Dialectics of Changeability and Divisibility: Notes on the Criteria for the Periodization of Judicial Transformations in Russia in the Second Half of the 19th — Beginning of the 21st Centuries
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.184.3.142-159
Abstract
Social demands for justice and efficiency of justice, the reforms of the judicial sphere (constitutional norms, judicial system and judicial proceedings), as well as the rapid information development of society cause further transformations in the judicial system. Along with other social institutions courts of various jurisdictions designed to resolve disputes related to their jurisdiction on the basis of laws significantly influence legislative discretion and real law enforcement. In their entirety, the courts of the country form a single judicial system, the legal foundations, principles of organization and activity of which are fixed by law. The study of the dynamics of judicial transformations, as well as the periodization of such by dividing them into successive stages of judicial changes, seems to the authors to be an urgent scientific task. The object of research in the paper is judicial transformations in Russia in the second half of the 19th — beginning of the 21st century, which the authors divided into the corresponding periods. The subject of the research is the criteria for the periodization of judicial reforms in Russia in the second half of the 19th — beginning of the 21st century. Method and methodology: identification and development of criteria for the periodization of judicial reforms in Russia in the second half of the 19th — beginning of the 21st century are carried out by the authors on the basis of the principles of systematic, axiological, comparative legal and historical legal research, as well as historiographical and dialectical method. The novelty of the study, the main conclusions: the criteria for the periodization of judicial transformations in Russia in the second half of the 19th — beginning of the 21st century, which include normative legal, substantive, contextual environmental, temporal and axiological criteria, given by the authors, make it possible to effectively carry out this periodization. The methodology of applying the set of criteria justified in the paper to the periodization of judicial transformations has a great heuristic potential for studying other social phenomena, the study of which is included in the subject field of historical and legal sciences.
About the Authors
V. M. BolshakovaRussian Federation
Valentina M. Bolshakova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management, Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation; Lawyer, Nizhny Novgorod Regional Bar Association
603950, Nizhny Novgorod, prosp. Gagarina, d. 49
I. V. Kholikov
Russian Federation
Ivan V. Kholikov, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Chief Researcher, Department of International Law, Professor, Department of International and European Law
117218, Moscow, ul. Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya, d. 17
References
1. Begisheva NZh. K voprosu o periodizatsii perekhodnogo gosudarstva v period Fevralskoy revolyutsii 1917 goda [On the question of the periodization of the Transitional State during the February Revolution of 1917]. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Science Vector of Togliatti State University]. 2009;S2;15-18. (In Russ.)
2. Bogdanov DV. Postmodern v rossiyskom chastnom prave: vzaimodeystvie pravovoy i sudebnoy doktriny [Postmodernity in Russian Private Law: Interaction of Legal and Judicial Doctrine]. Lex russica. 2021;(11):102- 123. (In Russ.)
3. Bolshakova VM. Dinamika sudebnykh preobrazovaniy v Rossii vo vtoroy polovine XIX — nachale XXI veka: istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie [Dynamics of judicial transformations in Russia in the second half of the 19th — beginning of the 21st century: Historical and legal research]. Demicheva AA, editor. Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation. Tambov: Derzhavinskiy; 2021. (In Russ.)
4. Bolshakova VM. Genezis stanovleniya i razvitiya sudebnoy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii v kontse XX — nachale XXI veka: institutsionalnye i normativnye kharakteristiki [The genesis of the formation and development of the judicial system of the Russian Federation in the late 20 — early 21 century: Institutional and regulatory characteristics]. Pravo i politika [Law and politics]. 2021;3:26-36. (In Russ.)
5. Bolshakova VM, Naumov PYu. O nekotorykh voprosakh garmonizatsii zakonodatelstva o sudoproizvodstve i predstavitelstve: sravnitelno-pravovaya kharakteristika [On some issues of harmonization of legislation on legal proceedings and representation: Comparative legal characteristics]. Aktualnye problemy gosudarstva i prava [Current Issues of the State and Law]. 2021;5:(19):373-387. In Russ.)
6. Gracheva EYu, Vasilyeva TA. Povyshenie kachestva dissertatsionnykh issledovaniy: novye trebovaniya, novye problemy. Intervyu s predsedatelem ekspertnogo soveta VK po pravu [Improving the quality of dissertation research: New requirements, new problems. Interview with the Chairman of the Expert Council of the Higher Attestation Commission on Law]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2018;13(1):11-21. (In Russ.)
