Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Analysis of Fairness of Personal Income Taxation in the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.17803/17295920.2021.172.3.082-094

Abstract

The paper explores the issue of fairness of progressive taxation. The introduction of progressive taxation in the Russian Federation in 2021 was announced by the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin in his Address to citizens on June 23, 2020. The issue of returning to progressive taxation has been repeatedly raised in the scientific community, and one argument in its favor was the provision that progressive taxation is more fair than proportional taxation. At the same time, as Putin’s words suggest, the main goal of the introduction of tax progression is to find funds for financing certain projects, but not to achieve justice. However, the task set by the President does not exclude the need to investigate the issue of fairness of progressive taxation and the doctrinal justification of the proposed changes, which makes the chosen topic relevant.

The paper deals with the essence of “fair taxation” on the basis of the theories of justice, developed by John Rawls and Amartya Sen, and principles of taxation. The author analyzes the Federal Law of November 23, 2020, No. 372-FZ “On Amendments to Part Two of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in Part Concerning Taxation of Personal Income Exceeding 5 Million Rubles for the Tax Period” that introduces application of a combined tax rate to the income exceeding 5 million rubles per year, as well as the issue of prospects for further changes in personal income taxation in the Russian Federation in the context of achieving justice. Methodologically, the paper is based on the principles of the dialectical approach. The author applies general scientific methods of cognition, namely: analysis, synthesis, generalization, induction.

Based on the principles of taxation and several approaches to the interpretation of fairness, it is concluded that progressive taxation is more fair than the ones in force until 2020, including proportional taxation. The author proposes amendments to the Tax Code of the Russian Federation aimed at enhancing fairness of taxation. They include intensification of tax progressiveness (taking into account amendments entering into effect on January 1, 2021) and the introduction of a tax-free minimum on personal income.

About the Author

L. A. Yulgusheva
FBK Legal
Russian Federation

Lilia Sh. Yulgusheva, Cand. Sci. (Economics), Senior Consultant

ul. Myasnitskaya, d. 48, pom. 1, Moscow, Russia, 107078 



References

1. Aristotle. Etika. Moscow; 2010 (In Russ.).

2. Vekhi ekonomicheskoy mysli. T. 4 [Milestones of economic thought, Vol. 4]. In: Zaostrovtsev AP, editor. Economy of Welfare and Public Choice. St. Petersburg; 2004 (In Russ.).

3. Vinnitskiy IE. Rol spravedlivosti i zakonnosti v obespechenii tselostnosti i ustoychivosti sistemy printsipov prava [The role of justice and legality in ensuring the integrity and stability of the system of principles of law]. History of State and Law. 2011;13:14-17 (In Russ.).

4. Glukhovskiy YaYu. Printsip spravedlivosti v nalogooblozhenii: proshloe i nastoyashchee [The principle of fairness in taxation: past and present]. In: Karaseva MV, editor. Modern Problems of Tax Law Theory: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Voronezh: VSU Publ.; 2007 (In Russ.).

5. Demin AV. o sorazmernosti nalogooblozheniya [On the proportionality of taxation]. LRS “ConsultantPlus”.

6. Eremenko EA. Kontseptsiya spravedlivosti v nalogooblozhenii i ee vliyanie na sovershenstvovanie natsionalnoy nalogovoy sistemy : dis. ... kand. ekon. nauk : 08.00.10 [The concept of fairness in taxation and its impact on the improvement of the national tax system: PhD Thesis: 08.00.10]. Moscow; 2017 (In Russ.).

7. Kashin VA. O nalogooblozhenii dokhodov grazhdan [On taxation of citizens’ income]. Finance. 2012;8:40-44 (In Russ.).

8. Knyazev YuK. Spravedlivost i ekonomika [Justice and Economics]. Society and Economics. 2012;1:33-62 (In Russ.).

9. Krasnova IA. Florentiyskoe obshchestvo vo vtoroy polovine XIII — XIV v.: grandy i popolany, «dobrye» kuptsy i rytsari [Florentine Society in the second half of the 13th — 14th centuries: grandees and popolans, “good” merchants and knights]. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives Publ.; 2018 (In Russ.).

10. Kucherov II. Spravedlivost nalogooblozheniya i ee sostavlyayushchie (pravovoy aspekt) [Fairness of taxation and its constituents (legal aspect)]. Financial Law. 2009;4:24-28 (In Russ.).

11. Manushin DV. Utochnenie suti nalogovogo protivorechiya i mery po ego oslableniyu v usloviyakh krizisa: borba s tenevoy ekonomikoy i perekhod na spravedlivye pravila nalogooblozheniya [Clarification of the essence of tax contradiction and measures to weaken it in the conditions of crisis: struggle against the shadow economy and transition to fair taxation rules]. International Accounting. 2018;1-2:103-120 (In Russ.).

12. Ovcharova LN, editor. Monitoring sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo polozheniya i sotsialnogo samochuvstviya naseleniya. Aprel 2020 [Monitoring the social and economic situation and social well-being of the population. April, 2020]. Moscow: HSE Publ.; 2020 (In Russ.).

13. Muromtsev SA. Opredelenie i osnovnoe razdelenie prava [Definition and basic division of law]. Moscow: Type. Mamontov and Ko Publ.; 1879 (In Russ.).

14. . Napso MB. Nalogovye novatsii v kontekste realizatsii printsipov nalogooblozheniya [Tax innovations in the context of implementation of the principles of taxation]. Sovremennoe pravo. 2020;4:67-73 (In Russ.).

15. Ozhegov SI. Slovar russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of the Russian Language]. 8th ed. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk Publ.; 1986 (In Russ.).

16. Pepelyaev SG. Podokhodnyy nalog — printsipy i struktura [Income tax — principles and structure]. Moscow: “Contact” Audit Firm Publ.; 1993 (In Russ.).

17. Pecherskaya NV. Sovremennyy diskurs spravedlivosti: Dzhon Rolz ili Maykl Uolzer [Modern fairness discourse: John Rawls or Michael Walzer?]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. 2001;2:77-88 (In Russ.).

18. Plato. Gosudarstvo [The State]. Moscow; 2016 (In Russ.).

19. Rol D. Teoriya spravedlivosti [Theory of fairness]. Tr. from Eng.: Tselishchev AV, with the participation of Karpovich VN, Shevchenko AA. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk University Publ.; 1995 (In Russ.).

20. Svirshchevskiy A. Podokhodnyy nalog [Income Tax]. Moscow: Mamontov and Ko Publ.; 1886 (In Russ.).

21. Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [Research on the nature and causes of wealth of peoples]. Moscow; 1935 (In Russ.).

22. Sokolov AA. Teoriya nalogov [Theory of taxes]. Moscow; 2003 (In Russ.).

23. Khimicheva NI , Belikov EG. Printsip spravedlivosti v pravovom regulirovanii nalogooblozheniya dokhodov fizicheskikh lits [The principle of fairness in legal regulation of taxation of personal income]. Nalogi. 2016;2:4548 (In Russ.).

24. Chirkin VE. Sotsialnaya spravedlivost kak faktor ustoychivogo razvitiya obshchestva (konstitutsionnye voprosy) [Social justice as a factor of sustainable development of society (constitutional issues)]. Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2017;11:1:89-97 (In Russ.).

25. Glossary of Tax Terms. URL: http://www.oecd.org/ctp/glossaryoftaxterms.htm (accessed: Oct. 1, 2020).


Review

For citations:


Yulgusheva L.A. Analysis of Fairness of Personal Income Taxation in the Russian Federation. Lex Russica. 2021;74(3):82-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/17295920.2021.172.3.082-094

Views: 32081


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)