Application of the Principles of Contract Law to Contractual Relations complicated by a Digital Element

The paper is devoted to the application of the principles of law in contractual relations, the emergence or implementation of which are associated with the use of digital means. The development of digital technologies has caused objective changes in the structure and qualities of economic turnover. At the same time, objective changes mean those that are formed due to changes in the behavior of private entities at the micro level.

The author substantiates the thesis according to which, in conditions of a lack of regulatory regulation, the relevant principles of law are in demand sources of law for resolving potential conflicts of interest. The author states that in conditions when the main categories of civil law are being revised — subjects (identity identification), objects (tokenization), transactions (ways of expressing will in the digital economy), fulfillment of obligations (smart contracts), the main thing that law will remain unchanged is its principles. The principles of law are lawthemselves; the rest is either changing forms of relations that law affects, or a changing mechanism for the implementation of legal ideas. In turn, it is the principles of law that contain invariable methods of resolving conflicts of interest, which is the main subject of law. Complicating the contractual relationship with a digital element not only does not cancel the application of principles to such relations, but at the stage of insufficient regulatory regulation as a means of implementing the principles of law requires their active use to resolve conflicts of interest.

The paper classifies some cases of digital means application at the stage of concluding a contract, fulfilling obligations, and enforcement. The potential of the principles of law for resolving disputable situations in digital contractual relations at each stage of the development of contractual legal relations is shown.

1. Borodyanskiy VI. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Printsipy i normy: uchebnoe posobie [Civil Law. Principles and norms: A textbook]. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.).

2. Bushev AYu. Tsifrovye tsennye bumagi i zashchita prav ikh obladateley [Digital securities and protection of the rights of their holders]. Zakon [Law]. 2021;10. (In Russ.).

3. Vasilevskaya LYu, Poduzova EB, Tasalov FA. Tsifrovizatsiya grazhdanskogo oborota: problemy i tendentsii razvitiya (tsivilisticheskoe issledovanie): monografiya [Digitalization of civil turnover: problems and development trends (civil research): A monograph]. In 5 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Prospekt, 2021. (In Russ.).

4. Hegel G. Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of Law]. Transl. by Stolpner BG. Moscow: Yurayt; 2019. (In Russ.).

5. Bogdanova EE, Bogdanov DE, Vasilevskaya LYu, et al. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik [Civil law: A textbook]. In 2 vols. Moscow: Prospekt; 2020. (In Russ.).

6. Ayusheeva IZ, Bogdanova EE, Bulaevskiy BA, et al. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik [Civil law: A textbook]. In 2 vols. Moscow: Prospekt; 2020. (In Russ.).

7. Egorova MA, Belitskaya AV. Publichnoe regulirovanie kriptovalyutnykh otnosheniy v kontekste riska natsionalnoy bezopasnosti [Public regulation of cryptocurrency relations in the context of national security risk]. Yurist [Jurist]. 2021;1. (In Russ.).

8. Zhuzhzhalov MB. Statya 66.1 GK RF: vsego lish mnozhestvo nedochetov ili odna bolshaya oshibka? [Article 66.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation: Just a lot of flaws or one big mistake?]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2021;5. (In Russ.).

9. Ippolitova EV. Graficheskiy interfeys polzovatelya kak obekt intellektualnoy sobstvennosti: opyt SShA i Rossii [Graphical user interface as an object of intellectual property: the experience of the USA and Russia]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2021;10. (In Russ.).

10. Konovalov AV. Printsipy grazhdanskogo prava [Principles of civil law]. St. Petersburg: Pravo; 2019. (In Russ.).

11. Kuznetsova OA. Pryamoe (neposredstvennoe) deystvie printsipov grazhdanskogo prava [Direct (immediate) effect of the principles of civil law]. Notarius [Notary]. 2006;1. (In Russ.).

12. Matushkina A, Yankovskiy R, Orekhovich A, Kazantsev E, Lavrenkov P, Levashenko A. “Tsifra” k nam prikhodit [“Digit” arrives]. Bankovskoe obozrenie [Banking review]. 2021;1:36-39. (In Russ.).

13. Novoselova LA, Polezhaev OA. O pravovom rezhime obektov grazhdanskikh prav, vyrazhennykh v tsifrovykh aktivakh [On the legal regime of objects of civil rights expressed in digital assets]. Zakon [Law]. 2020;11:165-172. (In Russ.).

14. Marchenko MN, editor. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskiy [General theory of state and law. Academic course]. In 3 vols. Vol. 2. 2nd ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow: Zertsalo-M; 2001. (In Russ.).

15. Poduzova EB. Subekty tsifrovykh pravootnosheniy: tendentsii prava i biznesa [Participants of Digital Legal Relations: Trends in Law and Business]. Aktualʹnye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2021;2. (In Russ.).

16. Sannikova LV, Kharitonova YuS. Tsifrovye aktivy: pravovoy analiz: monografiya [Digital Assets: Legal analysis: A monograph]. Moscow: 4 Print; 2020. (In Russ.).

17. Smirnova YaV. Osobennosti soderzhaniya ponyatiya “biometricheskie dannye” v prave Evropeyskogo Soyuza [Specifics of nature of the biometric data definition in law of the European Union]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Кутафafina (MGYuA) [Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)]. 2021;(7):160-167. (In Russ.).

18. Solodilov AV. Sovremennye problemy ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya: izbrannye stati [Modern problems of economic justice: Selected articles]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2021. (In Russ.).

19. Suvorov ED. K voprosu o meste tsifrovykh tekhnologiy v ramkakh instituta ispolneniya obyazatelstv [On the question of the place of digital technologies within the framework of the Institute of fulfillment of obligations]. Zakon [Law]. 2020;8. (In Russ.).

20. Suvorov ED. Nekotorye problemy elektronnoy torgovli: k voprosu ob otvetstvennosti vladeltsev agregatorov pered potrebitelyami [Some problems of e-commerce: On the issue of the responsibility of the owners of aggregators to consumers]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2019;9. (In Russ.).