The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and Protection of Rights and Freedoms

The main objective of the Constitutional Court is to protect rights and freedoms within its jurisdiction. The implementation of this objective is illustrated by the analysis how frequently the Court cited constitutional provisions concerning rights and freedoms in its decisions during the period of its work until 1 June 2020. The paper contains analysis of the data mentioned above. In a problematic way, the author demonstartes his approach to the understanding of the purpose of rights and freedoms in their relation to the duties of people. Theoretically, the intended purpose of rights and freedoms is to ensure the social freedom of people who are anxious for a fair social order, their full self-determination and the self-development of society. This implies that the Constitutional Court focuses not merely on the current protection of certain rights and freedoms, but on ensuring their priority in general in social and legal regulation, creating and maintaining a spirit of priority and overcoming the paternalistic order in the country. The priority of rights and freedoms extends not only to rights and freedoms expressly enshrined, but also to other people’s claims (legitimate interests, legitimate expectations). The latter are intended to guide implementation of other rights and freedoms, and, at the same time, to serve as the basis for the allocation of new rights. One of the manifestations of the priority of constitutional rights and freedoms is the direct application of rules that enshrine rights and freedoms by the Constitutional Court to the sectoral regulation, expanding the scope of rights and freedoms, particularly through the interpretation of constitutional concepts on the case-by-case basis. Particular attention is paid to the doctrinal views and approach of the Constitutional Court to the role of the category of human dignity in the systematic application of rights and freedoms. The paper has analysed how the Constitutional Court applies a well-known construction of a strong and weak entity in legal relations in its application to public power relations. Another aspect of the subject matter is the Court’s approach to securing the balance between different rights and freedoms.

Constitution, Constitutional Court, law, rights and freedoms, legitimate interests, legitimate expectations, duties, priority of rights and freedoms, human dignity, rights — “locomotives”, balance between rights and freedoms, competition of the same rights, competition of different rights of one entity

1. Bondar NS, Dzhagaryan AA. Pryamoe deystvie Konstitutsii: generatsiya i garantirovanie konstitutsionnym pravosudiem [Direct Action of the Constitution: Generation and Guarantee of Constitutional Justice]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review]. 2016;3:52—78. (In Russ.)

2. Gurvich GD. Filosofiya i sotsiologiya prava : izbrannye proizvedeniya [Philosophy and Sociology of Law: Selected Works]. St. Petersburg; 2004. (In Russ.)

3. Ilina EA. Mmetafizika chelovecheskogo dostoinstva: mezhdistsiplinarnyy vzglyad na universalnuyu pravovuyu kategoriyu [Metaphysics of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary View of Universal Legal Category]. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2020;4:9—16. (In Russ.)

4. Kokotov AN. Konstitutsionnyy sud Rossii i makropravovoe regulirovanie [Constitutional Court of Russia and Macrolegal Regulation]. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2020;3:3—7. (In Russ.)

5. Komarova VV. Pravo na zhizn v doktrine i v prave [The Right to Life in Doctrine and Law]. Law and State: The Theory and Practice. 2013;5:46—49. (In Russ.)

6. Kondrashev AA. Ogranicheniya konstitutsionnykh prav v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: teoreticheskie podkhody i politiko-pravovaya praktika [Restrictions of Constitutional Rights in the Russian Federation: Theoretical Approaches and Political and Legal Practice]. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2014;7:40—47 (In Russ.)

7. Lazarev VV. Ogranichenie prava sudebnymi resheniyami [Limitation of the right by judicial decisions]. Journal of Russian Law. 2018;6:5—16. (In Russ.)

8. Lebedev VA. Konstitutsionnye osnovy ogranicheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina Constitutional [Foundations of Restriction of Human and Citizen’s Rights and Freedoms]. Lex russica. 2017;1:130—138. (In Russ.)

9. Liverovskiy AA. Ratsionalnaya model konstitutsionnogo regulirovaniya [Rational Model of Constitutional Regulation]. Lex russica. 2019;1:70—82. (In Russ.)

10. Nazarov DG. predely i ogranicheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossii [Limits and Restrictions of Human and Citizen Rights and Freedoms in Russia]. Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2016;1:87—92. (In Russ.)

11. Narutto SV. Konkurentsiya konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod cheloveka v interpretatsiyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Competition of constitutional rights and freedoms in the interpretations of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2010;2:56—64. (In Russ.)

12. Nevinskiy VV. Dostoinstvo cheloveka v Rossii: mezhdu pravovym romantizmom i pravovym pragmatizmom [Dignity of Man in Russia: Between Legal Romanticism and Legal Pragmatism]. Russian Law Journal. 2002;3:98—103. (In Russ.)

13. Nevinskiy VV. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii i dostoinstvo cheloveka (vospominanie o budushchem) [The Constitution of the Russian Federation and Human Dignity (Memories of the Future)]. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2013;11:48—54. (In Russ.)

14. Nevinskiy VV. Pravo cheloveka na dostoynuyu zhizn v sisteme konstitutsionnykh tsennostey Rossii (nevzyatyy rubezh postsovetskoy istorii) [The Human Right to a Decent Life in the System of Constitutional Values of Russia (Untaken Frontier of Post-Soviet History)]. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2018;12:56—65. (In Russ.)

15. Novgorodtsev PI. Ob obshchestvennom ideale [On the public ideal]. Moscow; 1991. (In Russ.)

16. Semitko AP. Razvitie pravovoy kultury kak pravovoy progress: problemy teorii i metodologii : avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Development of Legal Culture as Legal Progress: Problems of Theory and Methodology: Author’s Abstract, Dr. Sci. (Law)]. Ekaterinburg; 1996. (In Russ.)

17. Solovyov E. Lichnost i pravo [Personality and Law]. Available from: https://scepsis.net/library/id_2663.html (accessed: 31 August 2019). (In Russ.)