Comparative Analysis of Objective Signs of Illicit Obtaining of a Loan under the Criminal Code of the People’s Republic of China and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.197.4.040-060
Abstract
The global financial crisis and its consequences have now received a new round of development in both the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation. These events very clearly demonstrate their negative impact on society and its vital activity. And as a consequence of a difficult economic situation in these two countries, the credit and banking sector of the economy today is one of the most criminogenic. The paper is devoted to the analysis of the objective composition of the illegal receipt of a loan provided for in the Criminal Code of the People’s Republic of China and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The author examines statutory regulation in Article 175.1 of the Criminal Code of the People’s Republic of China and Article 176 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of mandatory signs in the context of the object, subject and other characteristics of the facts of the crime. The analysis of the legal provisions on illegal receipt of a loan indicates a number of problems related to understanding the immediate object of the crime in question, its subject and certain signs of the facts of the crime, as well as the existence of legislative gaps in the criminal law regulation of this crime in both countries. These are, first of all, the problems of legal benefits (the object of the crime) that are encroached upon by the illegal receipt of a loan, i.e., what will be its specific object and what will be the direct object; whether it is worth providing for an independent composition in relation to the state special-purpose loan with a special part; whether such negotiable documents (financial bills) as a letter of credit, accounting bills, a letter of guarantee, etc. should be included in the scope of the objects of this crime; whether there is a need to replace the norm «knowingly false information about the economic situation and financial condition» of Article 176 of the Criminal Code with the wording «deceptive method», etc. All these issues require a mandatory solution.
Keywords
About the Author
Dongmei PanChina
Pan Dongmei, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor of the Law Institute; Head; Honorary Scholar of the «Huanhe» Henan University
85 Minglun Street, Kaifong, China, 475001
References
1. Gorelik AS, Shishko IV, Khlupina GH. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatelnosti i protiv interesov sluzhby v kommercheskikh i inykh organizatsiyakh [Crimes in the sphere of economic activity and against the interests of service in commercial and other organizations]. Krasnoyarsk; 1998. (In Russ.).
2. Guev AN. Kommentariy k UK RF (dlya predprinimateley) [Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (for entrepreneurs)]. Moscow: Examen Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.).
3. Guev AN. Kommentariy k UK RF (dlya predprinimateley) [Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (for entrepreneurs)]. Moscow: Examen Publ.; 2009. (In Russ.).
4. Demyanenko L Pereterskiy IS (eds). Ugolovno-pravovoy analiz nezakonnogo polucheniya gosudarstvennogo tselevogo kredita i ispolzovaniya ego ne po pryamomu naznacheniyu [Criminal law analysis of illegal receipt of the state special-purpose credit and its indirect use]. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Education and teaching. 2014;15:
5. Skuratov YuI, Lebedev VM (eds). Pereterskiy IS (eds). [Commentary to the Criminal Code Of the Russian Federation]. Moscow; Infra‑M — Norma Pub.; 1996. (In Russ.).
6. Kudryavtsev VN. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy [General theory of crime qualification]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1972. (In Russ.).
7. Nikolskaya L Pereterskiy IS (eds). Nezakonnoe poluchenie kredita i zlostnoe uklonenie ot pogasheniya kreditorskoy zadolzhennosti: ugolovno-pravovoy aspekt: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. [Illegal receipt of a loan and malicious evasion from repayment of accounts payable: criminal-legal aspect: Cand. Sci. Diss.] Rostovon-Don; 2005. (In Russ.).
8. Feoktistov MV. Otvetstvennost za nezakonnoe poluchenie kredita [Responsibility for illegally obtaining a loan]. In: Criminal law and criminological problems of combating crime in the economic sphere: Proceedings of Meeting of the Scientific Council of the Research Institute of Problems of Strengthening Law and Order under the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation. Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.).
9. Yani PS. Ekonomicheskie i sluzhebnye prestupleniya [Economic and official crimes]. Moscow; 1997. (In Russ.).
10. 张勇:《存贷犯罪刑法理论与实务》,上海人民出版社2012年版。(Zhang Yun. Theory of criminal law and practice on crimes related to deposits and loans. Shanghai People’s Publishing House; 2012).
11. 张明楷:《骗取贷款罪的保护法益及其运用》,《当代法学》2020年第1期。(Zhang Mincai. Protection of legal benefits from the crime of illegally obtaining a loan. Sovremennoe pavo [Modern Law]. 2020;1).
12. 张明楷:《骗取贷款罪的构造》,《清华法学》2019年第5期。(Zhang Mincai. Construction of the corpus delicti of obtaining a loan illegally. Sovremennoe pavo [Modern Law]. 2019;5).
13. 李永升:《金融刑法增补型犯罪研究》[M],北京:法律出版社2014年版。 (Li Yunsheng. Investigation of the added elements of crimes in financial criminal law. Beijing: Legal Press; 2014).
14. 柳忠卫:《骗取贷款、票据承兑、金融票证罪疑难、争议问题研究--兼论我国刑法立法模式的完善》,《法学评论》2009年第1 期。(Liu Zhongwei. Investigation of complex and controversial issues related to the illegal receipt of a loan, acceptance of a bill, financial documents. Improving the model of criminal legislation of our country. Obzor zakonodatel’stva [Law Review]. 2009;1).
15. 郝川、欧阳文星:《骗取贷款罪:反思与限定》,《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第44卷第3期。(Hao Chuan, Ouyang Wenxing. Illegal obtaining of credit: reflections and restrictions. Journal of Southwestern University. Social Sciences. 2018;3(44)).
16. 周光权.刑法各论(第三版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016版。 (Zhou Guanzhuang. Criminal law. The special part. 3rd ed. Beijing: Chinese People’s University Press; 2016).
17. 高铭暄、马克昌主编:《刑法学》(第八版)。北京:北京大学出版社,2017年。(Gao Mincoin, MA Cachan. Criminal law. 8th ed. Beijing: Publishing House of Peking University; 2017).
18. 俞燕.My额贷款公司案件适用骗取贷款罪的问题探析[J].中国检察官,2014年第6期。 (Yu. Jan. Analysis of the use of the crime of illegally obtaining a loan in the case of microfinance companies. Chinese Prosecutor. 2014;6).
19. 刘宪权,吴波.骗取小额贷款公司贷款行为的定性研究[J].中国刑事法杂志,2012年第9期。 (Liu Santwani, Wu Bo. The study of ualification of illegal obtaining of credit from small credit companies. Journal of Chinese Criminal Law. 2012;9).
20. 刘远:《金融欺诈犯罪立法原理与完善》,法律出版社2010年版。(Liu Yuan. The beginning and improvement of legislation on crimes related to financial fraud. Beijing: Legal Press; 201o).
21. 孙国祥:《骗取贷款罪司法认定的误识与匡正》,《法商研究》2016年第5期。(Sun Guoxiang. Error and correction in judicial practice on the application of illegal obtaining of credit. Law and Business Research. 2016;5).
Review
For citations:
Pan D. Comparative Analysis of Objective Signs of Illicit Obtaining of a Loan under the Criminal Code of the People’s Republic of China and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Lex Russica. 2023;76(4):40-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.197.4.040-060