The Origins of Limitation Period in the Old Russian Criminal Law

The prototype of the modern institution of limitation periods for criminal prosecution appears in old Russian law. The crime under it is of a private legal nature (offense), and the main punishment is revenge on the offender. The nascent state power requires limiting revenge, which is destructive in nature, although it continues to act as a natural reaction to deviant behavior. One of these restrictions is the establishment of a certain period during which it was allowed to take revenge with impunity. In different legal systems, this period is designated differently. In old Russian law, which was influenced by Byzantine legal practice, there was a demand for the legality of revenge only in case of immediate implementation, which brings it closer to the institution of necessary defense. This also shows the beginnings of the modern institution of limitation periods, since revenge at that time satisfied the goals of punishment. The analysis of the norms of Russkaya Pravda [Russian Justice] in comparison with the norms of ancient German law is a confirmation of this. In addition, the establishment of limitation periods in old Russian law in some cases had procedural prerequisites, which are also characteristic of the modern institution of limitation periods. Nevertheless, long-standing oblivion did not receive its further development in old Russian law. The most popular institution was monetary compensation, which not only effectively replaced revenge, but also provided an economic platform for the emerging state apparatus. In such circumstances, it was economically unprofitable to limit the payment of ransom as the main type of punishment for that period of time, and first of all directly to the state in the person of the princely power. Thus, in its historical development, the institution of limitation periods for criminal prosecution at the stage of old Russian law acquires its identity and significance only when comparing and disclosing those tasks that were solved by the state in this particular period of time by applying punishment.

limitation period, criminal prosecution, old Russian law, Russkaya Pravda, punishment, goals of punishment, restriction of revenge, ransom

1. Berner AF. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava. S primechaniyami, prilozheniyami i dopolneniyami po istorii russkogo prava i zakonodatelstvu polozhitelnomu N. Neklyudova: v 2 t. [Textbook of criminal law. With notes, appendices and additions on the history of Russian law and positive legislation N. Neklyudova: in 2 vols.]. Translated from Germ. Vol. 1: General part. St. Petersburg; 1865. (In Russ.)

2. Bystrikov AM, Asaenok BV. Prichiny i predposylki vozniknoveniya srokov davnosti privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave [Reasons and prerequisites for the emergence of the Statute of limitations for criminal liability in criminal law]. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Series D. 2017;5:189-194. (In Russ.)

3. Ashirova LM, Buryleva EV, Vasileva EG, et al. Vzaimosvyaz ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessualnogo prava: monografiya [The relationship of criminal and criminal procedure law: A monograph]. 2nd ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow: Prospekt; 2019. (In Russ.)

4. Georgievskiy EV. Obychnoe ugolovnoe pravo Drevney Germanii do obrazovaniya pervykh varvarskikh korolevstv [Ordinary criminal law of Ancient Germany before the formation of the first barbarian kingdoms]. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya [Journal of foreign legislation and comparative law]. 2014;2:314-326. (In Russ.)

5. Georgievskiy EV. Kharakteristika drevnerusskogo ugolovnogo zakona i prostranstvenno-vremennýkh printsipov ego deystviya [Characteristics of the old Russian criminal law and the space-time principles of its operation]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. 2013;371:125-132. (In Russ.)

6. Gryakalov NA. Lex Talionis. K fundamentalnoy antropologii taliona [Lex Talionis. Towards the fundamental anthropology of Talion]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya 17: Filosofiya. Konfliktologiya. Kultorologiya. Relogiovedenie [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 17: Philosophy. Conflictology. Culturology. Religious studies]. 2015;2:12-20. (In Russ.)

7. Domnikova VV. Razgranichenie prestupleniy i grazhdanskikh pravonarusheniy po Russkoy Pravde [Differentiation of crimes and civil offenses according to Russian Truth]. Vesnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser.11: Pravo [Bulletin of Moscow State University. Ser.11: Law]. 2013;3:88-97. (In Russ.)

8. Endoltseva AV. Institut osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: teoreticheskie, zakonodatel’nye i pravoprimenitel’nye problemy: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. [Institute of exemption from criminal liability: theoretical, legislative and law enforcement problems. Dr. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Author’s abstract]. Moscow; 2005. (In Russ.)

9. Esipov VV. Prestuplenie i nakazanie v drevnem prave [Crime and punishment in ancient law]. Warsaw; 1903. (In Russ.)

10. Ershov VV, Syrukh VM, editors. Istoriya suda i pravosudiya v Rossii: v 9 t. [History of the court and justice in Russia: in 9 vols.]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Norma; 2016. (In Russ.)

11. Korsakov KV. Model vozdayaniya v kriminologii i ugolovno-pravovoy doktrine [Model of retribution in criminology and criminal law doctrine]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2007. (In Russ.)

12. Kuznetsova NF, Tyazhkova IM, editors. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast : uchebnik dlya vuzov. T. 2: Uchenie o nakazanii. [The course on criminal law. General part: A textbook for universities. Vol. 2: The doctrine of punishment]. Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.)

