Initiation of Criminal Proceedings against a Particular Person as the Ground for Recognizing him as a Suspect (para 1, part 1, art. 46 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation)

The paper is devoted to the analysis of a new ground for recognition of a person as a suspect, introduced under the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, namely, the initiation of a criminal case against the person. The ground under consideration has caused controversial debates among criminal process scholars. The author has carried out a retrospective analysis of the legislative regulation of this ground for giving a person the status of the suspect. The paper evaluates various doctrinal approaches to its merits and disadvantages. The author also demonstartes the need for the new ground for recognition of a person as the suspect in law enforcement on the basis of statistical data, according to which more than half of criminal cases in Russia are initiated against a particular person. The study at question reveals an interconnection between initiation of proceedings upon commission of a crime and a particular person. The conclusion is substantiated that the recognition of a person as a suspect in case of initiation of criminal proceedings against him is aimed at ensuring his right to protection from criminal prosecution. However, the issuance of the order to initiate criminal proceedings against a particular person entails the possibility of implementation of coercive criminal procedural measures against him. It is shown that suspicion forms the substantive basis of recognition of a person as the suspect. The author criticises the approach according to which the issuance of the order to initiate criminal proceedings against a particular person forms an allegation that he has committed an act prohibited under the criminal law. Under this approach the assumption is made that can later be either proven or refuted in the course of further investigation. The author criticises the practice of dividing criminal cases into a judicial perspective and lacking such a perspective, which entails violations of the rights and legitimate interests of individuals suspected in committing crimes.

1. Borovskiy E. Ponyatie podozrevaemogo v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [The concept of a suspect in the Soviet criminal process]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 11: Law. 1963:33-39 (In Russ.).

2. Borodin SV. Razreshenie voprosa o vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela [Resolution of the issue of initiation of criminal proceedings]. Moscow: VNII of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR Publ.; 1970 (In Russ.).

3. Zhogin NV, Fatkulin FN. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela [Initiation of criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ.; 1961 (In Russ.).

4. Zemlyanitsin EI. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «ugolovnoe presledovanie», «obvinenie», «podozrenie» i «predvaritelnoe rassledovanie» [On the question of the balance between the concepts of “criminal prosecution”, “prosecution”, “suspicion” and “preliminary investigation”]. Bulletin of Omsk Law Academy. 2013;2:126-129 (In Russ.).

5. Karneeva LM. Protsessualnoe polozhenie podozrevaemogo v svyazi s proektom UPK SSSR [The procedural status of the suspect in the draft Code of Criminal Procedure of the USSR]. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost. 1954;12:20-21 (In Russ.).

6. Kolokolov NA. Zaklyuchenie kollegii sudey o nalichii v deystviyakh litsa priznakov prestupleniya [Conclusion of the panel of judges on the presence of signs of crime in the actions of a perso]. Ugolovnyi protsess. 2007;4:30- 33 (In Russ.).

7. Larin AM. Rassledovanie po ugolovnomu delu: protsessualnye funktsii [Investigation in criminal case: procedural functions]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ.; 1986 (In Russ.).

8. Mazyuk RV Institut ugolovnogo presledovaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [The institute of Criminal Prosecution in Russian Criminal Procedure]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2009 (In Russ.).

9. Martynchik EG. UPK Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dostizheniya i nerealizovannye vozmozhnosti [The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: Achievements and Unrealized Opportunities]. The Russian Judge. 2002;4:3-6 (In Russ.).

10. Makhov VN. O podozrevaemom v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [On the suspect in the stage of initiation of criminal proceedings]. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019;1:155-157 (In Russ.).

11. Ovsyannikov VS, Ovsyannikov IV. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela v otnoshenii konkretnogo litsa: problemy i puti ikh resheniya [Initiation of criminal proceedings against a particular person: problems and ways of their solution]. Zakon. 2005;2:100-106 (In Russ.).

12. Ovsyannikov I. Ugolovno-protsessualnye garantii prav podozrevaemogo [Criminal procedural safeguards of the rights of a suspect]. Juridical World. 2005;10:51-56 (In Russ.).

13. Panyukov A. Protsessualnaya deyatelnost bez vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [Procedural activity without initiation of criminal proceedings]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003;5:51-53 (In Russ.).

14. Sementsov VA. Obespechenie prava na zashchitu litsu, v otnoshenii kotorogo vozbuzhdaetsya ugolovnoe delo [Ensuring the right to protection of the person in respect of whom a criminal case is initiated]. In: Sementsov VA. Selected Articles on Criminal Process. Krasnodar: Prosveshchenie-Yug Publ.; 2013 (In Russ.).

15. Strogovich MS. O podozrevaemom [On the suspect]. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost. 1961;2:33-38 (In Russ.).

16. Chupilkin YuB. Garantii prav podozrevaemogo v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Guarantees of the rights of a suspect in the Russian criminal trial. Author’s Abstract]. Krasnodar; 2001 (In Russ.).