Component Elements of a Crime as an Ontological Reality of Unknown Existence

The paper deals with methodological problems of understanding the component elements of a crime in the doctrine and modern science of criminal law. The author analyzes the philosophical approaches to determining the essence of this phenomenon, the influence of the classical school of criminal law on the formation of such concepts as "crime" and "component elements of a crime", reveals the prerequisites and reasons for the multilevel understanding of the component elements of a crime in pre-revolutionary and Soviet criminal law. The ratio between the crime and the component elements of a crime is revealed (based on the features of these legal concepts) and questions are raised about the non-identical understanding of the same phenomena in criminal law. The author states that the component elements of a crime cannot be identified with the concept of "crime" and is the basis for criminal liability. The component elements are always a legislative (regulatory) model, not a reality. The reality is only a committed crime, which entails the emergence of the relevant legal relations. In conflict social relations characterized by the commission of an illegal criminal act, the crime itself exists, but not the component elements of this crime. The author suggests that the component elements should be distinguished within the scope of the crime’s illegality, rather than the crime as a whole. From this point of view, it is proved that the disposition of the criminal law norm determines the model of a specific illegal act and its features (objective and subjective), since in real life the composition is associated with those features that are described in the disposition of the legal norm. The disposition does not replace the component elements, on the contrary, the component elements of illegality are revealed in the disposition of the criminal law norm. Research methods used in the course of the study are as follows: formal dogmatic, historical legal, comparative legal.

1. Podroykina AI. Aktualnye problemy ugolovnogo prava [Current issues of criminal law]. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.)

2. Budzinskiy S. Nachala ugolovnogo prava [The beginning of criminal law]. Warsaw; 1870. (In Russ.)

3. Velikoselskaya IG. Sostav pravonarusheniya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Componenet elements of a crime. Author’s abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Kazan; 2010. (In Russ.)

4. Golovenkov PV. Ugolovnoe ulozhenie (Ugolovnyy kodeks) Federativnoy Respubliki Germaniya: nauchnoprakticheskiy kommentariy i perevod teksta zakona [Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany: Scientific and practical commentary and translation of the law]. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.)

5. Gontar IYa. Kontseptsiya sostava prestupleniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: slozhivsheesya ponimanie i perspektiva dalneyshego razvitiya [The concept of corpus delicti in Russian criminal law: Current understanding and prospects for further development]. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence]. 2008;3:41-51. (In Russ.)

6. Gontar IYa. Prestuplenie i sostav prestupleniya kak yavleniya i ponyatiya v ugolovnom prave [A Crime and Component Elements of a Crime as Phenomena and Concepts in Criminal Law]. Vladivostok; 1997. (In Russ.)

7. Zhalinskiy AE. Sovremennoe nemetskoe ugolovnoe pravo [Modern German criminal law]. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.)

8. Ivanchin AV. Sostav prestupleniya [Component elements of a crime]. Yaroslavl; 2011. (In Russ.)

9. Kistyakovskiy AF. Elementarnyy uchebnik obshchego ugolovnogo prava [Elementary textbook on general criminal law]. St. Petersburg; 1875. (In Russ.)

10. Kozlov AP. Avtorskiy kurs ugolovnogo prava. Chast Obshchaya [Author’s Course on Criminal Law. General Part]. Book 1. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.)

11. Korobeev AI, Lun Chanhai. Filosofskie osnovy ucheniya o chetyrekhelementnom sostave prestupleniya [Philosophical foundations of the doctrine of the four-element composition of crime]. Sovremennoe pravo [Modern law]. 2010;2:25-28. (In Russ.)

12. Krieger G. Sostav prestupleniya i ego znachenie [Component elements of a crime and their significance]. Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1982;6:8-9. (In Russ.)

13. Krylova NE. Diskussionnye voprosy ucheniya o sostave prestupleniya [Discussion questions of the doctrine of the component elements of a crime]. Vestnik MGU. Seriya 11: Pravo [The Moscow University Herald Series 11: Law]. 2012;4:26-43. (In Russ.)

14. Kuznetsova NF. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy [Problems of crime classification]. Moscow; 2007. (In Russ.)

15. Kuznetsova NF, Jiang Huilin. Teoriya o sostave prestupleniya v Kitae i Rossii [Theory on the component elements of a crime in China and Russia]. Vestnik MGU. Seriya 11: Pravo [The Moscow University Herald Series 11: Law]. 2009;6:62-74. (In Russ.)

