Freedom of Assembly in Opinions and Reports of Venice Commission and Russian Legislation

   The paper is devoted to the consideration in the Russian constitutional legislation of the legal stances of the European Commission for Democracy through Law» (Venice Commission) in the field of freedom of peaceful assembly. Freedom of peaceful assembly is closely associated with political struggle, relationship between civil society and the authorities. It is fixed at the constitutional level and therefore is a sensitive topic in law enforcement practice and relevant in special scientific research, of which there are currently a small number in Russian and foreign science of constitutional law. Therefore, this article, as applied to the Russian Federation, aims to complete this gap. The implementation of the research tasks was achieved on the basis of the analysis of the Guidelines of the Venice Commission on Consolidation of Freedom of Peaceful Assembly in the legislation of European states. The author used the following research methods: comparative legal, logical, institutional, formal legal, comparative legal. The paper examines the legal principles of the Venice Commission on Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and the extent to which they are taken into account in the constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation. The conclusion is made about the narrow understanding of freedom of peaceful assembly reflected in the wording «the right to assemble peacefully without weapons». In this regard, the Federal Law on Assemblies is devoted not to freedom of peaceful assembly but to the right to assemble peacefully, which may be restricted by the State to a greater extent than freedom of peaceful assembly. This created the basis for a positivist regulation of freedom of peaceful assembly with broad powers of public authorities and the possibility of restricting the right to assemble peacefully, without weapons, while, according to the Venice Commission, the State should create adequate mechanisms and procedures to ensure that freedom of peaceful assembly is not subjected to excessive bureaucratic regulation. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation has largely adjusted Russian legislation on public events, bringing it closer to the legal standings developed by the Venice Commission.

1. Afanasyev S. Obzor pravovykh pozitsiy v postanovleniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii [Review of legal positions in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Russia]. Comparative Constitutional Review. 2019; 4. (In Russ.).

2. Berezin A. A. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie narusheniyam, posyagayushchim na obshchestvennyy poryadok i obshchestvennuyu bezopasnost pri provedenii publichnykh meropriyatiy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Administrative and legal counteraction to violations encroaching on public order and public safety during public events: Author’s Abstract]. Saratov; 2015. (In Russ.).

3. Vdovichenko K. G. Ugolovno-pravovoe protivodeystvie prestupleniyam v sfere organizatsii i provedeniya publichnykh massovykh meropriyatiy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Criminal-legal counteraction to crimes in the sphere of organization and holding of public mass events: Author’s Abstract]. Krasnodar; 2015. (In Russ.).

4. Kondrashev A. A. Svoboda sobraniy v Rossii: sistemnye defekty zakonodatelstva i politiko-pravovaya praktika [Freedom of assembly in Russia: system defects of law and political and legal practices]. Comparative Constitutional Review. 2017; 6. (In Russ.).

5. Kostyleva E. D. Sootnoshenie pozitsiy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF i Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka po zashchite lichnykh i politicheskikh prav [Correlation of positions of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation and the european court of human rights on protection of personal and political rights]. Modern Lawyer. 2019; 4. (In Russ.).

6. Kartashkin V. A., Lukasheva E. A. (eds.). Akty o pravakh cheloveka [International human rights acts]. Moscow; 1998. (In Russ.).

7. Salenko A. A. Konstitutsionno-pravovoe znachenie svobody mirnykh sobraniy: doktrinalnye i sudebnye podkhody v Rossii i Germanii [Constitutional and legal significance of freedom of peaceful assembly: Doctrinal and Judicial approaches in Russia and Germany]. Russian Juridical Journal. 2019; 5. (In Russ.).

8. Salenko A. A. Svoboda mirnykh sobraniy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: neskolko tezisov ob aktualnykh problemakh [Freedom of peaceful assembly in the Russian Federation: some head-notes and critical issues]. Journal of Russian Law. 2018; 1. (In Russ.).

9. Sambor N. A. Administrativno-pravovye aspekty prava na svobodu mirnykh sobraniy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i ee sudebnaya zashchita [Administrative and legal aspects of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly in the Russian Federation and its judicial protection]. Administrative Law and Process. 2021; 3. (In Russ.).

10. Taribo E. A. Problemy realizatsii svobody vyrazheniya mneniy i svobody sobraniy v praktike konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya [The issues of exercising of the freedom of expressions and the freedom of assembly in the constitutional justice practice]. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2018; 2: 20-31. (In Russ.).

11. Khramova T. M. Ogranicheniya konstitutsionnoy svobody sobraniy: sravnitelno-pravovoy analiz: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Restrictions of constitutional freedom of assembly: comparative legal analysis: Author’s Abstract]. Moscow; 2015. (In Russ.).

12. Yakovenko M. A. The constitutional right of citizens of the Russian Federation to hold public events: theoretical and practical aspects: Author’s Abstract]. Moscow; 2012. (In Russ.).

13. Alexander V. S. Exploring a More Independent Freedom in Peaceful Assembly in Canada. Western Journal of Legal Studies. 2018; 8.

14. Hoffmann-Riem W. The Venice Commission of the European Council — Standards and Impact. The European Journal of International Law. 2014; 25 (2).