Conceptual Provisions of the Constitutional and Legal Definition “Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.185.4.063-075
Abstract
The 2020 constitutional reform resulted in introduction of the “Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation” definition into the Constitution of the Russian Federation. It contains conceptual provisions that, according to the author, contribute to the expansion of knowledge about the public law institute named “prosecutor’s office”.
Defining the ‘prosecutor’s office’ of the Russian Federation through the closest genus “system of bodies” allows us to distinguish between the concepts “Prosecutor’s office as a single federal centralized system of bodies” and “Prosecutor’s office system as a single federal centralized system of prosecutor’s offices and organizations”. This makes it possible to exclude the conflict of norms of Part 1, Article 129 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and paragraph 1 of Article 11 of the Federal Law “On the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation”. The substantive difference between the prosecutor’s office as a system and the prosecutor’s office system is due to their different elemental composition and structure; it also manifests itself in the sources (forms) of regulatory regulation. Federal law determines the procedure for the activities of the prosecutor’s office. Regulatory acts of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation regulate the issues of organizing the activities of the prosecutor’s office system.
The constitutional and legal function of prosecutorial supervision, by virtue of the direct effect of the Basic Law, can be carried out in almost any sphere of legal relations, regardless of the legal status of their parties. As for legislative expansion of the legal subjects supervised by the prosecutor’s office, it is proposed to focus on the conceptual model of prosecutorial assistance, in which the prosecutor primarily embodies the source of legality, providing everyone with the opportunity to carry out their activities in line with the law on the basis of objective and reasoned information, including in the form of an act of prosecutorial response.
The function of criminal prosecution is implemented by the prosecutor’s office both in the judicial stages of criminal proceedings and in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case, within which it is separated from the function of public prosecutor’s supervision.
The constitutional and legal novel on the prosecutor’s office’s own powers requires their specification in the federal law and harmonization with the powers of the prosecutor’s office of the Russian Federation and prosecutors.
Keywords
About the Author
V. K. ArtemenkovRussian Federation
Vladimir K. Artemenkov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Senior Prosecutor of the Legal Department,
ul. B. Dmitrovka, d. 15a, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Buyanskiy SG. Prokuratura v usloviyakh administrativno-pravovoy reformy: monografiya [Prosecutor’s Office in the context of administrative and legal reform. A monograph]. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
2. Vinokurov AYu. O novellakh v Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii, zatragivayushchikh status prokuratury. Izbrannye stati: v 3 t. [On novelties in the Constitution of the Russian Federation affecting the status of the Prosecutor’s Office. Selected articles: in 3 vols.]. Vol. 3. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
3. Dikarev IS. Sistema sderzhek i protivovesov v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam [The system of checks and balances in pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2018;3:76-83. (In Russ.).
4. Elkina OS. O sistemnoy terminologii [About system terminology]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika» [Herald of Omsk University. Series: «Economics»]. 2010;1:53-60. (In Russ.).
5. Ergashev ER. Prokurorskoe nadzorno-okhranitelnoe pravo kak sostavlyayushchaya edinoy sistemy otechestvennogo prava [Prosecutor’s supervisory and protective law as a component of the unified system of domestic law]. Tamozhennoe delo [Customs Affairs]. 2007;2;35-43. (In Russ.).
6. Ergashev ER. K voprosu o ponyatii i priznakakh predmeta i obekta prokurorskogo nadzora za soblyudeniem prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina [On the question of the concept and subject and object features of the prosecutorial supervision over the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2011;11:16-21. (In Russ.).
7. Karpov N. Khoroshaya teoriya — zalog uspeshnoy praktiki [A good theory is the key to successful practice]. Zakonnost. 2008;7:12-15. (In Russ.).
8. Korkunov NM. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava [Lectures on the general theory of law]. 8th ed. St. Petersburg; 1909. (In Russ.).
9. Lenin VI. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy [The complete works]. Vol. 45. 5th ed. Moscow; 1970. (In Russ.).
10. Muravev NV. Prokurorskiy nadzor v ego ustroystve i deyatelnosti [Public prosecutor’s supervision in its structure and activities]. Vol. 1. Moscow; 1889. (In Russ.).
11. Marchenko MN, editor. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskiy kurs: v 3 t. T. 2. Pravo [General theory of state and law. Academic course. In 3 vols. Vol. 2: Law]. 4th ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow; 2013. (In Russ.).
12. Prokhorenko VK. Metodologicheskie printsipy obshchey dinamiki sistem [Methodological principles of the general dynamics of systems]. Minsk; 1969. (In Russ.).
13. Mankov AG, ed. Zakonodatelstvo perioda stanovleniya absolyutizma. T. 4 [Legislation of the period of absolutism formation. Vol. 4]. In: Chistyakov OI, ed. Rossiyskoe zakonodatelstvo X–XX vekov: v 9 t. [Russian legislation of the 10th — 20th centuries. In 9 vols.]. Moscow; 1986. (In Russ.).
14. Sviderskiy VI, Zobov RA. Novye filosofskie aspekty elementno-strukturnykh otnosheniy [New philosophical aspects of element-structural relations]. Leningrad; 1970. (In Russ.).
15. Smirnov AF. K voprosu o vlasti prokurora [To the question of the power of the prosecutor]. Aktualʹnye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2015;5:133-137. (In Russ.).
16. Emelyanov BM, Pravkin SA. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: kurs lektsiy [Theory of state and law: A course of lectures]. Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.).
17. Volkova VN, Emelyanov AA, eds. Teoriya sistem i sistemnyy analiz v upravlenii organizatsiyami: spravochnik: ucheb. posobie [Theory of systems and system analysis in the management of organizations: reference book. A study book]. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
18. Ilyichev LF, ed. Filosofskiy slovar [Philosophical Dictionary]. 4th ed. Moscow; 1980. (In Russ.).
19. Shobukhin VYu. Konstitutsionnoe regulirovanie statusa prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy, tendentsii i perspektivy izmeneniya st. 129 Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsi [Constitutional regulation of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation status: Problems, trends and prospects of amendments to Article 129 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie [State Power and Local Self-Government]. 2020;4:26-29. (In Russ.).
20. Erdelevskiy AM. O nekotorykh voprosakh pravovogo statusa prokuratury [On some issues of the Prosecutor’s Office legal status]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2014;6:83-85. (In Russ.).
21. Yastrebov VB. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik [Public Prosecutor’s Supervision. A textbook]. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Artemenkov V.K. Conceptual Provisions of the Constitutional and Legal Definition “Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. Lex Russica. 2022;75(4):63-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.185.4.063-075