Elements of Precarious Employment in the Work of Scientifc and Pedagogical Workers

The paper highlights the problem of the growth of the segment of precarious employment in the work of researchers and the faculty, who work mainly in scientific and educational institutions (scientific and pedagogical workers). Besides the elements of precarious employment characteristic of the category of workers under consideration, the author considers the fixed-term nature of labor relations and the low level of the conditionally constant part of wages in the general structure of wages of scientific and pedagogical workers, which can be attributed to the legal prerequisites for the deterioration (precarization) of their labour regulation. In addition to the acts of federal legislation regulating the labor of scientific and pedagogical workers, the author analyzes the provisions of the relevant acts of social partnership for the period from 2015 untill 2023. The author highlights the problem of increasing the types of work included by the employer in the employment of the “second half of the day” of scientific and pedagogical workers without paying additional wages. The lack of legal regulation of the distribution of types of work performed by a scientific and pedagogical worker within a 36-hour working week is also noted by the author among the legal preconditions that, with appropriate law enforcement, worsen the conditions of employment of such workers due to the significantly increasing proportion of time that workers spend on achieving performance indicators and efficiency determined by the employer. In the conclusion of the paper, the author justifies amendments to the legislation in terms of regulating a fixed-term employment contract, establishing the share of guaranteed wages in the overall structure of wages, regulating the types of work included in the working hours of scientific and pedagogical workers at the level of a by-law, which cumulatively will promote sustainability of employment conditions for employees and improve their legal status.

1. Abramov RN, Gruzdev IA, Terentyev EA. Balans raboty i lichnoy zhizni i istochniki stressa nauchnopedagogicheskikh rabotnikov rossiyskikh issledovatelskikh universitetov [Work-life balance and sources of stress for the academic staff in Russian research universities]. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2019;3(151):8-26. (In Russ.)

2. Bobkov VN, Chernykh EA. Vliyanie neustoychivoy zanyatosti na perekhody molodezhi na rynke truda [The impact of precarious employment on youth transitions in the labor market]. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2014;3(193):23-55. (In Russ.)

3. Bocharnikov DA. Nekotorye problemy sistemy oplaty truda nauchnykh i pedagogicheskikh rabotnikov, otnosyashchikhsya k professorsko-prepodavatelskomu sostavu [Difficulties in the payment scheme of academic and teaching staff]. Aktualʹnye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2015;10:135-141. (In Russ.)

4. Vorobieva IV. Rossiyskie uchenye v usloviyakh prekarnoy zanyatosti [Russian Scholars under the conditions of precarious employment]. Management Issues. 2021;1(68):131-142. (In Russ.)

5. Zavgorodniy AV. Konkurs na zameshchenie professorsko-prepodavatelskikh dolzhnostey v obrazovatelnykh organizatsiyakh kak osnovanie vozniknoveniya trudovykh pravootnosheniy [Competition for the replacement of faculty positions in educational organizations as the basis for the emergence of employment relations]. Perm Legal Almanac. Annual Periodic Scientific Magazine. 2018;1:413-427. (In Russ.)

6. Kamarova TA. «Tsifrovaya prekarizatsiya» nauchno-pedagogicheskikh rabotnikov v usloviyakh sotsialnoekonomicheskoy turbulentnosti [“Digital precarization” of scientific and pedagogical workers in conditions of socio-economic turbulence]. Herald of Omsk University. Series: Economics. 2020;18(3):72-83. (In Russ.)

7. Korshunova TYu. Problemy dostoynogo truda v usloviyakh netipichnoy zanyatosti [Problems of Decent Labour in Conditions of Atypical Employment]]. Journal of Russian Law. 2020;7:78–97. (In Russ.)

8. Kuleshova AV, Podvoisky DG. Paradoksy publikatsionnoy aktivnosti v pole sovremennoy rossiyskoy nauki: genezis, diagnoz, trendy [The paradoxes of publication activity in contemporary Russian science: genesis, diagnosis, and trends]. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2018;4:169-210. (In Russ.)