16. Lopashenko NA. Sootnoshenie prestupleniya i sostava prestupleniya [The ratio of the crime and the components elements of a crime]. In: Rarog AI, editor. Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: Materialy 4-y Mezhdunar. nauch. prakt. konferentsii [Criminal law: Development strategy in the 21st century: Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Moscow; 2007. (In Russ.)

17. Long Chang Hai. Uchenie o sostave prestupleniya po ugolovnomu pravu KNR i Rossii: sravnitelno-pravovoe issledovanie: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [The doctrine of the component elements of a crime under the criminal law of the PRC and Russia: Comparative legal research: Author’s Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Vladivostok; 2009. (In Russ.)

18. Lyapunov Yu. Sostav prestupleniya: gnoseologicheskiy i sotsialno-pravovoy aspekty [Component elements of a crime: Epistemological and socio-legal aspects]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2005;5:44-48. (In Russ.)

19. Morozov VI, Losev SG. Ponyatie sostava prestupleniya v otechestvennoy teorii ugolovnogo prava [The concept of corpus delicti in the Russian theory of criminal law]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitelnaya praktika [Legal science and law enforcement practice]. 2017;2:16-21. (In Russ.)

20. Muravlyanskiy AV, Bolshakova EV. Uchenie o sostave prestupleniya kak osnova kvalifikatsii prestupleniya [The doctrine of the component elements f a crime as the basis for the classification of a crime]. Evraziyskiy soyuz uchenykh. Seriya: Yurid. nauki [Eurasian Union of Scientists. Series: Legal Sciences]. 2016;3:32-34. (In Russ.)

21. Piontkovskiy AA. Uchenie o prestuplenii po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [A Study on a Crime according to the Soviet Criminal Law]. Moscow; 1961. (In Russ.)

22. Sverchkov VV. Sootnosheniy ponyatiy «sostav prestupleniya», «prestuplenie» i «prestupnoe posyagatelstvo» [Relations between the concepts of "component elements of a crime", "crime" and "criminal encroachment"]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2012;17:254-257. (In Russ.)

23. Sirik MS. Sostav prestupleniya kak pravovaya kategoriya [Component elements of a crime as a legal category]. Zakon i zhizn [Law and life]. 2018;3:64-72. (In Russ.)

24. Tagantsev NS. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo (lektsii) [Russian criminal law (Lectures)]. St. Petersburg; 1902. Vol.1. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

25. Traynin AN. Obshchee uchenie o sostave prestupleniya [General doctrine of the component elements of a crime]. Moscow; 1957. (In Russ.)

26. Kozochkin ID. Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. Obshchaya chast [Criminal law of foreign countries. General part]. Moscow; 2003. (In Russ.)

27. Rarog AI, editor. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast [Criminal law of the Russian Federation. General part]. Moscow; 2002. (In Russ.)

28. Kozachenko IYa, editor. Ugolovnoe pravo: Obshchaya chast [Criminal law: General part]. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.)

29. Kudryavtsev VN, Kelin SG, editors. Ugolovnyy zakon. Opyt teoreticheskogo modelirovaniya [Criminal law. Experience of theoretical modeling]. Moscow; 1987. (In Russ.)

30. Komissarov VS, Korobeev AI, Heh Benson, editors. Uchenie o sostave prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave Rossii i Kitaya: sravnitelno-pravovoe issledovanie [The doctrine of the component elements of a crime in the criminal law of Russia and China: Comparative legal research]. St.Petersburg; 2009. (In Russ.)

31. Filimonov VD. Voploshchenie genezisa prestupleniya v pravovom soderzhanii sostava prestupleniya [Embodiment of the genesis of the crime in the legal content of the components elements of a crime]. Ugolovnaya yustitsiya [Criminal justice]. 2018;12:40-45. (In Russ.)

32. Filchenko AP. Razvitie predstavleniy o sostave prestupleniya kak osnovanii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v otechestvennom ugolovnom prave [Development of ideas about the component elements of a crime as the basis for criminal liability in domestic criminal law]. Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta [Bulletin of Vladimir Law Institute]. 2013;3:190-195. (In Russ.)

33. Frister G. Ugolovnoe pravo Germanii. Obshchaya chast [Criminal Law. General part]. Moscow; 2013. (In Russ.)

34. Khilyuta VV. Globalnaya instrumentalizatsiya ugolovnogo prava [Global instrumentalization of criminal law]. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.)