Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

New Remote Work Regulations: Have Old Problems Been Solved?

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.175.6.036-045

Abstract

At the beginning of 2021, new norms came into force, completely revising the content of Ch. 49.1 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation concerning remote workers. Since 2020, the interest in this form of labor relations has acquired a feverish character due to the need to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic. The original text of the amendments was prepared for the State Duma by the Department of Labor Law and Social Security Law of Kutafin Moscow State Law University. However, it was deeply revised during the discussion by social partners. The paper evaluates how the new rules on remote work solve the key problems identified by experts in connection with this form of work. The author makes conclusions that, as a whole, the new norms, to a greater extent, reflect the interests of employers rather than employees. For the convenience of employers, rules have been adopted that provide for the unilateral temporary transfer of employees to remote work mode in emergency situations, for the recall of employees from remote to stationary ork mode, etc.

Unfortunately, the law failed to solve the urgent problem of securing the right of workers not to be in constant communication with the employer (“the right to disconnect”). The most important asset for workers is the exclusion from the Labor Code of the Russian Federation of the discriminatory right of employers in relation to remote workers to secure additional grounds for dismissal in an employment contract.

A number of significant problems in the legal regulation of remote work remained unsolved. We are talking about transnational and trans-regional remote work, when remote workers and their employers are located in different states or in different constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

About the Author

N. L. Lyutov
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Nikita L. Lyutov, Dr. Sci. (Law), Head of the Department of Labor Law and Social Security Law, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL); Professor at the School of Industrial Psychology and Human Resource Management, Northwestern University (Potchefstroom, South Africa)

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Vasilieva YuV, Shuraleva SV. Distantsionnaya rabota v Rossii: voprosy pravoprimeneniya [Remote Work in Russia: Issues of Law Enforcement]. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016;2:216-225. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-32-216-225. (In Russ.).

2. Izbienova TA, Averyanova MI. Balans rabochego vremeni i vremeni otdykha v usloviyakh udalennoy raboty [Balance of working time and Rest in Remote Working Conditions]. Voprosy trudovogo prava. 2020;6:44-57 (In Russ.).

3. Korshunova TYu. Dogovor o distantsionnoy rabote kak sposob oformleniya netipichnykh trudovykh otnosheniy [Remote work agreement as a way to formalize atypical labour relations]. Journal of Russian Law. 2020;2:112-125. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.021. (In Russ.).

4. Lyutov NL, Gerasimova ES. Mezhdunarodnye trudovye standarty i rossiyskoe zakonodatelstvo [International labor standards and Russian Legislation]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Center for Social and Labor Rights Publ., 2015 (In Russ.).

5. Nushtaikina KV. Realizatsiya prava rabotnikov na sotsialnoe partnerstvo v usloviyakh distantsionnogo truda [Realization of the right of workers for social partnership in conditions of the remote work]. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2013;3(21):152-156 (In Russ.).

6. Chernykh NV. Vliyanie netipichnykh form zanyatosti na teoreticheskie predstavleniya o trudovom otnoshenii (na primere norm o distantsionnom trude) [Impact of atypical forms of employment on theoretical concepts of the labor relation (case study of the norms regulating distance labor)]. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;8:108-117. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2019.105.8.108-117. (In Russ.).

7. Shuraleva SV. Regulirovanie distantsionnoy raboty s inostrannym elementom v epokhu globalizatsii: vzglyad s pozitsiy trudovogo prava Rossii [The regulation of distant work with a foreign element in the age of globalization: from the point of view of the Russian labor law]. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2014;3(25):156-163. (In Russ.).

8. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Overview of New Forms of Employment — 2018 Update. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2018. URL: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef18050en.pdf.

9. Gerasimova E, Korshunova T, Chernyaeva D. New Russian Legislation on Employment of Teleworkers: Comparative Assessment and Implications for Future Development. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2017;2:116-129. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2017.2.116.129.

10. Timellini C. Disconnection: A Right in a Phase of Progressive Definition // New Forms of Employment: Current Problems and Future Challenges. J. Wratny, A. Ludera-Ruszel (Eds.).Wiesbaden: Springer; 2020.


Review

For citations:


Lyutov N.L. New Remote Work Regulations: Have Old Problems Been Solved? Lex Russica. 2021;74(6):36-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.175.6.036-045

Views: 630


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)