Law and Information Technologies in Modern Conditions of Globalization

The author considers various aspects of the use of information technologies in the context of globalization in cross-border private law relations. Separately, the issues of determining the law applicable to relations implemented using information technologies (Internet sites, blockchain technologies, mobile applications), the problems of jurisdiction are analyzed. The legal approaches of the Russian Federation, the United States, the EU, and the People's Republic of China are examined. Special attention is given to both the normative legal approaches adopted in these countries, as well as law enforcement practice, decisions and comments of the highest courts. Blockchain technology is analyzed as the most effective information technology that leads to e-commerce processes optimization, ensures the immutability of data in the system and their safe storage and processing. The paper discusses the latest Russian legislation on digital financial assets and digital currency, which can be created based on blockchain technology. It is noted that by recognizing the digital currency as a means of payment, but not recognizing it as a monetary unit, the Russian legislator creates an ambiguous legal field and, in fact, leaves the law enforcement authorities the right to decide on the perception of the digital currency as a specific object of civil rights, sharing it with the concept of a digital financial asset. Through the prism of the influence of the technological environment on the regulation of cross-border private law relations, the principle of technological neutrality is considered. There is a tendency to deviate from the principle of technological neutrality, to develop self-regulatory activities, regulatory mechanisms within the technological environment, to the need to take into account the technology of implementation of relations (which characterizes a particular "state affiliation" of relations) when determining the applicable law, jurisdiction over disputes arising from crossborder relations.

1. Getman-Pavlova IV. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik [Private international law: A textbook]. 3rd ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow: Eksmo; 2011. (In Russ.)

2. Kozinets NV. Problema kollizionno-pravovogo regulirovaniya otnosheniy, voznikayushchikh v sfere transgranichnoy elektronnoy torgovli [The problem of conflict-of-laws regulation of relations arising in the field of cross-border electronic trade]. Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Business in law. Economic and legal journal]. 2015;6. (In Russ.)

3. Marchenko MN. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik [Theory of state and law: A textbook]. 2nd ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow: Prospect; 2016. (In Russ.)

4. Monastyrskiy YuE. Gospodstvuyushchie doktriny kollizionnogo prava v SSh: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Dominating doctrines of conflict of laws in the USA. Candidate Degree Thesis. Author's abstract]. Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.)

5. Nepeyvoda N. Pravosudie na konchikakh paltsev: opyt KNR [Justice at your fingertips: the experience of the people's Republic of China] [Internet]. 2020 May 05. Available from: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/5/2/pravosudie_na_konchikah_palcev_opyt_knr_83633 [cited 2020 Aug 26]. (In Russ.)

6. Khusainov RI. Mezhdunarodnaya yurisdiktsiya v sporakh o narushenii natsionalnykh i unitarnykh prav na tovarnye znaki v Internete. Opyt Evropeyskogo Soyuza [International jurisdiction in disputes concerning infringement of national and unitary trademark rights on the Internet. Experience of the European Union]. Zhurnal Suda po intellektualnym pravam [Intellectual Property Rights Court]. 2018;2:85-93. (In Russ.)

7. Shakhnazarov BA. Kompleksnaya vzaimosvyaz blokcheyn-tekhnologii i obektov intellektualnoy sobstvennosti v transgranichnykh chastnopravovykh otnosheniyakh [Complex interrelation of blockchain technology and intellectual property objects in cross-border private law relations]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics]. 2019;5:121-147. (In Russ.)

8. Bucher A. La dimension sociale du droit international prive. Cours general. ADI-Poche; 2011. (In Fr.)

9. Kraus D, Obrist T, Hari O. Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organisations and the Law. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2019. (In Eng.)

10. Munoz-Lopez JE. Internet Conflict of Laws: A Space of Opportunities for ODR. 14 International Law, Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional. 2009. (In Eng.)

11. Reidenberg JR. Technology and Internet Jurisdiction. 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=691501 [cited 2020 Aug 26]. (In Eng.)

12. Rohrmann CA, Rocha FS, Cunha J. Some legal aspects of cloud computing contracts. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology. 2015;10(1). (In Eng.)

13. Van der Hof S. Party Autonomy and International Online Business-to-Business Contracts in Europe and the United States Legal Aspects of an E-Commerce Transaction International. Conference in The Hague 26 and 27 October 2004. (In Eng.)

14. Wagner J. China's Cybersecurity Law: What You Need to Know [Internet]. Available from: https://thediplomat.com/2017/06/chinas-cybersecurity-law-what-you-need-to-know/ [cited 2020 Aug 26]. (In Eng.)

15. Wright A, De Filippi P. Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptography [Internet]. 2015 March 10. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2580664 [cited 2020 Aug 31]. (In Eng.)