Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Interest and Need: Critical Look at their Identification in Russian Law

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.167.10.091-105

Abstract

Based on a critical analysis of the doctrinal definitions of the concept of "interest" in sociology, psychology, and law, it is concluded that the prevailing point of view in modern Russian legal theory, i.e. "interest is a conscious need to satisfy a need", is wrongly absolutized. Excessive psychologization of modern legal definitions of interest leads to a direct identification of interests with needs, puts an equal sign between these far from close concepts. It is shown that the widespread use of psychological terminology in legal definitions of interest (In particular, the terms "awareness" and "comprehension"), does not bring any "freshness" in legal knowledge about interests. The vast majority of phenomena, objects, and events in everyday and scientific speech are not considered to be conscious, since the awareness of these phenomena is self-evident. The doctrinal definitions of interests that exist in legal science and highlight their "awareness" as the main feature are practically unsuitable for law enforcement. The author substantiates the conclusion that the widely used legal concept of "interest" needs to be freed from the excessive psychologization of its many meanings, which will, in turn, free itself from the understanding of a conscious need as the only reason for the emergence of interest. It is suggested that the definition of "interest" should be formulated not on specific types or often synonymous meanings of this concept, but on generalizations of a higher order — such as could organically include all currently existing definitions of interest. Only universals can do this. And such a universal is the concept of "well-being".

About the Author

A. G. Malinova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Anna G. Malinova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Andreev DL. Roza Mira: Knigi I-VII [Rose of the World: Books I-VII]. Moscow: Profizdat; 2006. (In Russ.)

2. Baranov VM, Pershin IV, Pershina IV. Zakonnyy interes: opyt postroeniya teorii (Kriticheskie zametki na monografiyu A. V. Malko i V. V. Subocheva «Zakonnye interesy kak pravovaya kategoriya» (SPb., 2004. — 359 s.)) [Legal interest: The experience of constructing a theory (Critical notes on the monograph by A. V. Malko and V. V. Subochev "Legal interests as a legal category" (St. Petersburg, 2004 — 359 p.))]. Philosophy of law. 2005;3:98-103. (In Russ.)

3. Burmistrova SA. Ob obektivnom i subektivnom v pravovoy prirode interesa [On the objective and subjective in the legal nature of interest]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Series: Law. 2018;18(1):54-59. (In Russ.)

4. Bacon F. Novyy Organon. Sochineniya: v 2 t. [The New Organon. Works: in 2 vols]. 2nd ed., rev. and suppl. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl; 1978. (In Russ.)

5. Vakulina GA. Strakhovoy interes kak kategoriya strakhovogo prava [Insurance interest as a category of insurance law]. Izvestiya of IGEA [Bulletin of Baikal State University]. 2012;6(86):105-106. (In Russ.)

6. Vezhbitskaya A. Semanticheskie universalii i opisanie yazykov [Semantic universals and description of languages]. Translated from English. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury; 1999. (In Russ.)

7. Vladimirov YuS. Predislovie redaktora [Foreword of the editor]. Makh E. Poznanie i zabluzhdenie. Ocherki po psikhologii issledovaniya [Knowledge and delusion. Essays on research psychology]. Moscow: Binom; 2003. (In Russ.)

8. Barishpolets V, Barishpolets D, Manilov V. Geopolitika: Populyarnaya entsiklopediya [Geopolitics: A popular encyclopedia]. Moscow: Terra — Book club; 2002. (In Russ.)

9. Gongalo BM. Mysli i rechi o nauke grazhdanskogo prava [Thoughts and speeches about the science of civil law]. Tsivilisticheskie zapiski: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Civil notes: Interuniversity collection of scientific papers]. Issue 2. Moscow: Statut. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Private Law; 2002. (In Russ.)

10. Ivanov PI. Psikhologiya (V kratkom izlozhenii): ucheb. posobie dlya uchitelskikh institutov [Psychology (In brief): Course book for teaching profession]. Tashkent: Gosizdat UzSSR; 1946. (In Russ.)

11. Ilin IA. Obshchee uchenie o prave i gosudarstve. Sobranie sochineniy: v 10 t [General doctrine of law and the state. Collected works: in 10 vols.]. Vol. 4. Moscow: Russkaya kniga; 1994. (In Russ.)

12. Titarenko ML, editor. Istoriya kitayskoy filosofii [History of Chinese philosophy]. Translated from Chinese. Moscow: Progress; 1989. (In Russ.)

13. Kuszhanova AZh. Problema interesa v sfere obrazovaniya (filosofsko-metodologicheskiy analiz) [The problem of interest in education (philosophical and methodological analysis)]. Teoreticheskiy zhurnal CREDO. 2000;4. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: Credo-new.ru. (In Russ.)

14. Losev AF. Dilektika mifa [Dialectics of myth]. Tago-Godi AA, Troitskiy VP, editors. Moscow: Mysl; 2001. (In Russ.)

15. Lyubutin KN, Kondrashov PN. Dialektika povsednevnosti: metodologicheskiy podkhod [Dialectics of everyday life: A methodological approach]. Ekaterinburg: UrGU — IFIP Uro RAN — RFO; 2007. (In Russ.)

