Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Competition between Family Law Contracts and Mediation Agreements Aimed at Regulating Family Law Disputes

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.185.4.050-062

Abstract

The paper attempts to resolve the issues that arose in connection with the introduction in 2019 of amendments to the Federal Law «On Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure with the Participation of a Mediator (Mediation Procedure)" in terms of endowing a notarized mediation agreement with the force of an execution order: whether this agreement is capable of replacing a marriage contract, an agreement on the division of common property of spouses, an agreement on the payment of alimony, i.e. agreements subject to mandatory notarization. Also, the paper dwells on whether mediation agreements achieved in a dispute concerning the child’s place of residence and determining the order of communication of the child with a separate parent without transferring this dispute to the court after their notarization acquire the force of an execution order.

According to the author, not every agreement adopted as part of the out-of-court mediation procedure can be attributed to mediation agreements subject to notary certification and having the force of an enforcement document. A marriage contract and an agreement on the division of common property of spouses concluded as a result of the outof-court mediation procedure, as well as an agreement on determining the place of residence of the child generating the personal non-property right of the parent, cannot constitute the content of a mediation agreement. A child support obligation cannot arise and cannot be enforced on the basis of a mediation agreement due to special rules concerning a single contractual basis for the emergence of a child support obligation (a child support agreement). A mediation agreement may not include conditions defining the procedure for exercising the rights of a parent living separately from a child protected by the power of enforcement.

About the Author

S. Yu. Chashkova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University; S. S. Alekseev Research Center for Private Law under the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Svetlana Yu. Chashkova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Notary, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL); Leading Researcher, S. S. Alekseev Research Center for Private Law under the President of the Russian Federation

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, Russia, 125993



References

1. Antokolskaya MV. Semeynoe pravo: uchebnik [Family Law: Textbook]. Moscow; 1996. (In Russ.).

2. Bespalov YuF. Semeyno-pravovoe polozhenie rebenka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The family and legal status of the child in the Russian Federation]. Vladimir; 2000. (In Russ.).

3. Bogdanova GV. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya lichnykh i imushchestvennykh otnosheniy mezhdu roditelyami i detmi: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Problems of legal regulation of personal and property relations between parents and children: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Saratov; 1999. (In Russ.).

4. Ivanova EA. Noveyshee regulirovanie instituta mediativnogo soglasheniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: notarialnoe utverzhdenie [The Newest Regulation of the Mediation Agreement Institution in the Russian Federation: Notarial Certification]. Notary. 2020;1:6-9. (In Russ.).

5. Ilyushina MN. Aktualnye voprosy notarialnogo soprovozhdeniya mediativnogo soglasheniya [Relevant Issues of the Notarial Support of a Mediation Agreement]. Civil Law. 2020;3:34-38. (In Russ.).

6. Ksenofontova DS. Iskovaya davnost v semeynom prave [Limitation period in family law]. Family and Housing Law. 2017;3:4-8. (In Russ.).

7. Kosova OYu. Obyazannost soderzhaniya i alimentnye obyazatelstva [Maintenance obligation and alimony obligations]. Pravovedenie. 2003;4. (In Russ.).

8. Minkina NI. Mediatsiya v sisteme zashchity semi kak konstitutsionnoy tsennosti [Mediation in the System of Family Protection as a Constitutional Value]. Sovremennoe pravo. 2019;5:59-66. (In Russ.).

9. Pavin DV. Ponyatie i soderzhanie ispolnitelnogo dokumenta: problemy teorii i praktiki [The concept and content of the executive document: problems of theory and practice]. Executory Law. 2012;4:28-35. (In Russ.).

10. Chashkova SYu. Sistema dogovornykh obyazatelstv v rossiyskom semeynom prave. : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The system of contractual obligations in Russian family law: Author’s Abstract]. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.).

11. Chefranova EA. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya suprugov: nauch.-prakt. posobie [Property relations of spouses: scientific and practical. manual]. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.).

12. Chefranova EA, Chashkova SYu . Primenenie semeynogo zakonodatelstva v notarialnoy praktike: uchebnoe posobie [Application of family legislation in notary practice: textbook]. Moscow: RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia; 2012. (In Russ.).

13. Sheremetova GS. Mediativnoe soglashenie kak ispolnitelnyy dokument [Mediation Agreement as an Executive Document]. Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. 2020;2:23-27. (In Russ.).

14. Yarkov VV. Ispolnitelnye dokumenty [Executive documents]. In: Reshetnikov IV, editor. Manual on Enforcement Proceedings for Bailiffs: Textbook]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2000. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Chashkova S.Yu. Competition between Family Law Contracts and Mediation Agreements Aimed at Regulating Family Law Disputes. Lex Russica. 2022;75(4):50-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.185.4.050-062

Views: 393


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)