Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Modern Trends in the Development of Private International Law and its Place in the Legal System

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.176.7.044-060

Abstract

The paper analyzes the current trends in the development of private international law, its relationship with international public law. Special attention is paid to the relationship between the public and the private in the regulation of cross-border private law relations, the concept of a polysystemic complex. The special role of the international civil process in the system of modern private international law is noted. Being implemented by law enforcement agencies, also in the context of the application of uniform conflict-of-law rules, the conflict-oflaws method of private international law vests with the public area due to its implementation. It is difficult to call the conflict-of-laws regulation a trend in private international law. The author highlights the international (crossborder) nature of private international law. Modern private international law is characterized by the presence of a symbiosis of traditional methods of state substantive and conflict-of-laws legal regulation and non-state regulation emanating from the subjects of private law relations, formed with due regard to the use of modern information technologies and often implemented in the digital environment, including with the use of non-state alternative methods of dispute resolution modernizing their forms with the development of technologies (the ODR, blockchain arbitration, the UDRP).
The paper highlights the formation of “cross-border private law” that is private in its own nature and in the context of the formation procedure which means that it comes from the subjects of private law. The author highlights such trends in the development of private international law in modern conditions as harmonization, primarily of electronic methods, of mechanisms for the implementation of private law relations; profiling of private international law within the framework of the activities of international organizations and cross-border self-regulatory organizations; orientation towards the uniform formation of private international law in the world and the expansion of its regulatory elements

About the Author

B. A. Shakhnazarov
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Beniamin A. Shakhnazarov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Private International Law

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Anufrieva LP. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik: v 3 t [International private law: textbook: in 3 volumes]. Moscow: Bek publ.; 2001. (In Russ.).

2. Boguslavsky MM. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo [International Private Law]. Moscow: Yuist Publ.; 1998. (In Russ.).

3. Voinikanis EA. Paradigmalnyy sdvig v sovremennom prave [Paradigm shift in modern law. Philosophy of Politics and Law. 2011. (In Russ.).

4. Goloskokov LV, Abakumova TI. Setevoe pravo i setevoe obshchestvo kak instrumenty obespecheniya investitsionnogo protsessa v sovremennoy Rossii [Network rules and the network society as tools for the investment process in modern Russia]. Public and Private Law. 2012;3. (In Russ.).

5. Zasemkova OF. Razreshenie sporov s pomoshchyu tekhnologii blokcheyn [Dispute Resolution By Means of Blockchain Technology]. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;4(1):16--167) DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.160-167. (In Russ.).

6. Kanashevsky VA. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik [Private international law: textbook]. 4th ed. Moscow: International Relations Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).

7. Kiskachi MA. Ispolzovanie printsipov unidrua v mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe v otsutstvie soglasheniya storon ob ikh primenenii [The use of the UNIDROIT Principles in international commercial arbitration in the absence of an agreement between the parties on their application]. Electronic Supplement to the Russian Juridical Journal. 2019;2. (In Russ.).

8. Kuznetsov MN. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo kak mezhsistemnaya sovokupnost pravovykh norm [Private international law as an intersystem set of legal norms]. In: Golubtsov VG, Kuznetsova OA (eds). 7th Perm Congress of Legal Scholars: Collection of Scientific Articles. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).

9. Luntz LA, Marysheva NI. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: v 3 t [The course of private international law: in 3 volumes]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ.; 1976. (In Russ.).

10. Majorina MV. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo v usloviyakh globalizatsii: ot razgosudarstvleniya k fragmentatsii [International private law in the context of globalization: from denationalization to fragmentation]. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2018;1. (In Russ.).

11. Dmitrieva GK (ed). Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik [International private law: textbook]. 4th ed. Moscow: Prospect Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

12. Mullerson RA. Sootnoshenie mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo, mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo i natsionalnogo prava [Correlation of international public, international private and national law]. The Soviet State and Law. 1982;2. (In Russ.).

13. Neshataeva TN. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnyy grazhdanskiy protsess: uchebnyy kurs: v 3 ch [Private international law and international civil process: training course: in 3 parts]. Moscow: Gorodets; 2004. (In Russ.).

14. Terentyeva LV. Razreshenie arbitrazhnymi tsentrami domennykh sporov po protsedure UDRp [Resolution of domain disputes by arbitration centers under the UDRP procedure]. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2014;4. (In Russ.).

15. Shakhnazarov BA. Kompleksnaya vzaimosvyaz blokcheyn-tekhnologii i obektov intellektualnoy sobstvennosti v transgranichnykh chastnopravovykh otnosheniyakh [Complex interconnection of blockchain technology and intellectual property in cross-border private law relations]. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2019;5. (In Russ.).

16. Cafaggi F. A analysis of transnational private comparative regulation: legitimacy, quality, effectiveness and enforcement. Available at: http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/acomparative-analysis-oftransnational-private-regulation-fcafaggi_12062014.pdf (Accessed: 01 Sept 2017).

17. Fernández Arroyo DP, Mbengue MM. Public and private international law in international courts and tribunals: evidence of an inescapable interaction. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 2018;56(4).

18. Goldmann M. A matter of perspective: Global governance and the distinction between public and private authority (and not law). Global Constitutionalism [March 2016].

19. Douglas MC, Bath V, Dickinson A, Keyes M. Commercial Issues in Private International Law: A Common Law Perspective (Studies in Private International Law). Hart Publishing; 2019.

20. Kulms R. Blockchains: Private Law Matters. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies. Mar. 2020.

21. Marzorati OJ. Book Abstract. Commercial Issues in Private International Law: A Common Law Perspective (Studies in Private International Law). Business Law International. 2020;1.

22. Mills A. Private international law and EU external relations: think local act global, or think global act local? International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 2016;65(3).


Review

For citations:


Shakhnazarov B.A. Modern Trends in the Development of Private International Law and its Place in the Legal System. Lex Russica. 2021;74(7):44-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.176.7.044-060

Views: 3232


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)