Competition between Methodological Approaches in the History of Political and Legal Doctrines

The paper is devoted to various approaches to the study of political and legal doctrines. Each of them in its structure contains a methodological basis. It is the methodology of political and legal ideas that largely determines their scientific validity and practical feasibility. In this regard, methodological techniques are of great importance. The peculiarity of the history of political and legal doctrines as a scientific and educational discipline is that it not only uses certain methods of scientific cognition, like any other science, but also has a powerful methodological potential itself. Currently, we are witnessing an uncompromising war of ideologies having certain values and interests behind them. In this context, the paper reveals methodological approaches used in the cognition of the political and legal reality reflected in the ideas of thinkers of past eras and modernity. The paper does not consider general, particular and special methods of cognition. The emphasis is given to certain cognitive approaches and actions in order to analyze the content of political and legal doctrines. In this regard, the author attempts to consider history, for example, not as a science, but as a scientific method. The same applies to philosophy and sociology. This is somewhat at odds with certain «standards» regarding methodology as a set of methods and techniques for obtaining scientific knowledge. Nevertheless, in relation to the history of political and legal doctrines, such an approach is justified by virtue of the object and subject of the study. Competition between these approaches means only freedom of choice of research techniques and their ability to complement each other.

1. Baudrillard J. Simulyakry i simulyatsii [Simulacra and simulations]. Moscow: Postum Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.).

2. Danilevskiy NYa. Rossiya i Evropa [Russia and Europe]. Moscow: Kniga Publ.; 1991. (In Russ.).

3. Durkheim E. Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie [Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose]. Moscow: Terra-Knizhniy klub Publ.; 2008. (In Russ.).

4. Zhukov VN. Filosofiya prava: [Philosophy of Law]. Moscow: Mir filosofii, Algoritm Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).

5. Zenkovskiy VV. Istoriya russkoy filosofii: v 2 t. [History of Russian Philosophy. In 2 vols.]. Vol. 1. Part 1. Leningrad: Ego Publ.; 1991. (In Russ.).

6. Kareev NI. Vvedenie v izuchenie sotsiologii [Introduction to the study of sociology]. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2008. (In Russ.).

7. Kerimov DA. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v 3 t. [Selected works: In 3 vols.]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Academiya Publ.; 2007. (In Russ.).

8. Mechnikov L. Tsivilizatsiya i velikie istoricheskie reki [Civilization and the great historical rivers]. Moscow: Ayris-Press Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.).

9. Pozner R. Rubezhi teorii prava [Frontiers of the theory of law]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2017. (In Russ.).

10. Stepin VS. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki [History and philosophy of science]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.).

11. Syrykh VM. Metod pravovoy nauki. Osnovnye elementy, struktura [Method of legal science. (In Russ.). Basic elements, structure]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ.; 1980. (In Russ.).

12. Tille AA, Shvekov GV. Sravnitelnyy metod v yuridicheskikh distsiplinakh [Comparative method in legal disciplines]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ.; 1978. (In Russ.).

13. Frolova EA. Metodologiya i filosofiya prava. Ot Dekarta do russkikh neokantiantsev [Methodology and philosophy of law. From Descartes to Russian neo-Kantians]. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).