Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

The Main Results of Criminal Law Reform in 2022: An Analytical Review

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.197.4.115-135

Abstract

The paper critically reflects on the changes in criminal legislation implemented in 2022: 15 federal laws, which changed the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, were adopted. A third of them is directly related to Russia conducting a special military operation. The review analyzes the most important changes, indicating the problems that arise in connection with their adoption, and suggests ways to solve these problems. The main results of the reform of the General Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (in particular, the expansion of the list of aggravating circumstances) are highlighted. In 2022, 16 new articles were included in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and 38 existing ones were subject to adjustments. The main trends of these changes include the expansion of criminalization, the strengthening of differentiation, and the tightening of criminal responsibility. The problems of differentiation of sexual crimes by taking into account the multiplicity of victims are critically investigated. An attempt is made to differentiate participation in an armed conflict and going over to the enemy’s side. The ratio of the bodies of crimes under Articles 207.3 and 280.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is analyzed with the need for unification in the criminal law of public appeals to violation of federal legislation. Some difficulties in the new understanding of torture are considered. The strengthening of artificial competition of criminal law norms on the example of the compositions provided for by new Articles 201.2, 201.3, 285.5, 285.6 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The main trends in the change of crimes against military service are identified. The unfaithfulness of the legislative regulation of criminal encroachments through the allocation as independent crimes of certain stages of an unfinished crime or types or forms of complicity in a crime on the example of anti-diversionary crime compositions is emphasized (Articles 281.1–281.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), etc.

About the Author

N. A. Lopashenko
Saratov State Law Academy
Russian Federation

Natalya A. Lopashenko, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Professor, Department of Criminal and Penal Enforcement Law

ul. Volskaya, d. 1, Saratov, Russia, 410056



References

1. Bodaevsky VP. Formirovanie ugolovnogo prava voennogo vremeni [Formation of the criminal law of wartime]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law]. 2022;17(2):128-154. (In Russ.).

2. Borkov VN. Otgranichenie pytki ot primeneniya nasiliya ili spetsialnykh sredstv pri prevyshenii dolzhnostnykh polnomochiy [Delineation of torture from the use of violence or special means when exceeding official powers]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2022;12:3-14. (In Russ.).

3. Borkov VN. Povyshena otvetstvennost za zloupotrebleniya pri vypolnenii gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza [Increased responsibility for abuses in the execution of the state defense order]. Zakonnost [Legality]. 2018;3:49-53. (In Russ.).

4. Veklenko V, Galyukova M. Istyazanie i pytka: ugolovno-pravovoy analiz [Tortures: Criminal law analysis]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2007;4. (In Russ.).

5. Gorelov A. Usilenie otvetstvennosti za polovye prestupleniya nad detmi [Strengthening responsibility for sexual crimes against children]. Administrativnoe pravo [Administrative law]. 2021;4:47-52. (In Russ.).

6. Grebenshchikov SP, Yani PS. Usilenie otvetstvennosti za polovye prestupleniya nad detmi [Responsibility for sexual crimes committed against minors]. Zakonnost [Legality]. 2018;5:40-44. 2018;6:39-51. (In Russ.).

7. Gusarova MV. Analiz nakazaniy za prestupleniya seksualnogo kharaktera i puti ikh optimizatsii [Analysis of punishments for sexual crimes and ways to optimize them]. Rossiyskiy sudya [Russian Judge]. 2022;1:19-23. (In Russ.).

8. Ermolovich YaN. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za nenadlezhashchee ispolnenie gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza i narushenie poryadka osushchestvleniya gosudarstvennykh zakupok [Criminal liability for improper execution of the state defense order and violation of the procedure for public procurement]. Oboronnopromyshlennyy kompleks: voprosy prava [Military-industrial complex: Questions of law]. 2019;1:15-26. (In Russ.).

9. Ivanov NG. Preyuditsialnost v UK RF v svete pozitsiy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF (na primere st. 116.1 UK RF) [Prejudice in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the light of the positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (Based on Article 116.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo [Criminal proceedings]. 2021;3:34-39. (In Russ.).

10. Karavaeva YuS. Mezhotraslevaya differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovno-pravovykh normakh s priznakami administrativnoy preyuditsii: zakonodatelnyy i pravoprimenitelnyy podkhody [Intersectoral Differentiation of Responsibility in Criminal Law Rules Involving Administrative Prejudice Elements: Legislative and Law Enforcement Approaches]. Lex Russica. 2022;75(8):81-98. (In Russ.).

11. Kursaev AV. Kvalifikatsiya otdelnykh prestupleniy protiv pravosudiya v novom postanovlenii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda [Classification of individual crimes against justice in the new resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2022;11. (In Russ.).

12. Lopashenko NA. Administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom prave — net! [No to administrative prejudice in criminal law!]. Vestnik Akademii Generalnoy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation]. 2011;3(23):64-70. (In Russ.).

13. Lopashenko NA. Sostavy prestupleniy s administrativnoy preyuditsiey — «svoi sredi chuzhikh»? [The elements of crimes with administrative prejudice — «their own among strangers»?]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel [Russian Investigator]. 2022;5:51-58. (In Russ.).

14. Petrova GO. Ugolovno-pravovoe regulirovanie i nekotorye ego granitsy v XXI veke [Criminal law regulation and some of its boundaries in the 21st century]. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya [International criminal law and international justice]. 2022;6:6‑8. (In Russ.).

15. Terskikh AI. Ugolovnyy zakon v realiyakh informatsionnogo obshchestva: novosti feykovye — nakazanie realnoe [Criminal law in the realities of the information society: Fake news — real punishment]. Zakonnost [Legality]. 2022;8:32-39. (In Russ.).

16. Khlebushkin AG. Perekhod na storonu protivnika i uchastie v voennykh deystviyakh na territorii inostrannogo gosudarstva v tselyakh, protivorechashchikh interesam Rossiyskoy Federatsii: voprosy kvalifikatsii [Going over to the enemy’s side and participating in military operations on the territory of a foreign state for purposes contrary to the interests of the Russian Federation: Questions of classification]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2022;12. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Lopashenko N.A. The Main Results of Criminal Law Reform in 2022: An Analytical Review. Lex Russica. 2023;76(4):115-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.197.4.115-135

Views: 1009


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)