13. Mackenzie T. Rimskoe pravo sravnitelno s zakonami Frantsii, Anglii i SHotlandii [Roman law in comparison with the laws of France, England and Scotland]. Translated from Eng. Moscow; 1864. (In Russ.)

14. Maksimeyko NN. Mnimye arkhaizmy ugolovnogo prava Russkoy Pravdy [Imaginary archaisms of criminal law of the Russian Justice]. Vestnik prava: Zhurnal Yiridicheskogo obshchestva pri Imperatorskom S.-Peterburgskom universitete. St. Petersburg; 1905. Book 3 (March). P. 135-161. (In Russ.)

15. Malikov SV. Vremya i sroki v ugolovnom prave Rossii: monografiya [Time and terms in the criminal law of Russia: A monograph]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2019. (In Russ.)

16. Nevolin KA. Istoriya rossiyskikh grazhdanskikh zakonov: v 3 t. T. 3: Kniga vtoraya ob imushchestvakh [The history of the Russian civil law: in 3 volumes. Vol. 3: Book 2. On Property]. St. Petersburg; 1851. (In Russ.)

17. Ocherki istorii russkogo prava. Istoriya ugolovnogo prava i sudoproizvodstva (po lektsiyam prof. M. Dyakonova) [Essays on the history of Russian law. History of criminal law and legal proceedings (lectures by Prof. M. Diakonov)]. Yuriev; 1905.

18. Zimin AA, Yushkov SV, editors. Pamyatniki russkogo prava: Pamyatniki prava Kievskogo gosudarstva, X-XII vv. [Monuments of Russian law: Monuments of rights of the Kievan state, the 10-11th centuries]. Issue 1. Moscow; 1952. (In Russ.)

19. Ponikhidin YuM. K voprosu o stanovlenii instituta neobkhodimoy oborony v russkom ugolovnom prave [On the question of the formation of the Institute of necessary defense in Russian criminal law]. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii [Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin]. 2012;2(84):14-21. (In Russ.)

20. Rossiyskoe zakonodatelstvo X-XX vekov: v 9 t. T. 1: Zakonodatelstvo Drevney Rusi [Russian legislation of the 10-11th centuries: in 9 vols. Vol. 1. Legislation of Old Russia]. Moscow: Yurid. lit.; 1984. (In Russ.)

21. Sabler VK. O znachenii davnosti v ugolovnom prave [On the meaning of the Statute of limitations in criminal law]. Moscow; 1872. (In Russ.)

22. Sagitdinova ZI. Institut davnosti prestupleniya po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Institute of prescription of crime in the criminal law of Russia: history and modernity. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis. Author’s Abstract]. Saratov; 2012. (In Russ.)

23. Sverchkov VV. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti, prekrashchenie ugolovnogo dela (presledovaniya), otkaz v ego vozbuzhdenii. Problemy teorii i praktiki [Exemption from criminal liability, termination of criminal proceedings (prosecution), refusal to initiate it. Problems of theory and practice]. St. Petersburg; 2008. (In Russ.)

24. Sergeevich VI. Lektsii i issledovaniya po drevney istorii russkogo prava [Lectures and research on the ancient history of Russian law]. St. Petersburg: M. M. Stasyulevich Publishing House; 1910. (In Russ.)

25. Sigalov KE. Stanovlenie prava vo vremeni [The formation of law in time]. Prostranstvo i vremya [Space and time]. 2011;4(6):104-112. (In Russ.)

26. Tagantsev NS. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo: v 2 t. [Russian criminal law: in 2 vols.]. Vol. 2. Tula: Avtograph; 2001. (In Russ.)

27. Tkachevskiy YuM. Davnost v sovetskom ugolovnom prave [Limitation period in the Soviet penal law]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta; 1978. (In Russ.)

28. Fedorov KG. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnykh stran [History of state and law of foreign countries]. Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU; 1977. (In Russ.)

29. Foynitskiy IYa. Uchenie o nakazanii v svyazi s tyurmovedeniem [The doctrine of punishment in connection with prison studies]. St. Petersburg: Tip. Ministerstva putey soobshcheniya (A. Benke); 1889. (In Russ.)

30. Chepik AV. Davnost kak yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya: teoretiko-pravovoy analiz: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Limitation period as a legal construction: theoretical and legal analysis. Can. Sci. (Law) Thesis. Author’s abstract]. Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.)

31. Shargorodskiy MD. Izbrannye raboty po ugolovnomu pravu [Selected works on criminal law]. St. Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press; 2003. (In Russ.)

32. Engels F. Proiskhozhdenie semi, chastnoy sobstvennosti i gosudarstva [Origin of the family, private property, and the state]. Moscow; 1973. (In Russ.)

33. Yanevich-Yanevskiy KYa. Ob ugolovnoy davnosti, v osobennosti po russkomu pravu [On the criminal time limitations, especially under Russian law]. Yuridicheskie zapiski [Legal notes]. Vol. 5. St. Petersburg; 1862. (In Russ.)