Age as a Legal Fact in the Family Sphere: Temptations and Conventionality of the Number of Years
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.191.10.017-032
Abstract
The paper examines the meanings of an age as an independent legal fact or an element of a complex legal and factual structure in the family legal sphere. The author states that the legal significance of a person’s age is diverse and ambiguous. At the same time, legislative decisions are based on various factors: conventions of the digital designation of the age report point, respect for national and cultural traditions, including legal ones, considerations about medical and psychological characteristics more or less corresponding to a particular age, subjective preferences or mistakes, purely political (ideological) motives. As a result, the combination of these factors leads to justified or, to varying degrees, unjustified approaches that are extremely approximate in digital terms. The paper criticizes family law provisions concerning regional diversity and regulating the issue of reducing the age of marriage, which does not always reflect the real national and cultural characteristics of the territories and excessively localizes the concept of legal capacity. The author analyzes the differentiation of the child’s age capabilities as a subject of family law, including the context of interaction with relevant decisions in other branches of Russian law (constitutional, municipal, administrative, civil, labor, civil procedure). The absence of a system in this matter is stated. It is proposed to adjust the legislation in terms of systematization of «launch points» of partial legal capacity of minors. The author emphasizes a psychological context of the problem of a legal age for the child. The paper demonstartes other values of age for the family law sphere, namely: invalidity of marriage, alimony obligations, custody and guardianship, adoption (adoption).
Keywords
About the Author
N. N. TarusinaRussian Federation
Nadezhda N. Tarusina, Cand. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation
Department of Social and Family Legislation
150003
ul. Sovetskaya, d. 14
Yaroslavl
References
1. Antokolskaya M. V. Semeynoe pravo [Family law]. Moscow: Yurist Publ.; 1997. (In Russ.).
2. Besedkina N. I. Prava nerodivshegosya rebenka [Rights of an Unborn Child]. State and Law. 2006; 4: 54-60. (In Russ.).
3. Bespalov Yu. F. Semeyno-pravovoy status rebenka: problemy semeynogo zakonodatelstva RF [Family Legal Status of the Child: Problems of the Family Legislation of the Russian Federation]. Family and Housing Law. 2016; 5: 11-15. (In Russ.).
4. Bozhovich L. I. Lichnost i uchenie podrostka [Personality and the teaching of a teenager]. Psychological Science and Education. 1997; 2 (1): 5-10. (In Russ.).
5. Vorozheikin E. M. Semeynye pravootnosheniya v SSSR [Family legal relations in the USSR]. Moscow: Yurid. lit-ra Publ.; 1972. (In Russ.).
6. Vygotsky L. S. Problema vozrasta [The problem of age]. Collected works: in 6 vols. Vol. 4. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ.; 1984. (In Russ.).
7. Sergeev A. P. (ed.). Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law]. Vol. 3. Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.).
8. Dubrovina I. A. L. S. Vygotskiy i sovremennaya prakticheskaya psikhologiya (k 120-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya L. S. Vygotskogo) [L. S. Vygotsky and modern practical psychology (to the 120th anniversary of the birth of L. S. Vygotsky)]. Bulletin of Psychological Ptactice in Education. 2016; 2 (47): 3-9. (In Russ.).
9. Duvernois N. L. Chteniya po grazhdanskomu pravu [Readings on civil law]. Moscow: Zertsalo Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).
10. Zykov S. V. Uchet mneniya rebenka po sporam mezhdu roditelyami o meste ego zhitelstva [Taking the Child’s Opinion into Account in Disputes between the Parents over the Child’s Place of Residence]. Family and Housing Law. 2022; 4: 13-16. (In Russ.).
11. Ioffe O. S. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Soviet civil law]. Vol. 3. Moscow; 1965. (In Russ.).
12. Klyueva N. V., Sizova A. V., Pashkina O. S. Kommunikativnye navyki mladshikh podrostkov, igrayushchikh v videoigry [Communication skills of younger teenagers playing video games]. Yaroslavl Psychological Journal. 2022; 1 (52): 103-106. (In Russ.).
13. Kraig G, Bokum D. Psikhologiya razvitiya [Psychology of development]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ.; 2005. (In Russ.).
14. Ksenofontova D. S. Pravovye garantii v sfere alimentirovaniya [Legal guarantees in the field of alimony]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).
15. Kurylenko O. G. Regulirovanie brachnogo pravootnosheniya po zakonodatelstvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Regulation of marital relations under the legislation of the Russian Federation: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow; 2003. (In Russ.).
16. Lekanova E. E. K voprosu o zashchite interesov nesovershennoletnikh pri vstuplenii v brak [On the issue of protecting the interests of minors at the time of marriage]. Sotsialno-yuridicheskaya tetrad. 2018; 8: 68-79. (In Russ.).
17. Lushnikov A. M., Lushnikova M. V. Trudovoe pravo [Labor Law]. Moscow: Prospect Publ.; 2021. (In Russ.).
18. Matveeva N. A. Institut obyazannostey rebenka v zakonodatelstve zarubezhnykh stran [The institution of child`s obligations in laws of foreign countries]. Family and Housing Law. 2020; 6: 25-28. (In Russ.).
19. Matveeva N. A. Problemy vstupleniya v brak do dostizheniya brachnogo vozrasta v subektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Issues of Consummation of Marriage before Reaching the Marriageable Age in Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation]. Family and Housing Law. 2018; 2: 11-14. (In Russ.).
