Reduction of the Quality of Life as an Independent Kind of Non-Economic Losses in Case of Damage to Health

The paper is devoted to examination of the decline in the overall quality of life of a person who has suffered health damage as an independent kind of non-economic losses. The author defines doctrinal and regulatory prerequisites for the development of scientifically grounded criteria for its assessment and compensation in tort obligations. It has been established that, despite the use of the term «physical suffering» in Article 151 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, this element does not have reliable accounting methods when determining compensation for moral damage, largely due to the concentration of the appropriate method of civil rights protection on the act of unlawful behavior itself and the combination of the functions of conditional restoration of individually perceived losses and private sanctions. Taking into account significant foreign experience (Australia, Spain, Italy, USA, France, etc.), the author substantiates that consideration of adverse changes in the general parameters of the physical condition of the victim separately from the moral harm construction is predetermined by their role as a non-economic basis for the life of each person, resulting from a resource-oriented approach to the category of quality of life. The author proposes the method of calculating compensation for non-material damagebased on the principles of isolation of the assessment of physical conditions for temporary and persistent injuries, the complexity of factors of the impact of health damage on the overall quality of life of the injured person, the objectivity of the characteristics of the severity of pain. The scope of application of the construction of moral harm in legal relations under consideration is clarified, extending it to physical and moral suffering, developing from the accompanying intangible losses of «special value» (loss of the ability to enjoy professional activities and ordinary daily activities, loss of prospects for personal growth in sports and hobbies, etc.).

1. Bogdanov DE. Triedinaya sushchnost spravedlivosti v sfere deliktnoy otvetstvennosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [The triune essence of justice in the field of tort liability]. Journal of Russian Law. 2013;7:49-62. (In Russ.).

2. Budylin SL. Bol i stradaniya v stranakh obshchego prava. Preyskurant ili sudebnaya diskretsiya? [Pain and Suffering in Common Law Countries. Price List or Judicial Discretion?]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya RF. 2020;3:78-97. (In Russ.).

3. Guseva II, Zubkov VN. Novye podkhody k metodike opredeleniya razmera kompensatsii moralnogo vreda v svyazi s prichineniem vreda zdorovyu i zhizni grazhdan [New approaches to the method of determining the amount of compensation for moral harm in connection with harm to health and life of citizens]. Russian Justice. 2019;1:62-65. (In Russ.).

4. Guryleva ME, Zhuravleva MV, Aleeva GN. Kriterii kachestva zhizni v meditsine i kardiologii [Criteria of quality of life in medicine and cardiology]. Russian Medical Journal. 2006; 14(10):761-763. (In Russ.).

5. Dubko E. Institut kompensatsii moralnogo vreda v rossiyskom prave [Institute of compensation for moral damage in Russian law]. Zakonnost. 2012;1:49-62. (In Russ.).

6. Kashanin AV. Kompensatsiya moralnogo vreda za gibel (smert) voennosluzhashchikh po pravilam grazhdanskogo zakonodatelstva [Compensation for moral damage for the death (death) of servicemen according to the rules of civil legislation]. Citizen and Law. 2020;5:76-95. (In Russ.).

7. Yeremyan ZA, Shchelkova OYu. Istoriya stanovleniya i razvitiya kontseptsii kachestva zhizni v meditsine [The concept of quality of life in medicine]. Psychology. Psychophysiology. 2022: 15(1):37-49. (In Russ.).

8. Kozyreva EV, Novikova NV. K voprosu o sisteme kriteriev dlya opredeleniya razmera kompensatsii moralnogo vreda [To the question about the system of criteria for determining the size of moral harm compensation]. Vestnik Tver State University. Series «Law». 2021;4(68):29-33. (In Russ.).

9. Kumallagov ZU. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya kompensatsii moralnogo vreda [Problems of legal regulation of compensation for moral damage]. Citizen and Law. 2019;5:93-96. (In Russ.).

10. Morozov AM, Zhukov SV, Belyak MA, et al. O vozmozhnosti otsenivaniya bolevogo sindroma pri pomoshchi naibolee validizirovannykh shkal boli (obzor literatury) [About the possibilities of evaluating a pain syndrome using the most validized pain scales]. Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2020;27(2):62-65. (In Russ.).

11. Potemina TE, Kuznetsova SV, Pereshein AV, Samoylova OYu., Yanushanets OI. Kachestvo zhizni v zdravookhranenii: kriterii, tseli, perspektivy [Quality of life in healthcare services: criteria, goals, prospects]. Russian Osteopathic Journal. 2018;3(4):98-106. (In Russ.).

12. Samsonov RA. Aprobatsiya metoda kapitalizatsii dokhodnogo podkhoda k otsenke stoimosti kompensatsii vmenyaemogo moralnogo vreda [Approbation of the capitalization method of a profitable approach to assessing the cost of compensation for imputed moral harm]. Management of a Modern Organization: Experience, Problems and Prospects. 2022;15(1):53-63. (In Russ.).

13. Tarasevich KA. O nekotorykh voprosakh opredeleniya razmera kompensatsii moralnogo vreda [About some issues of determining the amount of compensation for moral damage]. Leningrad Law Journal. 2016;4(46):158-166. (In Russ.).

14. Trofimova GA. Moralnyy vred: sushchnost, osnovaniya vozniknoveniya i obem [The Moral Harm: Nature, Grounds of the Appearing and Volume]. Legislation and Economics. 2016;7:22-30. (In Russ.).

15. Erdelevsky AM. Kompensatsiya moralnogo vreda v Rossii i za rubezhom [Compensation for moral damage in Russia and abroad]. Moscow: Forum: Infra-M Publ.; 1997. (In Russ.).

16. Altwicker-Hámori S, Altwicker T, Peters A. Measuring violations of human rights: An empirical analysis of awards in respect of non-pecuniary damage under the European Convention on Human Rights. Heidelberg Journal of International Law (HJIL). 2016;76:1-51.

17. Bloechle C, Izbicki JR, Knoefel WT. et al. Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis — results after duodenumpreserving resection of the head of the pancreas. Pancreas. 11(1):77-85.

18. Goudkamp T. Damages for pain and suffering in the UK and Europe. Precedent. 2021;163:33-37.

19. Kratz R. The Question of the Constitutionality of Non-Economic Damage Caps in Personal Injury Cases in Canada. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review. 2019;50(1):195-235.

20. Boone KB (ed.).Neuropsychological Evaluation of Somatoform and Other Functional Somatic Conditions. New York: Routledge; 2017.

21. Rabin RL. Non-Pecuniary Damages in American Tort and Contract Law. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law. 2015;3(2):226-244.

22. Ware J, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:903-912.