Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution as a Measure to Reduce the Workload on Courts: A Comparative Legal Study (Part 2)

The paper considers alternative methods of dispute resolution as a measure to reduce the workload on the courts. At present, the need to reduce the workload on courts is quite acute in Russia. According to the members of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), a large workload on courts (and, accordingly, on judges) seriously affects the quality of justice and the timing of the consideration of cases. It should be noted that all judicial systems of the world without exception face this problem, but the statistics of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) shows that over the past few years the burden on courts and judges has significantly decreased in the EU countries.

The authors summarize that foreign judicial practice has successfully tested working tools to reduce the burden on courts, which the Russian judicial system may well borrow. However, these tools require gradual development and elaboration given all Russian legal realities. A sharp transition to alternative dispute resolution may negatively affect the quality of dispute resolution in Russia. If the legislator restricts the ability of citizens to consider disputes in courts (for example, by increasing court fees), but at the same time alternative dispute resolution methods will remain at a low level of legal and social development (citizens’ distrust, weak legislative elaboration, etc.), then citizens will completely lose the platform for legal dispute resolution. It is quite possible that we will return to the criminal experience of the economy of the 1990s.

1. Ermakova EP, Ivanovskaya NV. Onlayn-razreshenie sporov s uchastiem potrebiteley v Evropeyskom Soyuze: dokumenty 2013 goda [Online dispute resolution involving consumers in the European Union: Documents of 2013]. Sovremennoe pravo [Modern law]. 2014;8. (In Russ.)

2. Kartashev MV. Praktikum prikaznogo sudoproizvodstva po grazhdanskim i torgovym delam v Rossii i Evropeyskom Soyuze [Case study of writ proceedings in civil and commercial cases in Russia and the European Union]. Zakon.ru. Available from: https://zakon.ru/blog/2016/09/26/praktikum_prikaznogo_ sudoproizvodstva_po_grazhdanskim_i_torgovym_delam_v_rossii_i_evropejskom_soyuze. (In Russ.)

3. Knyazev DV. Deystviya storon grazhdanskogo spora v sluchae obyazatelnosti mediatsii: analiz opyta SShA [Actions of the parties to a civil dispute in case of mandatory mediation: Analysis of the US experience]. Lex Russica. 2018;(10):130-145. (In Russ.)

4. Nelson R. Mirovye dostizheniya v oblasti razresheniya konfliktov [World achievements in the field of conflict resolution]. Treteyskiy sud [Arbitration court]. Available from: http://arbitrage.spb.ru/jts/2000/6/art07.html. (In Russ.)

5. Potapova EV. Formy dosudebnogo razresheniya kommercheskikh sporov v Evropeyskom Soyuze [Forms of pre-trial settlement of commercial disputes in the European Union]. Simvol nauki [A symbol of science]. 2017;10. (In Russ.)

6. Šijanski G, Barber J. The German order for payment procedure (Mahnverfahren). German Law Archive; 2006. Available from: https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=343 [cited 2021 Aug 1]. (In Eng.).