Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Legally Binding Relationships with Regard to Digital Objects of Civil Rights

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.167.10.021-031

Abstract

The paper, based on the analysis of the legal nature of new digital objects of civil rights (digital rights, digital currency), makes conclusions concerning possible models of contractual relations arising from object’s data.

The author relies on the fact that in relation to the category “a digital right” an independent object can be recognized only in connection with the peculiarities of the form of the object (the form in which the property rights are fixed) rather than its content. Token is seen as a technical concept. i.e. a digital way of fixing property rights. The paper substantiates that the retributive disposal of the digital right (both as a utilitarian digital right and a digital financial asset), according to which the digital right acquirer in order to transfer the right in question undertakes to pay a certain amount of money, under the general rule, should be qualified as a contract for the sale of a digital right. At the same time, in each case this also refers to the transfers the subject matter of which covers the transfer of a separate property right as an object of civil rights (cashless money, a book-entry security, a law of obligation (claims)) classified by law as a digital right.

From the author’s point of view, digital currency in the system of objects of civil rights can be qualified only as “other property” in compliance with the the sui generis principle. It is concluded that transactions with digital currency should be classified as non-defined contracts. Contractual legal relations aimed at exchanging various objects for digital currency, in cases not contrary to the law, by analogy of the law, can be regulated under the rules applied to the contract of sale, the exclusive right alienation agreement or license agreement. Based on the special provisions of the law, a legally binding relationship regulating the digital currency, provided the tax authorities are not informed about such possession and transactions with such an object, has features of a natural obligation.

About the Author

O. S. Grin
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Oleg S. Grin, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Agibalova EN. Tsifrovye prava v sisteme obektov grazhdanskikh prav [Digital Rights in the System of Objects of Civil Rights]. Law Herald of the Dagestan State University. 2020;33(1):90-99. (In Russ.)

2. Andreev VK. O ponyatii tsifrovykh prav i ikh oborotosposobnosti [On the concept of digital rights and their turnover capacity]. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Corporate Law. 2018;2. (In Russ.)

3. Vasilevskaya LYu. Token kak novyy obekt grazhdanskikh prav: problemy yuridicheskoy kvalifikatsii tsifrovogo prava [Token as a New Object of Civil Rights: Problems of Legal Qualification of a Digital Right]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2019;5:111—119. (In Russ.)

4. Gongalo BM, Novoselova LA. Est li mesto «tsifrovym pravam» v sisteme obektov grazhdanskogo prava [Whether there is a place for “digital rights” in the system of objects of civil law]. Perm Legal Almanac. 2019;2:179—192. (In Russ.)

5. Egorova MA, Kozhevina OV. Mesto kriptovalyuty v sisteme obektov grazhdanskikh prav [The Place of cryptocurrency in the system of objects of civil rights]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2020;15(1):81—91. (In Russ.)

6. Efimova LG. Token kak virtualnyy obekt grazhdanskogo prava [Token as a virtual object of civil law]. Banking Law. 2020;3. (In Russ.)

7. Efimova OV., Baldina SS. Tsifrovye prava kak novyy obekt grazhdanskikh prav [Digital Rights as a New Object of Civil Rights]. Scientific Works of the Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notary. 2019;3:45—47. (In Russ.)

8. Kartskhiya AA. Tsifrovye prava i pravoprimenenie [Digital rights and law enforcement]. Monitoring pravoprimeneniya [Monitoring of Law Enforcement]. 2019;2:43—46. (In Russ.)

9. Krasikova AV. Kriptovalyuta: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya [Cryptocurrency: Problems of Legal Regulation]. Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin. 2019;6:111—114. (In Russ.)

10. Kulikova AA. Tsifrovye prava v rossiyskoy pravovoy sisteme: ponyatie, vidy [Digital rights in the Russian legal system: concept, types]. The Modern Lawyer. 2019;1:178—185. (In Russ.)

11. Lolaeva AS. Tsifrovye prava v strukture obektov grazhdanskikh prav [Digital Rights in the Structure of Civil Rights Objects]. Agrarian and Land Law. 2019;6:47—49. (In Russ.)

12. Luntz LA. Dengi i denezhnye obyazatelstva v grazhdanskom prave [Money and monetary obligations in civil law]. Moscow: Statute; 2004. (In Russ.)

13. Mozolin VP. Sovremennaya doktrina i grazhdanskoe zakonodatelstvo [Modern Doctrine and Civil Legislation]. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.)

14. Molchanov AA. Zakonodatelnoe priznanie tsifrovykh prav kak odnogo iz obektov grazhdanskogo prava [Legislative Recognition of Digital Rights as One of Objects of Civil Law]. Vestnik of Putilin Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Interior of Russia. 2020;3:4—8. (In Russ.)

15. Novoselova L, Gabov A, Savelyev A, Genkin A, Sarbash S, Asoskov A, Semenov A, Yankovskiy R, Zhuravlev A, Tolkachev A, Kamelkova A, Uspensky M, Krupenin R, Kyslyy V, Zhuzhzhalov M, Popov V, Agranovskaya M. Tsifrovye prava v sisteme obektov grazhdanskikh prav [Digital rights in the system of objects of civil rights]. Zakon. 2019;5:31—54. (In Russ.)

16. Sukhanov EA, editor. Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo : uchebnik : v 2 t. [Russian civil law: textbook: in 2 vol.]. Vol. 1. Moscow; 2010. (In Russ.)

17. Saveliev AI. Nekotorye riski tokenizatsii i blokcheynizatsii grazhdansko-pravovykh otnosheniy [Some risks of tokenization and blockchainization of civil relations]. Zakon. 2018;2:36—51. (In Russ.)

18. Shaydullina VK. Kriptovalyuta kak novoe ekonomiko-pravovoe yavlenie [Cryptocurrency as a new economic and legal phenomenon]. Vestnik universiteta. 2018;2:137—142. (In Russ.)

19. Eskindarov MA, Abramova MA, Maslennikov VV, Amosova NA, Varnavskiy AV, Dubova SE, Zvonova EA, Krivoruchko SV, Lopatin VA, Pishchyk VYa, Rudakova OS, Ruchkina GF, Slavin BB, Fedotova MA. Napravleniya razvitiya fintekha v Rossii: ekspertnoe mnenie finansovogo universiteta [Directions of Fintech Development in Russia: Expert Opinion of the Financial University]. The World of New Economy. 2018;12:6—23. (In Russ.)

20. Black’s Law Dictionary. 10th edition. West; 2014.

21. Wright A, De Filippi P. Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580664 (accessed: 10 September 2020).


Review

For citations:


Grin O.S. Legally Binding Relationships with Regard to Digital Objects of Civil Rights. Lex Russica. 2020;73(10):21-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.167.10.021-031

Views: 1076


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)