The Principles of International Family Mediation

   Mediation among alternative ways of dispute resolution, along with conciliation and negotiations, occupies priority positions, having shown its effectiveness in comparison with judicial and administrative forms of protection of the rights and legitimate interests. The attractiveness of mediation lies precisely in the simplicity and convenience of the procedure itself, a calm atmosphere of dialogue mediated by a mediator and the obligation to resolve the conflict fairly with due regard to the opinions of all parties involved. Mediation originated as a technique for the family law disputes resolution and it is still widely used for this category of disputes and for cross-border (international) intra-family conflicts as the optimal form of dialogue between conflicting family members. Fundamental principles of mediation — the guiding principles of construction — predetermine its attractiveness as conciliation prosedure. This social institution is based on voluntariness, confidentiality, impartiality and neutrality, applicability, decisions made by the participants themselves, availability of independent legal support for each of the participants, priority of the rights and legitimate interests of minors, understanding and taking into account cultural differences between family members, as well as special qualification requirements applied to international family mediators. In some cases, mediation really avoids seeking legal assistance from judicial and administrative authorities, and in some cases it accelerates the processes of proceedings involving representatives of judicial or executive authorities. For cross-border intra-family disputes, this approach is very relevant, since the international family mediator, while mediating, does not ignore cultural, religious and social differences between disputing family members. In addition, a mediation agreement does not become enforceable at its conclusion. A mediation agreement becomes enforceable only when confirmed by a court or notary, which provides it with the coercive force of the state.

1. Valynkina I. A., Poroshin E. K voprosu o printsipakh mediatsii (posrednichestva) [To a question on principles of mediation (intermediary)]. Vestnik of Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2011; 1 (19): 117-120. (In Russ.).

2. Dobrolyubova E. Mediatsiya v sisteme sposobov zashchity prav predprinimateley: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Mediation in the system of ways to protect the rights of entrepreneurs: Author’s Abstract]. Moscow; 2012. (In Russ.).

3. Erokhina E. A. Posrednichestvo pri razreshenii transgranichnykh semeynykh sporov: tsennosti evropeyskogo semeynogo prava [Cross-Border Family Mediation of Values European Family Law]. Omsk State University Herald. Law. 2018; 4 (57): 92-100. (In Russ.).

4. Kaplun O. Yu., Miller V. A. Mezhdunarodnaya semeynaya mediatsiya [International Family Mediation]. Skif. Voprosy studencheskoy nauki. 2019; 6 (34): 132-135. (In Russ.).

5. Krysova V. G. Ispolzovanie instituta mediatsii pri razreshenii sporov v mezhdunarodnom semeynom prave [The use of the institute of mediation in dispute resolution in international family law]. International Law. 2017; 10. (In Russ.).

6. Kuropatskaya E. G. Mediatsiya kak sposob zashchity prav rebenka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Mediation as a way to protect the rights of the child in the Russian Federation]. Mediation and Law. 2013; 1: 4-8. (In Russ.).

7. Lebedinskaya V. P. Semeynaya mediatsiya kak novyy dlya Rossiyskoy Federatsii sposob zashchity prav i interesov detey [Family mediation as a new way for the Russian Federation to protect the rights and interests of children]. Bulletin of the Essentuki Institute of Management, Business and Law. 2017; 14: 42-48. (In Russ.).

8. Purge A. R. Primenenie protsedury mediatsii dlya uregulirovaniya raznoglasiy, voznikayushchikh iz semeynykh pravootnosheniy: opyt i puti razvitiya [Application of mediation procedure for settlement of disagreements arising from family legal relations: experience and ways of development]. Eurasian Advocacy. 2016; 4 (23): 41-49. (In Russ.).

9. Khudoykina T. V., Bryzhinskiy A. A. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya mediatsii [Problems and development prospects mediation]. Legal Policy and Legal Life. 2011; 3: 109-115. (In Russ.).

10. Chashkova S. Yu. Konkurentsiya semeyno-pravovykh dogovorov i mediativnykh soglasheniy, napravlennykh na regulirovanie semeyno-pravovykh sporov [Competition between Family Law Contracts and Mediation Agreements Aimed at Regulating Family Law Disputes]. Lex russica. 2022; 75 (4): 50-62. (In Russ.).

11. Shkryl E. O. Semeynaya mediatsiya v Rossii: sostoyanie, problemy i vozmozhnosti primeneniya [Family mediation in Russia: status, problems and application possibilities]. Law and Global Society. 2016; 2: 1061-1062. (In Russ.).

12. Garcia Villaluenga L., Vazquez de Castro E. La mediación civil en España: Luces y sombras de un marco normativo. Política y Sociedad. 2013; 50 (1): 71-98.

13. Gómez M., Francisco J. La mediación como método adecuado de resolución de conflictos en el ámbito familiar. Tratado de mediación. 2017; 3: 165-172.