20. Matveeva N. A. Ustanovlenie vozrastnykh trebovaniy dlya pretendentov na status usynoviteley, opekunov i popechiteley nesovershennoletnikh podopechnykh, priemnykh roditeley [The establishment of age requirements for applicants for the status of adoptive parents, guardians and trustees of minor wards, foster parents]. Family and Housing Law. 2021; 6: 12-14. (In Russ.).
21. Meyer D. I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Russian Civil Law]. Part 1. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 1997. (In Russ.).
22. Nechaeva A. M. Semeynoe pravo [Family Law]. Moscow: Yurayt Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.).
23. Mukhina V. S. Vozrastnaya psikhologiya [Age Psychology]. Moscow: Academiya Publ.; 1997. (In Russ.).
24. Salenko A. A. Svoboda mirnykh sobraniy: «detskie mitingi» i «vzroslye sanktsii» [Freedom of peaceful assembly: «children’s meetings» and «adult sanctions»]. Journal of Russian Law. 2019; 8: 48-61. (In Russ.).
25. Sitkova O. Yu. Pravovaya priroda prava rebenka na dostup k informatsii i ego ogranichenie v tselyakh zashchity rebenka ot informatsii, nanosyashchey vred psikhicheskomu zdorovyu i razvitiyu [The legal nature of the child’s right to access information and the restriction thereof to protect a child against information detrimental to the mental health and development of minors]. Family and Housing Law. 2021; 1: 27-30. (In Russ.).
26. Smirnov S. A. Chelovek i tsifra: istoriya soblazna [Human and digit: the story of temptation]. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2021; 8: 22-29 (In Russ.).
27. Tarusina N. N. Gender v zakone i semeynye tsennosti: v poiskakh balansa [Gender in law and family values: in search of a balance]. Lex russica. 2022; 75 (1): 131-146. (In Russ.).
28. Tarusina N. N., Sochneva O. I. O fiktivnosti v semeyno-pravovoy sfere [About fictitious acts in the field of family law]. Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2015; 6: 78-84. (In Russ.).
29. Tarusina N. N. Neskolko tezisov o prave roditsya [Several theses on the right to be born]. Lex russica. 2021; 74 (174): 52-62. (In Russ.).
30. Tarusina N. N. O nekotorykh neveroyatnykh priklyucheniyakh «neulovimoy» konstruktsii obyazannosti [About some incredible adventures of the «elusive» duty construction]. Vestnik of Demidov Yaroslavl State University. Humanities. 2021; 15-2 (56): 220-231. (In Russ.).
31. Tarusina N. N. Sudebnaya praktika po semeynym delam: problemy usmotreniya na grani pravotvorchestva [Court practice in family disputes: problems of discretion on the verge of law-making]. Lex russica. 2019; 5: 40-48. (In Russ.).
32. Tarusina N. N. Zakonodatelstvo o brake i seme: bolee sta let dvizheniya po spiralyam rossiyskoy istorii [Legislation of marriage and family: over a hundred years of Russian history downward spiralling]. Sotsialno-yuridicheskaya tetrad. 2017; 7: 5-45. (In Russ.).
33. Tarusina N. N. Neskolko tezisov ob ogranicheniyakh prav i svobod grazhdan v chrezvychaynykh obstoyatelstvakh pandemii [Several arguments on restrictions on the rights and freedoms of citizens in pandemic emergencies]. Lex russica. 2021; 74-8 (177): 99-109 (In Russ.).
34. Trofimets I. A. Aktualnye voprosy zaklyucheniya i prekrashcheniya braka na postsovetskom prostranstve [Topical issues of marriage and termination in the post-Soviet space]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2012. (In Russ.).
35. Fedorova L. F. O problemakh realizatsii prava rebenka na vyrazhenie svoego mneniya [Problems of realization of the right of the child to express his(her) opinion]. Eurasian Advocacy. 2014; 5 (12): 78-84. (In Russ.).
36. Khazova O. A. Ustanovlenie ottsovstva [Establishing paternity]. Zakon. 1997; 11: 83-84. (In Russ.).
37. Shapovalenko I. A. Psikhologiya razvitiya i vozrastnaya psikhologiya [Developmental psychology and age psychology]. Moscow: Yurayt Publ.; 2012. (In Russ.).
38. Tsymbalyuk V. A. Ustanovlenie vozrastnogo tsenza pri usynovlenii nesovershennoletnego [The age limit for the adoption of a minor]. Young Scientist. 2017; 23 (157): 240-243. (In Russ.).
39. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. [Textbook of Russian Civil Law]. Kazan; 1905. (In Russ.).
40. Elkonin D. B. Vvedenie v detskuyu psikhologiyu [Introduction to child psychology]. Selected psychological works. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ.; 1989. (In Russ.).
41. Erdelevsky A. M. Pravo rebenka na vyrazhenie mneniya [The right of a child to express an opinion]. Law Reference System «ConsultantPlus».
42. Erickson E. G. Detstvo i obshchestvo [Childhood and society]. St. Petersburg: AST Publ.; 1996. (In Russ.).
43. Yakushev P. A. Minimalnyy vozrast vstupleniya v brak: traditsionnoe i pravovoe regulirovanie [Minimum age of marriage: traditional and legal regulation]. Family and Housing Law. 2017; 4: 33-36. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Tarusina N.N. Age as a Legal Fact in the Family Sphere: Temptations and Conventionality of the Number of Years. Lex Russica. 2022;75(10):17-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.191.10.017-032