9. Lobova SV. «Novaya» zanyatost «starykh» prepodavateley v usloviyakh gibridnogo obucheniya [“New” employment of “old” teachers in the context of hybrid learning]. First International Scientific Conference on Digitalization Issues: Edcrunch Ural — 2020: Conference Proceedings (Yekaterinburg, September 29–30, 2020). Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House; 2020. (In Russ.)

10. Lobova SV. Prekarizatsiya zanyatosti nauchno-pedagogicheskoy rabotnikov vuzov: soderzhanie i posledstviya [Precarious work of scientific and pedagogical workers: contents and consequences]. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie regiona: upravlenie, innovatsii, podgotovka kadrov. 2019;6:243-259. (In Russ.)

11. Lyutov NL. Srochnyy trudovoy dogovor kak instrument neustoychivoy zanyatosti: mnogokratnoe perezaklyuchenie i vozmozhnost zaklyucheniya s nauchno-pedagogicheskimi rabotnikami [A fixed-term employment agreement as a tool of unstable employment: multiple renewal and the possibility of conclusion with teachers]. Labor Law in Russia and Abroad. 2018;4:20-23. (In Russ.)

12. Lyutov NL. Transformatsiya trudovogo pravootnosheniya i novye formy zanyatosti v usloviyakh tsifrovoy ekonomiki [The transformation of employment relations and new forms of employment in the digital economy]. Journal of Russian Law. 2019;7:115-130. (In Russ.)

13. Rambly LE, Pacheko IF, Altbach FJ. Mezhdunarodnoe sopostavlenie oplaty truda prepodavateley vuzov [International comparison of the remuneration of university professors]. Economics of Education. 2010;1(56). (In Russ.)

14. Sedova NN. Pravovye osobennosti ucheta trudozatrat prepodavatelej vysshej medicinskoj shkoly [Legal features of accounting for the labor costs of teachers of higher medical school]. Medical Law. 2021;4:10-15. (In Russ.)

15. Fayman NS. Neustojchivost uslovij zanjatosti nauchno-pedagogicheskih kadrov kak faktor formirovanija akademicheskogo prekariata [Instability of terms of employment of scientific and pedagogical personnel as a factor of formation of the academic precariat]. Population. 2019;22(4):104-105. (In Russ.)

16. Khasenov MKh. Pravovoe regulirovanie dejatelnosti samozanjatogo naselenija [Legal regulation of the activities of the self-employed population]. Labor Law in Russia and Abroad. 2019;1:21-24. (In Russ.)

17. Chinchikova GB. O prekariatskom prave i vuzovskom prekariate: nauchno-instrumentalnyj, normativnopravovoj i moralno-jeticheskij kommentarij [On precariat law and university precariat: a scientific and instrumental, regulatory, moral and ethical commentary]. Court’s Administrator. 2020;4:13-18. (In Russ.)

18. Allmer T. Precarious, always-on and flexible: A case study of academics as information workers. European Journal of Communication. 2018;33(4):381-395.

19. Altbach PG. The Overuse of Rankings. The International Imperative in Higher Education. Global Perspectives on Higher Education. Rotterdam : SensePublishers; 2013.

20. Atay E, Bayraktaroglu S, Tanriverdi G. The relationship of work-life conflict and organizational voice in higher education sector: a case study in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics. 2020;25:53-74.

21. Ayudhya N, Prouska R, Beauregard TA. The Impact of Global Economic Crisis and Austerity on Quality of Working Life and Work-Life Balance: A Capabilities Perspective. European Management Abstract. 2019;16: 847-862.

22. Cabbolet MJ. The Least Interesting Unit: A New Concept for Enhancing One’s Academic Career Opportunities. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22:1837-1841.

23. Ren XN, Caudle DJ. Balancing academia and family life. The gendered strains and struggles between the UK and China compared. Gender in management. Feb. 2020.

24. Zakharova M, Przhilenskiy V. Precariat in science and research: legal and philosophic comprehension of the issue in the global challenges perspective. RUDN Journal of Law. 2020;24(4).