International Special Operations: Concept, Problems of International Legal Support, Countering Challenges and Threats to the Security of States

The problem of the implementation of international legal support of special operations is a natural, historically determined and in fact staying beyond the conventional scope of international law. In fact, this is an emerging international custom based on the practice of states in defending national interests in conditions of competing jurisdiction, the legalization of the resources of the «shadow» economy, the spread of the Darknet, the development of new ways and means of warfare and its propaganda. The transnationalization of organized crime, its links with international terrorism, corruption, cybercrime, attempts to build national security systems at the expense of the security of others, the destructive ideology of national domination, accompanied by the «privatization» of state sovereignty by non-state actors, substantiates the practice of implementing special operations against existing and newly created existential challenges and threats to the security of states.

The institutionalization of some types of international special operations is obvious, based on the provisions of the UN Charter, multilateral and bilateral agreements, correlates with the activities of regional security systems (Collective Security Treaty Organization — CSTO, North Atlantic Treaty Organization — NATO, League of Arab States — LAS, Organization of American States — OAS, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe — OSCE, etc.). The uniqueness of special operations in each specific case, the impossibility of their absolute legal settlement, especially in the military-political sphere, raises the question of the need to revise a number of provisions of the UN Charter as ineffective, the formation of new (unipolar) regional mechanisms for monitoring their implementation, the activation of special scientific research in this area.

1. Archakov VYu, Bankovskiy AL, Zenchenko EV. Darknet v kontekste riskov natsionalnoy bezopasnosti [Darknet in the context of national security risks]. Pravo.by. 2021;6(74):5-10. (In Russ.).

2. Bankovskiy AL. K voprosu o kontseptualizatsii v sfere natsionalnoy bezopasnosti [On the issue of conceptualization in the field of national security]. In: Sovremennyy mir i natsionalnye interesy Respubliki Belarus: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Minsk, 17 dek. 2021 g. [The Modern World and the National interests of the Republic of Belarus: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Minsk, 17 Dec. 2022]. Minsk: BSU Publ.; 2021. Pp. 35–39. (In Russ.).

3. Biryukov PN. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: ucheb. posobie [International law: A study guide]. Moscow: Yurist Publ.; 1998. (In Russ.).

4. Bismillakh M. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoy mekhanizm uregulirovaniya vnutrigosudarstvennykh konfliktov kak yuridicheskaya osnova politiki natsionalnogo primireniya v fganistane: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The international legal mechanism for the settlement of intra-state conflicts as the legal basis for the policy of national reconciliation in Afghanistan. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.).

5. Boguslavskiy MM. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik [International private law: A textbook]. Moscow: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya Publ.; 1994. (In Russ.).

6. Valeev DM. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy sotrudnichestva po borbe s transnatsionalnoy organizovannoy prestupnostyu: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [International legal bases of cooperation in combating transnational organized crime. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Kazan; 2016. (In Russ.).

7. Verlup SV. Natsionalnaya bezopasnost na gosudarstvennoy granitse: idei, mneniya, predlozheniya: monografiya [National security at the state border: Ideas, opinions, proposals. A monograph]. Minsk: VA RB Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).

8. Gavrilenko VG. Pravovye osnovy i mekhanizmy obespecheniya natsionalnoy bezopasnosti i suvereniteta Respubliki Belarus [Legal bases and mechanisms for ensuring national security and sovereignty of the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).

9. Godunov IV. Protivodeystvie organizovannoy prestupnosti: ucheb. posobie [Countering organized crime: A study guide]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.).

10. Dovgan EF. Dogovornye obyazatelstva chastey territorii gosudarstva [Contractual obligations of parts of the territory of the State]. Pravo.by. 2022;1(75):95-103. (In Russ.).

11. Dovgan EF. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i podderzhanie mezhdunarodnogo mira i bezopasnosti: monografiya. [International organizations and the maintenance of international peace and security: A monograph]. Minsk: Mezhdunar. un-t «MITSO»; 2016. (In Russ.).

