Pecularities of Determining the Composition of the Gardener’s Personal Data as a Subject of Personal Data

The paper is devoted to the issue that is one of the most significant in law and that is subject to clarification in cases of protection of the subject of personal data — the composition of the claimant’s personal data determined during the court proceedings on the basis of judicial discretion. The purpose of the paper is to interpret the concept of personal data as a legal category and an integral part of the gardener’s right to privacy through the analysis of the concepts of the right to privacy and inviolability of private life in relation to the gardener, to formulate rules and principles for determining the composition of personal data of the gardener as a special subject of the institute of personal data. The author comes to the conclusion that the very fact of acquiring a garden plot of land intended for the recreation of individuals generates an absolute relationship in the form of a passive obligation of everyone to respect the privacy of the gardener, to refrain from any encroachment on this right, on the one hand, and the right of the gardener to demand from anyone and everyone its intangible benefits of an absolute nature acting erga omnes (against all), on the other hand. The above allows the author to conclude that, based on the peculiarities of the legal status of a gardener acting as the owner of a garden plot of land intended for recreation, it should be stated that all relations related to recreation are included in the concept of private life inviolability of which refers to intangible benefits that are absolute and protected also with the help of the institute of personal data.

1. Alenkin NE. O pravovoy prirode vnutrivedomstvennykh normativnykh dokumentov [On the legal nature of internal regulatory documents]. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law. 2022;2:100-123. (In Russ.).

2. Baglay MV. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation]. Moscow; 2005. (In Russ.).

3. Kuznetsov SA (ed.). Bolshoy tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka [The great explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. St. Petersburg; 2001. (In Russ.).

4. Burkova AYu. Opredelenie ponyatiya «personalnye dannye» [Definition of the concept of «personal data»]. Law and Economics. 2015;4:20-24. (In Russ.).

5. Dal VI. Tolkovyy slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: v 4 t. [Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language: in 4 vols]. Vol. 4. Moscow; 1978–1980. (In Russ.).

6. Lvova SV. Dachnye poselki: expresis verbis v zakone dlya sobstvennika iskhodnogo zemelnogo uchastka [Country villages: expresis verbis in the law for the owner of the original land plot]. Property Relations in the Russian Federation. 2023;2(257):65-74. (In Russ.).

7. Lvova SV. Negatsionnyy isk kak odin iz sposobov zashchity prav sobstvennika sadovogo zemelnogo uchastka [Negation claim as one of the ways to protect the rights of the owner of a garden land plot]. Property Relations in the Russian Federation. 2023;1(256):61-70. (In Russ.).

8. Maleina MN. Pravo na taynu i neprikosnovennost personalnykh dannykh [The right to secrecy and inviolability of personal data]. Journal of Russian Law. 2010;11:18-28. (In Russ.).

9. Naumov VB, Arkhipov VV. Ponyatie personalnykh dannykh: interpretatsiya v usloviyakh razvitiya informatsionno-telekommunikatsionnykh tekhnologiy [The concept of personal data: interpretation in the context of the development of information and telecommunication technologies]. Russian Juridical Journal. 2016;2:186-196. (In Russ.).

10. Tsechoev VK, Shvanderova AR. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik [Theory of state and law]. Moscow: Prometheus Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).

11. Shuraleva SV. Pravo na neprikosnovennost chastnoy zhizni v trudovom pravootnoshenii: teoreticheskie problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya [The Right To Privacy In Labor Relations: Theoretical Problems of Legal Regulation]. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022;3:527-551. (In Russ.).