7. Gracheva EYu. Istoriya finansovogo prava [History of financial law]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Kutafina (MGYuA) [Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)]. 2015;3(7):28-45. (In Russ.)
8. Grebennikov VV, Grudtsyna LYu. Printsipy organizatsii i tipologizatsii sudebnykh sistem [Principles of organization and typologization of judicial systems]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and law]. 2018;1:102-106. (In Russ.)
9. Grebnev RD. Na puti k novoy kontseptsii sudoustroystva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [On the way to a new concept of the judicial system in the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki» [RUDN Journal of Law. Series «Legal Sciences»]. 2015;1:70-74. (In Russ.)
10. Grebnev RD. Sudebnaya vlast v strukture mekhanizma gosudarstva i v sisteme razdeleniya vlastey [Judicial power in the structure of the mechanism of the state and in the system of separation of powers]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki» [RUDN Journal of Law. Series «Legal Sciences»]. 2015;4:48-63. (In Russ.)
11. Guseynov AA. Moral i pravo: liniya razgranicheniya [Morality and law: A demarcation line]. Lex russica. 2018;8(141):7-22. (In Russ.)
12. Demichev AA, Bolshakova VM, Ilyukhina AV. Periodizatsiya istorii sudebnykh preobrazovaniy v Rossii vo vtoroy polovine XIX — XXI v. [Periodization of the history of judicial transformations in Russia in the second half of the 19th — 21st century]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava [History of State and Law]. 2021;5:34-45. (In Russ.)
13. Diev VS. Kriterii vybora alternativ: ratsionalnye modeli i realnye resheniya [Criteria for choosing alternatives: Rational models and real solutions]. Vestnik NSU. Series «Philosophy». 2012;10(1):5-12. (In Russ.)
14. Drobnitskiy OG. Mir ozhivshikh predmetov. Problema tsennosti i marksistskaya filosofiya [The world of animated objects. The problem of value and Marxist philosophy]. Moscow: Politizdat; 1967. (In Russ.)
15. Zhuykov VM. Obshchaya kontseptsiya razvitiya protsessualnogo zakonodatelstva i zakonodatelstva o sudoustroystve [The general concept of the development of procedural legislation and legislation on the judicial system]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2010;7(163):5-17. (In Russ.)
16. Zhuykov VM. O nekotorykh problemakh razvitiya protsessualnogo zakonodatelstva i zakonodatelstva o sudoustroystve [On some problems of the development of procedural legislation and legislation on the judicial system]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2017;8(248):135-150. (In Russ.)
17. Zhuykov VM. Tak nazyvaemaya «optimizatsiya» — eto put v nikuda [The so-called «optimization» is the way to nowhere]. Zakon [Law]. 2018;1:6-17. (In Russ.)
18. Zinchenko VP. Tsennosti v strukture soznaniya [Values in the structure of consciousness]. Voprosy filosofii. 2011;8:85-97. (In Russ.)
19. Isaev IA. Sudebnaya reforma 1864 g.: tseli i protivorechiya [Judicial reform of 1864: Goals and contradictions]. Scientific works. Russian Academy of Legal Sciences. Moscow: Yurist, 2015. (In Russ.)
20. Isaev IA. Metafory Zakona: ot «sveta» k «plameni» [Metaphors of the Law: from «the Light» to «the Flame»]. Lex russica. 2021;74(6):23-35. (In Russ.)
21. Kagan MS. Perspektivy razvitiya gumanitarnogo znaniya v XXI veke [Prospects for the development of humanitarian knowledge in the 21st century]. Lichnost. Kultura. Obshchestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. 2005;7(4):60-69. (In Russ.)
22. Kagan MS. Sistemnost i tselostnost [Consistency and integrity]. Khudozhestvennoe obrazovanie i nauka [Art education and science]. 2017;3:8-11. (In Russ.)
23. Kleandrov MI. O problemnykh novovvedeniyakh 2020 goda v Konstitutsiyu RF v sfere mekhanizma pravosudiya [On the problematic innovations of 2020 in the Constitution of the Russian Federation in the field of the mechanism of justice]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo [Constitutional and Municipal Law]. 2021;1:7-11. (In Russ.)