12. Dovgan EF. K voprosu o pravomernosti vooruzhennykh antiterroristicheskikh mer v kontekste printsipa nevmeshatelstva vo vnutrennie dela gosudarstv [On the question of the legality of armed anti-terrorist measures in the context of the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of states]. Belorusskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy [Belarusian Journal of International Law and International Relations]. 2003;3:3-12. (In Russ.).

13. Zhdanov YuN. Prinuditelnye mery v mezhdunarodnom prave: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Coercive measures in international law. Dr. Sci. (Law) Dissertation]. Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.).

14. Kalugin VYu. Prestupleniya protiv mira, bezopasnosti chelovechestva i voennye prestupleniya: ugolovno-pravovoy analiz [Crimes against peace, human security and war crimes: Criminal law analysis]. Minsk: Tesey Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.).

15. Karpets II. Prestupleniya mezhdunarodnogo kharaktera [Crimes of an international nature]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ.; 1979. (In Russ.).

16. Kritsiy KV. Sanktsii i odnostoronnie ogranichitelnye mery v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Sanctions and unilateral restrictive measures in modern international law. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.).

17. Kupina NA. Ideologema «inostrannyy agent»: tri dnya v iyule 2012 goda [Ideologeme «foreign agent»: three days in July 2012]. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political linguistics]. 2012;3:43-48. (In Russ.).

18. Lewis DE. Normy i podotchetnost. Bezopasnost i mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v kiberprostranstve [Rules and accountability. Security and international cooperation in cyberspace]. In: Sbornik dokladov uchastnikov 15-go Mezhdunarodnogo foruma «Partnerstvo gosudarstva, biznesa i grazhdanskogo obshchestva pri obespechenii mezhdunarodnoy informatsionnoy bezopasnosti» [Collection of reports of the participants of the 15th International Forum «Partnership of the state, business and Civil Society in ensuring international information security»]. Moscow; 2021. Pp. 51–53. (In Russ.).

19. Makarov OS. Pravovoe obespechenie informatsionnoy bezopasnosti na primere zashchity gosudarstvennykh sekretov gosudarstv — uchastnikov Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Legal provision of information security based on the case of the protection of state secrets of the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Abstract of the Dr. Sci. (Law) Dissertation]. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.).

20. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast: ucheb. posobie [Public International Law. Special part. A study guide]. Minsk: Amalfea Publ.; 2011. (In Russ.).

21. Milinchuk VV. Sanktsii SB OON kak mekhanizm obespecheniya mezhdunarodno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstv v sfere borby s transnatsionalnoy prestupnostyu [UN Security Council sanctions as a mechanism to ensure the international legal responsibility of states in the fight against transnational crime]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2011;8:211-216. (In Russ.).

22. Mikhaylov NG. Mezhdunarodnyy ugolovnyy tribunal po byvshey Yugoslavii: kompetentsiya, istochniki, prava, osnovnye printsipy deyatelnosti [The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: Competence, sources, rights, basic principles of activity]. Moscow: Publishing house of Shumilova II; 2006. (In Russ.).

23. Moroz NO. Propaganda voyny v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave [Propaganda of war in modern international law]. Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo glazami belorusskoy obshchestvennosti: materialy mezhdunar. nauch. foruma [International humanitarian law through the eyes of the Belarusian public: Proceedings of the International scientific forum]. Minsk: BSU Publ.; 2020. Pp. 16–29. (In Russ.).

24. Moroz NO. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe sotrudnichestvo v borbe s prestupnostyu v sfere vysokikh tekhnologiy: monografiya [International legal cooperation in the fight against crime in the field of high technologies: A monograph]. Minsk: Mezhdunar. un-t «MITSO»; 2017. (In Russ.).

25. Ovchinsky V, Zhdanov Yu. Organizovannaya kiberprestupnost [Organized cybercrime]. Available from: https://zavtra.ru/blogs/organizovannaya_kiberprestupnost_ [cited: June 26, 2022]. (In Russ.).