16. Malinova AG. Kategoriya «interes» v semeynom prave: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Category "interest" in family law. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Ekaterinburg; 2003. (In Russ.)

17. Malinova AG. Ponyatie «zakonnye interesy» v semeynom prave [The concept of "legitimate interests" in family law]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Juridical Journal]. 2001;1:62-65. (In Russ.)

18. Malko AV. Zakonnye interesy sovetskikh grazhdan: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Legitimate interests of Soviet citizen. Author’s Abstract of Cand. Sci.(Law) Thesis]. Saratov; 1985. (In Russ.)

19. Malko AV. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave. Teoretiko-informatsionnyy aspekt: monografiya [Incentives and restrictions in the right. Information-theoretical aspect: A monograph]. Saratov: SSU publishing house; 1994. (In Russ.)

20. Malko AV. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave [Incentives and restrictions in the law]. 2nd ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow: Yurist; 2003. (In Russ.)

21. Malko AV. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave [Incentives and restrictions in the law]. 3rd ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow: Yurist; 2012. (In Russ.)

22. Malko AV, Subochev VV. Zakonnye interesy kak pravovaya kategoriya [Legitimate interests as a legal category]. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press; 2004. (In Russ.)

23. Martyanova TS. Obyazatelstva po strakhovaniyu [Liability insurance]. In: Sukhanov EA, editor. Grazhdanskoe pravo: in 4 t. T. 4: Obyazatelstvennoe pravo: ucheb. dlya studentov vuzov [Civil law : in 4 vols. Vol. 4: Law of Obligations : A textbook for university students]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer; 2008. (In Russ.)

24. Mashtakov KM. Teoreticheskie voprosy razgranicheniya publichnogo i chastnogo prava: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. [Theoretical issues of differentiation of public and private law. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis. Author’s abstract]. Volgograd; 2001. (In Russ.)

25. Mikhaylov SV. Kategoriya interesa v grazhdanskom (chastnom) prave: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. [Category of interest in civil (private) law. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis. Author’s abstract]. Moscow; 2000. (In Russ.)

26. Orlanyuk-Malitska LA. Strakhovoy interes kak bazis razvitiya regionalnogo strakhovaniya [Insurable interest as a basis for the development of regional insurance]. Regionalnaya ekonomika i upravlenie [Regional economy and management]. 4(52). [cited 2020 March 19]. Available from: http://eee-region.ru/article/5201/ (In Russ.)

27. Parlament predostavil obezyanam prava cheloveka [Parliament granted monkeys human rights]. Uralskiy rabochiy [Ural worker]. 2008. July 3. (In Russ.)

28. Pasternak BL. Leytenant Shmidt [Lieutenant Schmidt]. [cited 2020 March 19]. Available from: https://pitzmann.ru/pasternak-lieutenant.htm (In Russ.)

29. Potrebnost [Need]. In: Sovetskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Soviet encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow: The Great Soviet Encyclopedia; 1985. P. 1044. (In Russ.)

30. Rozov MA. O granitsakh ratsionalnosti [On the limits of rationality]. Ratsionalnost na perepute: v 2 kn. [Rationality at the crossroads : in 2 books]. Book 1. Moscow: ROSSPEN; 1999. (In Russ.)

31. Rubinshteyn SL. Osnovy obshchey psikhologii: v 2 t. [Fundamentals of general psychology : in 2 vols.]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1989. (In Russ.)

32. Rubinshteyn SL. Osnovy obshchey psikhologii: v 2 t. [Fundamentals of general psychology : in 2 vols.]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1989. (In Russ.)

33. Saulyak OP, Ekimov AI. Spory vokrug zakonnykh interesov: Malko AV, Subochev VV. Zakonnye interesy kak pravovaya kategoriya [The controversy around the legitimate interests. Malko AV, Subochev VV. Legitimate interests as a legal category]. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press; 2004. Abstract. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence]. 2005;2:218-224. (In Russ.)

34. Sorokin PA. Prestuplenie i kara, podvig i nagrada: sotsiologicheskiy etyud ob osnovnykh formakh obshchestvennogo povedeniya i morali [Crime and punishment, feat and reward: a sociological study on the main forms of social behavior and morality]. Moscow: Astrel; 2006. (In Russ.)

35. Subochev VV. Zakonnye interesy [Legal interests]. Moscow: Norma; 2008. (In Russ.)

36. Khalafov EA. Interes kak obshchenauchnaya i pravovaya kategoriya [Interest as a general scientific and legal category]. Biznes v zakone [Business in Law]. 2015;4:7-11. (In Russ.)

37. Yadov VA. Potrebnosti [Needs]. Bolshaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya [The Great Soviet Encyclopedia]. 3rd ed. Vol. 20. Moscow: BSE; 1975. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Malinova A.G. Interest and Need: Critical Look at their Identification in Russian Law. Lex Russica. 2020;73(10):91-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.167.10.091-105

Views: 728


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)