24. Kleandrov MI. O napravleniyakh sovershenstvovaniya mekhanizma sudebnoy vlasti v obespechenii spravedlivosti pravosudiya [On the directions of improving the mechanism of judicial power in ensuring the fairness of justice]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and law]. 2021;3:7-23. (In Russ.)
25. Kodan SV. Sovremennye metodologicheskie podkhody v issledovatelskikh strategiyakh izucheniya istoriografii istorii politicheskikh i pravovykh ucheniy [Modern methodological approaches in research strategies for studying historiography of the history of political and legal doctrines]. Istoriko-pravovye problemy: novyy rakurs [Historical-Legal Problems: The New Viewpoint]. 2020;4:155-181. (In Russ.)
26. Kolokolov NA. Pravosudie epokhi postmoderna [Postmodern justice]. Mirovoy sudya [Magistrate Judge]. 2019;10:3-13. (In Russ.)
27. Kolokolov NA. Protsessualnaya revolyutsiya: predposylki, osushchestvlenie, posledstviya [Procedural revolution: Prerequisites, implementation, consequences]. Sovremennoe pravo Rossii: problemy i perspektivy : materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Moskva, 5 dekabrya 2019 goda [Modern Law of Russia: Problems and Prospects : Proceedings of the 4 International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, December 5, 2019]. Moscow: Institut mirovykh tsivilizatsiy; 2020. (In Russ.)
28. Kornev AV. Ideologiya, tsennosti i ikh konstitutsionnoe zakreplenie [Ideology, values and their constitutional consolidation]. In: Novelly Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zadachi yuridicheskoy nauki: materialy konferentsiy v ramkakh X Moskovskoy yuridicheskoy nedeli, Moskva, 24–27 noyabrya 2020 g.: v 5 ch. [Novelties of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the tasks of legal science: Proceedings of conferences within the framework of the 10 Moscow Legal Week, Moscow, November 24-27, 2020. In 5 vols.]. Moscow: RG-Press; 2021. P. 8-13. (In Russ.)
29. Kornev AV. Pereotsenka tsennostey v tsifrovuyu epokhu [Revaluation of values in the digital age]. In: Artemov VM, Rybakov OYu, editors. Nauchno-tekhnologicheskie transformatsii v sovremennom obshchestve: nravstvenno-filosofskoe osmyslenie i osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya: sbornik nauchnykh trudov, Moskva, 1–2 marta 2019 g. [Scientific and technological transformations in modern society: Moral and philosophical understanding and features of legal regulation. Collection of scientific papers, Moscow, March 1-2, 2019]. Moscow: RG-Press; 2019. P. 132-142. (In Russ.)
30. Kornev AV. Pravovoy nigilizm: otrazhenie ego sushchnosti, soderzhaniya i form v literature i yuridicheskoy nauke [Legal Nihilism: Its Essence, Content and Forms in Literature and Legal Science]. Lex russica. 2018;(1):9-24. (In Russ.)
31. Krakovskiy KP. Sudebnaya kontrreforma, «sudebnaya kontrreforma» ili tak nazyvaemaya sudebnaya kontrreforma [Judicial counter-reform, «judicial counter-reform» or the so-called judicial counter-reform]. Istoriko-pravovye problemy: novyy rakurs [Historical-Legal Problems: The New Viewpoint]. 2018;2:139-170. (In Russ.)
32. Latysheva NA. Popravki 2020 goda v Konstitutsiyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii i soderzhanie sudebnogo deloproizvodstva [2020 Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the content of court proceedings]. Rossiyskoe pravosudie [Russian justice]. 2021;9:5-12. (In Russ.)
33. Lomov BF, Kerimov DA. Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychology and law]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and law].1992;12:10-21. (In Russ.)
34. Matskevich IM, Vlasenko NA. Formalizatsiya spetsialnostey nauchnykh issledovaniy v sfere prava: soderzhanie i perspektivy [Formalization of specialties of scientific research in the field of law: Content and prospects]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2013;6(198):116-147. (In Russ.)
35. Momotov VV. Predlagaemaya reforma prodiktovana samoy zhiznyu [The proposed reform is dictated by life itself]. Sudya [Judge]. 2017;8(80):4-7. (In Russ.)
