A Meta-Category “People” and Limits of Cognition in the Science of Constitutional Law

Based on approaches existing in domestic science to the interpretation of the term “a people”, the author concludes that in constitutional law the term under consideration is used in at least two different meanings: 1.as a source of power; and 2. as a subject of constitutional rights. The author highlights the irreducibility of this duality and substantiates the thesis that the concept of the people as a source of power is one of the limiting concepts of constitutional law and, therefore, cannot be defined within its framework. Awareness of this problem leads some Russian lawyers to denying the principle of popular sovereignty, and other scholars try to equate the concept of “a people as a source of power” with the concept of electoral corps. Arguing both these approaches, the author highlights that according to Gödel’s theorem on incompleteness, constitutional law as a system of formally defined norms cannot be complete and uncontroversial at the same time. Attempts to construct a “pure” constitutional-legal theory free of any extra-legal elements where definitions of all concepts the theory operates would be derived from the theory itself lead to intractable contradictions. If the system of constitutional law is built as non-contradictory, it is inevitably incomplete, in particular it uses concepts that cannot be defined within its framework. The author investigates such concepts and categories belonging to a higher level of abstraction as meta-categories, or marginal concepts, of the science of constitutional law. The category “the people as a source of power” is one of them. Concerning the dilemma of completeness and consistency of constitutional law as a system of formally defined norms, the author prioritizes consistency.

theory of state and law, constitutional law, constitution, people, population, power, source of power, voters, electorate, meta-category, marginal concept, limits of cognition, consistency

1. Avdeev DA. Izbirateli kak istochnik vlasti, ili Yuridicheskoe izmerenie kategorii «narod» [Voters as a source of power, or Legal dimension of the category “people”]. Sovremennoe pravo. 2015;11:25-30. (In Russ.)

2. Avdeev DA. rossiyskiy narod kak subekt konstitutsionnogo prava [The Russian People as a Subject of Constitutional Law]. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2017;11:14-17. (In Russ.)

3. Bartsitz IN. Konstitutsionnaya mifologiya: vozniknovenie, prednaznachenie i praktika primeneniya [Constitutional mythology: emergence, purpose and practice of application]. State and Law. 2018;12:56-70. (In Russ.)

4. Davydova ML, Bokov YuA. Mnogonatsionalnyy narod Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak istochnik gosudarstvennoy vlasti subekta rf: za i protiv [The multinational people of the Russian Federation as a source of state power of the subject of the Russian Federation: for and against]. Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Jurisprudence. 2019;1:101-111. (In Russ.)

5. Denisov SA. Realnoe gosudarstvennoe pravo sovremennoy rossii [Real State Law of Modern Russia]. Vol. 2. Ekaterinburg; 2016. (In Russ.)

6. Egorshina OP, Zatsepa OO. Narod kak istochnik gosudarstvennoy vlasti [A people as a source of state power]. Administrative Consulting. 2010;1:43-49. (In Russ.)

7. Ivanov IV. Suverenitet mnogonatsionalnogo naroda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [The sovereignty of the multinational people of the Russian Federation. Questions of Theories and Applications]. Moscow: Rusains Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.)

8. Ivanov VV. Teoriya gosudarstva [Theory of the State]. Moscow: State University Publishing House — Higher School of Economics; 2010. (In Russ.)

9. Lobovikov VO. Problema nepolnoty formalno opredelennykh sistem norm pozitivnogo prava, pervaya teorema gedelya o nepolnote i yuridicheskie fiktsii kak vazhnyy komponent yuridicheskoy tekhniki [The problem of incompleteness of formally defined systems of norms of positive law, Gödel’s first theorem on incompleteness and legal fictions as an important component of legal technology]. Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the MIA of Russia [Nauchnyi vestnik Omskoi akademii MVD Rossii]. 2013;2(49):53-57. (In Russ.)

10. Snitko TN. Predelnye ponyatiya v zapadnoy i vostochnoy lingvokulturakh : avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk [Marginal concepts in Western and Eastern linguocultures: Author’s Abstract]. Pyatigorsk; 1999. (In Russ.)

11. Fan IB. Politicheskaya ontologiya rossiyskogo grazhdanina: soderzhanie protiv formy [Political ontology of the Russian citizen: content against form]. Yekaterinburg; 2018. (In Russ.)

12. Cherepanov VA. My, mnogonatsionalnyy narod Rossiyskoy Federatsii... [We, the multinational people of the Russian Federation...]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Сonstitutional Review]. 2018;5:126-137. (In Russ.)

13. Cherepanov VA. Narod i gosudarstvo: o doktrinalnom tolkovanii konstitutsionnoy modeli [People and the State: on the Doctrinal Interpretation of the Constitutional Model]. Journal of Russian Law. 2019;1:129-141. (In Russ.)