The Perpetrator of the Crime in Complicity and without Complicity: A Universal Role in the Diversity of Legal Constructions

A comprehensive study of the perpetrator’s role leads to the following conclusions: “perpetrator of the crime” is a universal term used to describe an act that constitutes an objective element of the crime committed both in complicity and without complicity. Four alternatives to the actions of the perpetrator exist: executor who performed the objective element alone, an accomplice who performed the objective element with other accomplices, an indirect perpetrator, an indirect accomplice. Other ways to qualify person’s act as a perpetrator are based not on the law, but on the recommendations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation that de facto acquired the status of the provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (joint participation in the organized group, joint participation in a crime with “technical distribution of roles”). The main element of the act of the perpetrator includes the fulfillment of the objective element described in the disposition of the article of the Special Part. The content of the objective element of a particular crime does not depend on the existence of complicity, hence the term “perpetrator” is applicable to any crime and has a universal value. It is impractical to describe in the law the same acts in different terms. “Technical distribution of roles” is a doctrinal term. Its content is disclosed in some resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the RF. Extensive interpretation of the term “perpetrator” in crimes with “technical distribution of roles” is a forced measure on the part of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, since the term “the group of persons in conspiracy” is interpreted restrictively. This interpretation complicates the application of the criminal law and does not allow us to adequately assess the greater risk of crimes committed in complicity. The term “technical distribution of roles” does not have a universal (acknowledged) interpretation in jurisprudence, which also makes it difficult to apply the law. Joint participation in a legal sense in crimes committed by an organized group is a construct that is not based on law applied to crimes with a special subject, which contradicts part 4, Art. 34 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

1. Arutyunov AA. Voprosy posredstvennogo ispolnitelstva pri souchastii v prestuplenii [Issues of indirect performance with complicity in crime]. Advocatskaya praktika. 2002;2 (In Russ.).

2. Grishaev PI, Kriger GA. Souchastie po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [Complicity in Soviet criminal law]. Moscow; 1959 (In Russ.).

3. Dal VI. Tolkovyy slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka : v 4 t. [Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language: in 4 vol]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Ripol Classic Publ.; 2006 (In Russ.).

4. Esakov GA, Rarog AI, Chuchaev AI. Rarog AI, editor. Nastolnaya kniga sudi po ugolovnym delam [Reference book of the judge in criminal cases]. Moscow: Velbi, Prospekt Publ.; 2007 (In Russ.).

5. Ivanov NG. Souchastie kak pravovoe yavlenie. ponyatie i priznaki souchastiya [Complicity as a legal phenomenon. The concept and signs of complicity]. Vol. 9: Complicity in crime. In: Criminal law. The general part. A Crime. Academic course: in 10 vol. Moscow; 2016 (In Russ.).

6. Karpova NA. Khishchenie chuzhogo imushchestva: voprosy kvalifikatsii i problemy differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti [Theft of someone else’s property: questions of qualification and problems of differentiation of criminal liability]. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya; 2011 (In Russ.).

7. Lunkov DA. Mesto i nazvanie instituta posredstvennogo prichineniya vreda trebuyut utochneniya [The place and name of the institute of indirect harm require clarification]. Russian Juridical Journal. 2011;5 (In Russ.).

8. Nikulin SI. Vidy souchastnikov prestupleniya [Types of accomplices in crime]. ol. 6: Complicity in crime. In: Encyclopedia of Criminal Law. St. Petersburg; 2007 (In Russ.).

9. Ozhegov SI, Shvedova NYu. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka : 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: 80,000 words and phraseological expressions]. 4th ed. Russian Academy of Sciences. Vinogradov Institute of the Russian Language. Moscow: Temp Publ.; 2006 (In Russ.).

10. Trainin AN. Uchenie o souchastii [The Doctrine on Complicity]. Moscow; 1941 (In Russ.).

11. Trukhin A. Obektivnaya storona souchastiya v prestuplenii [Objective element of complicity in crime]. Criminal Law. 2008;2 (In Russ.).

12. Inogamovoy-Khegay LV, rarog AI, Chuchaev AI. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast : uchebnik [Criminal law of the Russian Federation. General part: A Textbook]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Kontrakt, Infra-M Publ.; 2008 (In Russ.).

13. Ushakov DN. Tolkovyy slovar sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the modern Russian Language]. Moscow: Adelant Publ.; 2014 (In Russ.).

14. Sharapov RD. Souchastie v prestuplenii: zakon, teoriya, praktika [Complicity in a Crime: Law, Theory, Practice]. Lex russica. 2016;10 (In Russ.).

15. Shesler AV. souchastie v prestuplenii [Complicity in a Crime]. Novokuznetsk; 2014 (In Russ.).

16. Yanina IYu. O pravomernosti reglamentirovaniya posredstvennogo prichineniya v ramkakh glavy 7 «Souchastie v prestuplenii» Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [On the legality of regulating indirect infliction within the framework of Chapter 7 “Complicity in Crime” of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2016;6 (In Russ.).