26. Popov VI. Aktualnye problemy borby s naibolee opasnymi proyavleniyami organizovannoy prestupnosti: monografiya [Current problems of combating the most dangerous manifestations of organized crime: A monograph]. Moscow: SGU Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).

27. Rodevich VCh, Tupeko SS. Transnatsionalnaya prestupnost: teoriya i praktika borby v Respublike Belarus [Transnational crime: theory and practice of struggle in the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk: Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Belarus; 2012. (In Russ.).

28. Ruvinskiy RZ. Pravoporyadok v period globalnogo krizisa: transformatsii, tendentsii, ugrozy [The rule of law during the global crisis: transformations, trends, threats]. St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).

29. Samarina VI. Interpol. Mezhdunarodnaya organizatsiya ugolovnoy politsii [Interpol. International Criminal Police Organization]. St. Petersburg: Peter Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).

30. Smirnov MG. Vooruzhennyy konflikt nemezhdunarodnogo kharaktera: mezhdunarodno-pravovoy aspekt: monografiya [Non-international armed conflict: international legal aspect. A monograph]. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.).

31. Trakhimenok SV. Bezopasnost gosudarstva. Metodologo-pravovye aspekty: monografiya [State security. Methodological and legal aspects. A monograph]. Minsk: Bel. izd. tov-o «Hata»; 1997. (In Russ.).

32. Ustinov VV. Mezhdunarodnyy opyt borby s terrorizmom: standarty i praktika [International experience in combating terrorism: standards and practice]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.).

33. Fisenko IV. Borba s mezhdunarodnymi prestupleniyami v mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom prave [Combating international crimes in international criminal law]. Minsk: Tesey Publ.; 2000. (In Russ.).

34. Hill TI. Sovremennye teorii poznaniya [Contemporary Theories of Knowledge]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Progress Publ.; 1965. (In Russ.).

35. Allison R. Russian Revisionism, Legal Discourse and the ‘Rules-Based’ International Order. Europe-Asia Studies. 2020;72(6):976-995. ISSN 0966-8136. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1773406.

36. Bilms K. Past as Prelude? Envisioning the Future of Special Operations. Available from: https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2021/11/12/past-as-prelude-envisioning-the-future-of-special-operations [cited June 27, 2022].

37. Brailey M. The Transformation of Special Operations Forces in Contemporary Conflicts: Strategy, Missions, Organisation and Tactics. Land Warfare Studies Centre. Working Paper. No. 127. November 2005.

38. Bowman ME. Secrets in Plain View: Covert Action the US Way. International Law Studies Series. US Naval War College. 1998;72:1-16.

39. Buzan B, Hansen L. The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge University Press; 2009.

40. Frank TM. Collective security and the UN reform: Between the necessary and possible. Chicago J. of Intern. Law. 2005;2:597-611.

41. Megkishin VV. Non-state actors as quasi-subjects of transnational organised crime: implications for the security of states. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations. 2022;1:66-73.

42. Mumford A. Proxy Warfare. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2013.

43. Neuhold H. Collective security after «Operation allied force». Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law. 2000;4.

44. Neuman GL. Anomalous Zones. Stanford Law Review. 1996;48(5).

45. Perisic P. Invitation by Intervention — When Can Consent from a Host State Justify Foreign Military Intervention? Available from: https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-4-4-29 [cited June 27, 2022].

46. The continued use of the statute [FARA] as a subversive control act means that the term «foreign agent» will continue to carry pejorative connotations. Harvard Law Review. 1965;78(3).

47. Robinson L. The Future of Special Operations: Beyond Kill and Capture. Foreign Affaires. 2012;91(6).

48. Virally M. Panorama du droit international contemporain. Cours général de droit international public (Volume 183). In: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789024732487_01 [cited June 27, 2022].

49. Visser L. Intervention by invitation and collective self-defence: two sides of the same coin? Journal on the Use of Force and International Law. 2020;7(2):292-316. ISSN 2053-1702. DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2020.1834767.

50. Wirt JJ. The Abbottabad raid and the theory of special operations. Journal of Strategic Studies. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2021.1933953.