Harmful Information in Internet Media: The «Overton Window» and Destructive Network Content Interrelationships

The paper is devoted to the analysis of Internet media monitoring for the dissemination of destructive content and the comparison of the identified types of information of aggressive and (auto)destructive nature with legally fixed prohibitions and restrictions on the right to freedom of information dissemination. The author considers the issues of networking and decentralization of destructive communities in Runet and the development of radical movements using the Ingamasi technology. Taking into account the patterns of distribution of various types of destructive content revealed during the study, including the peculiarities of communication in network communities of different types, the refraction of the «Overton window» theory to the media field of the dissemination of destructive information in Internet media was scientifically justified.

Despite the existence of a regulatory framework for ensuring the information security of the individual, the realities of the development of communication in the digital environment demonstrate the presence of many gray areas. New communication and content risks require a systemic transformation and updating of the legal regulation of the digital environment in order to ensure the information and ideological security of the individual. Given the trends in the spread of new types of aggressive and depressive-suicidal content discussed in the paper, the author concludes that it is necessary to normalize new types of prohibited and restricted information by making systemic changes to the Federal Law «On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection», the Federal Law «On the Protection of Children from Information that causes Harm their health and development», the Law of the Russian Federation «On Mass Media», as well as the improvement of administrative and criminal legislation, including through the introduction of new elements of offenses (crimes).

1. Amelina YaA. Benefis nenavisti. Kak «kolumbaynery» i kerchenskiy ubiytsa Vladislav Roslyakov stali «geroyami» rossiyskoy destruktivnoy molodezhi [Hatred Benefit. How the Columbineers and the Kerch murderer Vladislav Roslyakov became the «heroes» of the Russian destructive youth]. Kavkazskiy geopoliticheskiy klub [The Caucasus Geopolitical Club]. Moscow: Publisher Vorobyov A.V.; 2019. (In Russ.).

2. Afanasyev A. Deti Interneta, chto oni smotryat i kto imi upravlyaet [Children of the Internet, what they watch and who controls them]. Moscow: Nashe zavtra Publ.; 2021. (In Russ.).

3. Nikishin VD, editor. Vyyavlenie i profilaktika destruktivnoy propagandy v molodezhnoy i podrostkovoy srede: metodicheskoe posobie [Identification and prevention of destructive propaganda in the youth and adolescent environment: Methodology Guidelines]. Moscow: Pervyy tom Publ.; 2021. (In Russ.).

4. Gurov FN. Informatizatsiya obshchestva i transformatsiya subekta kommunikativnykh praktik [Informatization of society and transformation of the subject of communicative practices]. Gumanitarnyy vestnik [The Humanities Bulletin]. 2019;4(78). (In Russ.).

5. Nikishin VD. Kolumbayn (skulshuting): sushchnost, pravovaya kvalifikatsiya, kriminalisticheskaya diagnostika [The Columbine (School shooting): Essence, legal qualification, forensic diagnostics]. Lex russica. 2021;74(11):62-76. (In Russ.).

6. Nikishin VD. Transformatsiya instituta lichnoy bezopasnosti v usloviyakh novoy realnosti: informatsionnomirovozzrencheskaya bezopasnost tsifrovoy kommunikatsii [Transformation of the institute of personal security in the conditions of a new reality: Information and ideological security of digital communication]. In: Blazheev VV, Egorova MA, editors. Pravo i obshchestvo v epokhu sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh preobrazovaniy XXI veka: opyt Rossii, ES, SShA i Kitaya: kollektivnaya monografiya k 90-letiyu Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYu) [Law and Society in the Era of socio-economic transformations of the 21st century: The Experience of Russia, the EU, the USA and China. A collective monograph for the 90th anniversary of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)]. Moscow; 2021. Pp. 265–284. (In Russ.).

7. Nikishin VD, Bogatyrev KM. Fanfikshn: ponyatie, istoriya i mesto v klassifikatsii obektov sudebnoy lingvisticheskoy ekspertizy [Fanfiction: Concept, history and place in the classification of objects of forensic linguistic expertise]. Sudebnaya ekspertiza [Forensic examination]. 2020;3(63):114-127. (In Russ.).

8. Sundiev IYu. Evolyutsiya verbovochnykh tekhnologiy v tsifrovuyu epokhu [The evolution of recruitment technologies in the digital age]. Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii [Scientific Portal of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2018;1(41):67-76. (In Russ.).

9. Yakoba IA. Dekonstruktsiya tekhnologii «okno Overtona» v amerikanskom mediynom diskurse [Deconstruction of the «Overton window» technology in American Media Discourse]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Cherepovets State University Bulletin]. 2019;5(92):175-187. (In Russ.).

10. Hoffman B, Ware J, Shapiro E. Assessing the Threat of Incel Violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. 2020;43(7):565-587. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2020.1751459.