Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Machine Reading of Law and Spatial Constructions in Painting: Search for the Methodology of Machine Perception of Law

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.190.9.066-078

Abstract

Introduction of information technology (IT) in the legal sphere, in particular, providing the functions of machine reading and machine execution of law, requires not only rethinking of such phenomena as law and a statute at the philosophical level, but also obtaining applied results that make it possible to implement theoretical developments in a digital form. All this entails the need to develop a methodology for the perception of law that is adequate for solving the problems of digital transformation. The author provides the definitions of the concepts of «machine reading of law» and «machine execution of law» and gives a number of comments on them. In order to develop a methodology that provides approaches to solving the problems of machine reading and machine law, based on the research of academician B.V. Rauschenbach on spatial constructions in painting the author refers to the practices of describing the reality by the masters of ancient and medieval painting and to the peculiarities of their use of artistic techniques. Some techniques are given in the paper. The author comes to the conclusion that when developing the methodology of machine reading of law and constructing theoretical and utilitarian models of machine perception of law, one should not only rely on the mechanisms of rational cognition of legal reality, but also, like the ancient masters, strive to perceive and transmit information about an object simultaneously on rational (conceptual) and irrational (intuitive, sensual) the law itself, as a multidimensional phenomenon, must be considered in several dimensions. In the context of the processes of digital transformation, legal scholars should go to the formulation of the problem of legal perception and its systematic study, taking into account the factor of the multidimensionality of legal reality and the law itself, moreover, exploring the problem on an interdisciplinary basis and not deliberately seeking to be limited to the framework of any one specific theory of legal understanding.

About the Author

S. N. Gavrilov
Center for the Implementation and Operation of the Integrated Information System, Russian Bar, Federal Chamber of Lawyers of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Sergey N. Gavrilov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Cand. Sci. (History), Associate Professor, Head

per. Sivtsev Vrazhek, d. 43, Moscow, 119002



References

1. Begishev IR, Hisamova ZI. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i robototekhnika: glossariy ponyatiy [Artificial intelligence and robotics: a glossary of concepts]. Moscow; 2021. (In Russ.).

2. Berdyaev NA. Smysl tvorchestva [The meaning of creativity]. Paris; 1985. (In Russ.).

3. Vedeneev YuA. Pravovaya realnost: ontologiya i epistemiologiya [Legal reality: Ontology and epistemology]. Lex russica. 2015;5. (In Russ.).

4. Hegel GF. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk: v 3 t. T. 1: Nauka logiki [Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences: in 3 vols. Vol. 1: The Science of Logic]. Moscow; 1974. (In Russ.).

5. Zakhartsev SI, Salnikov VP. Komprekhendnaya teoriya poznaniya prava [Theory of comprehend learns the law]. Monitoring Pravoprimeneniya. 2019;4(33):4-13. (In Russ.).

6. Zakhartsev SI, Salnikov VP. Chto est komprekhendnaya teoriya prava? [What is a comprehensive theory of law?]. Legal Science. 2016;3:5-9. (In Russ.).

7. Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6 t. [Essays: in 6 vols. Vol. 4. Part 1. Moscow; 1963. (In Russ.).

8. Kolesov VV. Drevnyaya Rus: nasledie v slove: v 5 kn. Kn. 4: Mudrost slova [Ancient Rus: heritage in the word: in 5 books. Book 4: The Wisdom of the Word]. St. Petersburg: Faculty of Philology, St. Petersburg State University Publ.; 2011. (In Russ.).

9. Kolesov VV. Russkaya mentalnost v yazyke i tekste [Russian mentality in language and text].St. Petersburg; 2007. (In Russ.).

10. Kolesov V. V. Osnovy kontseptologii [Fundamentals of conceptology]. St. Petersburg; 2019. (In Russ.).

11. Kuznetsova EA. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v epokhu postmoderna: avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk [Information technologies in the postmodern era: Cand. Sci. (Philosophy)]. St. Petersburg; 2005. (In Russ.).

12. Lazarev VV. Integrativnoe vospriyatie prava [Integrative perception of law]. In: Lazarev VV. Selected works of the last decade. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).

13. Rauschenbach BV. O logike triedinosti [On the logic of the triune]. Voprosy filosofii. 1990;11:166-169. (In Russ.).

14. Rauschenbach BV. Prostranstvennye postroeniya v zhivopisi: Ocherk osnovnykh metodov [Spatial constructions in painting: An outline of the main methods]. Moscow; 1980. (In Russ.).

15. Rozanov VV. Poslednie listya [The last leaves]. Moscow; 2000. (In Russ.).

16. Sidorenko AI, Ibragimova YuE. Integrativnoe ponimanie prava [Integrative understanding of law]. Journal of Russian Law. 2017;7:33-45. (In Russ.).

17. Spirin MYu. Glossary. Available at: https://urlife.pro/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/otp_glossary.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2022).

18. Cherdantsev AF. Integrativnoe nedoponimanie prava [Integrative misunderstanding of law]. Journal of Russian Law. 2016;10:5-15. (In Russ.).

19. Benvinist E. General Linguistics. Available at: https://classes.ru/grammar/167.Benvenist-common-linguistics/source/worddocuments/v.htm (Accessed: 17.04.2022).

20. Kolesov VV, Pimenova MV. Yazykovye osnovy russkoy mentalnosti [Linguistic foundations of the Russian mentality: studies. manual]. 5th ed. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Gavrilov S.N. Machine Reading of Law and Spatial Constructions in Painting: Search for the Methodology of Machine Perception of Law. Lex Russica. 2022;75(9):66-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.190.9.066-078

Views: 286


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)