network society, to predict the development of individual legal and sub-legal institutions, and to model legal ways of managing hybridity.

1. Voynikanis EA. Paradigmalnyy sdvig v sovremennom prave [Paradigm shift in modern law]. In: Filosofiya politiki i prava: sbornik nauchnykh rabot [Philosophy of politics and law: collection of papers]. Moscow: A. V. Vorobyov Publishing House; 2010;1:138-161. (In Russ.)

2. Zorkin VD. Pravo v usloviyakh globalnykh peremen [Law in the conditions of global changes]. Moscow: Norma; 2013. (In Russ.)

3. Khabrieva TYa. Tsiklicheskie normativnye massivy v prave [Cyclical normative arrays in law]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2019;12:5-18. (In Russ.)

4. Khabrieva TYa, Chernogor NN. Pravo v usloviyakh tsifrovoy realnosti [Law in the conditions of digital reality]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2018;1:85-102. (In Russ.)

5. Berman PS. Global Legal Pluralism. Southern California Law Abstract. 2007;80:1155-2007. (In Eng.)

6. Berman PS. Towards a Cosmopolitan Vision of Conflict of Laws: Redefining Governmental Interests in a Global Era. University of Pennsylvania Law Abstract. 2005;153:1819-1882. (In Eng.)

7. Castells M. The Information Age. Economy, Society, and Culture. The Rise of the Network Society. Second edition with a new preface. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. (In Eng.)

8. Cotterrell R. What Is Transnational Law? Law & Social Inquiry. 2012;37(2):500-524. (In Eng.)

9. De Carolis D. The process of harmonisation of the law of international commercial arbitration: drafting and diffusion of uniform norms. Doctoral Thesis. Available from: http://eprints-phd.biblio.unitn.it/214/1/dissertation.pdf. (In Eng.)

10. Fischer-Lescano A, Teubner G. Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law. 2004;25:999-1046. (In Eng.)

11. Katyal SK, Grinvald LC. Platform Law and the Brand Enterprise. Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 2017;32:1135-1182. (In Eng.)

12. Lobel O. The Law of the Platform. Minnesota Law Abstract. 2016;101:87-166. (In Eng.)

13. Michaels R. The Re-State-Ment of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law, and the Challenge from Global Legal Pluralism. Wayne Law Abstract. 2005;51:1209-1259. (In Eng.)

14. Teubner G. Breaking Frames: Globalization and the Emergence of Lex mercatoria. European Journal of Social Theory. 2002;5(2):205-211. (In Eng.)

15. Teubner G. Two Kinds of Legal Pluralism: Collision of Transnational Regimes in the Double Fragmentation of World Society. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228241875_Two_Kinds_of_Legal_Pluralism_Collision_of_Transnational_Regimes_in_the_Double_Fragmentation_of_World_Society. (In Eng.)