36. Momotov VV. Rol sudebnoy praktiki v pravovoy sisteme: rossiyskiy opyt v mirovom kontekste [The role of judicial practice in the legal system: Russian experience in the global context]. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya [Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law]. 2017;5(66):40-49. (In Russ.)
37. Momotov VV. Sudebnaya reforma 2018 goda v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kontseptsiya, tseli, soderzhanie (ch. I) [Judicial reform of 2018 in the Russian Federation: Concept, goals, content (part I)]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2018;10(262):134-146. (In Russ.)
38. Momotov VV. Sudebnaya reforma 2018 goda v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kontseptsiya, tseli, soderzhanie (ch. II) [Judicial reform of 2018 in the Russian Federation: Concept, goals, content (part II)]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2019;12:68-89. (In Russ.)
39. Momotov VV. Rossiyskoe pravosudie na sovremennom etape: osnovnye tendentsii razvitiya Russian justice at the present stage: The main development trends]. Sudya [Judge]. 2018;8(92):41-51. (In Russ.)
40. Nemytina MV. § 4. Sudebnaya reforma 1864 g. na sotsiokulturnom prostranstve Rossiyskoy imperii [Judicial reform of 1864 in the socio-cultural space of the Russian Empire]. In: Sudebnaya pravovaya politika v Rossii i zarubezhnykh stranakh: kol. monografiya [Judicial legal policy in Russia and foreign countries. A Monograph]. St. Petersburg: Tsentr nauchno-informatsionnykh tekhnologiy «sterion»; 2019. P. 176-187. (In Russ.)
41. Otchesky TI, Mishakova NV, Goloshchapova TI. Chestnost kak bazisnaya sostavlyayushchaya professionalnogo profilya sudi [Honesty as a basic component of a judge’s professional profile]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. 2021;463:240-250. (In Russ.)
42. Rudkovskaya IE. Khronologiya i periodizatsiya v istoriograficheskoy traditsii pozdnego Prosveshcheniya [Chronology and Periodization in the Historiographical Tradition of the Late Enlightenment]. Dialog so vremenem [Dialogue with time]. 2016;56:126-150. (In Russ.)
43. Savenkov AN. Filosofiya prava i yuridicheskoe myshlenie: istoriya i sovremennost [Philosophy of Law and Legal Thinking: History and Modernity]. Voprosy filosofii. 2019;8:38-48. (In Russ.)
44. Sinyukov VN. Zakonodatelstvo v Rossii: problemy sotsialnoy integratsii [Legislation in Russia: Challenges of social integration]. Lex russica. 2018;10(143):18-29. (In Russ.)
45. Sinyukov VN. Pravo XX i XXI vekov: preemstvennost i novizna [Law of the 20th and 21st Centuries: Continuity and Novelty]. Lex russica. 2021;74(2):9-20. (In Russ.)
46. Stepin VS. O metodologicheskikh podkhodakh k analizu sotsialnogo poznaniya [Methodological approaches to the analysis of social cognition]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya [MSU Vestnik. Series 7: Philosophy]. 2014;3:3-10. (In Russ.)
47. Tuganov YuN, AulovVK. Genezis arbitrazha i problemy periodizatsii: 1924–1931 gg. [Genesis of arbitration and problems of periodization: 1924-1931]. Voennoe pravo [Military law]. 2020;3(61):161-172. (In Russ.)
48. Khabrieva TYa. Konstitutsionnaya reforma v Rossii v koordinatakh universalnogo i natsionalnogo [Constitutional reform in Russia in the coordinates of universal and national]. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya [Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law]. 2021;17(1):6-12. (In Russ.)
49. Tsaliev AM. O sudebnoy vlasti v Rossii (v svete konstitutsionnykh novell) [About the judicial power in Russia (In the light of constitutional novelties)]. Rossiyskiy sudya [Russian Judge]. 2021;4:35-40. (In Russ.)
50. Chernov AV, Blokhin VV. Periodizatsiya pravleniya Aleksandra I v sovetskoy istoriografii [Periodization of the Reign of Alexander I in Soviet Historiography]. Nauchnyy dialog [Scientific dialogue]. 2020;12:378-393. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Bolshakova V.M., Kholikov I.V. Dialectics of Changeability and Divisibility: Notes on the Criteria for the Periodization of Judicial Transformations in Russia in the Second Half of the 19th — Beginning of the 21st Centuries. Lex Russica. 2022;75(3):142-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.184.3.142-159