Declared and True Goals of Criminal Punishment

The goals of punishment, enshrined in Part 2 of Article 43 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, should actually act as one of the key guidelines for the law enforcement officer when individualizing punishment. At the same time, the existing construction is rightly criticized as abstract and devoid of practical meaning. The purpose of the paper is to develop recommendations for improving criminal legislation in terms of regulating practice-oriented goals of punishment. To achieve this goal, the author has substantiated inappropriateness of attributing norms on the purposes of punishment to declarative norms, demonstarted incorrectness of specifying restoration of social justice and prevention of new crimes as the goals of punishment, explained stable failure to fulfill the goal of correcting convicts with due regard to indicators in Russia (from 2008 to 2021), highlighted the approach based on the expediency of normative consolidation of two goals of punishment (taking into account the requirements of unification (correlation with the tasks of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), and focused on possibilities and expected results), namely, unconditional and complete restoration of the rights violated by the crime and correction of convicts. Taking into account pecularities of the existing system of types of punishment that actually makes the first of these goals unattainable, the author proposes to adjust norms regulating certain types of punishment (in essence, restorative principles should be referred to as exclusively fiscal in nature as existing punishments): priority compensation for damage caused to the victim, and only with full (or maximum possible in specific circumstances) compensation for all violated rights of the victim compensation to the State budget. The author argues that the goal of correcting a convicted person, despite being difficult to achieve (especially by criminal legal means), is necessary because it has regulatory potential.

1. Alikperov HD. Novye podkhody k poznaniyu sushchnosti nakazaniya. Postanovka problemy [New approaches to understanding the essence of punishment. Problem setting]. Criminal Judicial Proceeding. 2020;2:36-42. (In Russ.).

2. Arendarenko AV. Obshchepravovoy printsip sotsialnoy spravedlivosti i ego realizatsiya v sovremennom ugolovnom prave Rossii (teoretiko-pravovye aspekty): avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [The general legal principle of social justice and its implementation in modern criminal law of Russia (theoretical and legal aspects): Author’s Abstract]. Moscow: 2009. (In Russ.).

3. Babaev MM, Pudovochkin YuE. O tselyakh nakazaniya [About the purposes of punishment]. Russian Investigator. 2022;5:46-50. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3783-2022-5-46-50. (In Russ.).

4. Golik YuV, Inogamova-Hegai LV, Komissarov VS, Nomokonov VA. О национальной концепции уголовного права [On the national concept of criminal law]. Criminal Law. 2006;2:18-20. (In Russ.).

5. Gracheva YuV, Chuchaev AI. Tseli nakazaniya v zakone, teorii i obshchestvennom mnenii: realnye i mnimye [The purposes of punishment in legislation, theory and public opinion: the real and illusory ones]. Zakon. 2021:12:172-188. (In Russ.).

6. Gurinskaya AL. Anglo-amerikanskaya model preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [The Anglo-American model of crime prevention: Author’s Abstract]. Kaliningrad; 2018. (In Russ.).

7. Zhuk MS. Instituty rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava: ponyatie, sistema i perspektivy razvitiya: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Institutes of Russian criminal law: concept, system and prospects of development: Author’s Abstract]. Krasnodar; 2013. (In Russ.).

8. Kuznetsov AP, Kurdyukov SI. Tseli ugolovnogo nakazaniya: teoretiko-prikladnoe issledovanie [State of intoxication as an aggravating circumstance and the procedure for its determination]. Russian Justitia. 2019;3:4-7 (In Russ.0.

9. Lapshin VF. Istinnaya tsel ugolovnogo nakazaniya i kriterii ee dostizhimosti [The true purpose of criminal punishment and the criteria for its attainability]. Journal of Russian Law. 2018;5(257):75-85. DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_5_8. (In Russ.).

10. Malysheva OA. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika Rossiyskogo gosudarstva i ee realizatsiya na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Modern criminal policy of the Russian state and its implementation at the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings: Doctoral Dissertation]. Ryazan; 2006. (In Russ.).

11. Naumov AV. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: kurs lektsiy. [Russian criminal law: a course of lectures]. Vol. 1: General part. Moscow: Volters Kluwer; 2011. (In Russ.).

12. Novichkov VE, Sheveleva SV. Uchenie o sushchnosti nakazaniya: istoriya i sovremennost [The doctrine of the essence of punishment: History and modernity]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011;6(1):88-195. (In Russ.).

13. Noah IS. Voprosy teorii nakazaniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave [Questions of the theory of punishment in Soviet criminal law]. Saratov; 1962. (In Russ.).

14. Serebrennikova AV. Nravstvennoe obosnovanie sistemy ugolovnykh nakazaniy [Ethical justification of the criminal system]. Journal of Russian Law. 2021;25(12):41-46. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2021.146. (In Russ.).

15. Temirkhanov MA. Tseli ugolovnogo nakazaniya i protsessa nakazyvaniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The goals of criminal punishment and the process of punishment: Author’s Abstract]. Ryazan; 2014. (In Russ.).

16. Fatkhutdinov AI. Tseli nakazaniya i pravovoe regulirovanie mekhanizma ikh dostizheniya po UK RF: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The goals of punishment and the legal regulation of the mechanism of their achievement under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: Author’s abstract]. Kazan; 2003. (In Russ.).

17. Brooks Th. Is Hegel a Retributivist? Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain. 2004;49/50:113-126.