Introduction of Censorship by Foreign Internet Platforms

Internet platforms have considerable power over information flows on a global scale in the conditions of mass digitalization of modern life. Currently, Internet platforms can control the ability of self-expression of billions of Internet users, including Russian ones. The concentration of the most popular platforms in the United States, where there is a vacuum of legal regulation of Internet platforms that enjoy legal protection as distributors of information along with the press and other types of media, has led to the fact that Internet platforms are actively creating a system of censorship of information, carefully masking such censorship and giving it the appearance of conscientious moderation aimed at combating extremism, false information, aggression, and other illegal phenomena. Censorship in its digital incarnation is fundamentally different from censorship that existed in the past. If earlier censorship used to be based on normative regulation and was regulated in detail, now it is hidden and it uses new technical opportunities. Being a product of the American political system, Internet platforms censorship is based on the political preferences of their leadership. Using historical and legal analysis, including analysis of the history of censorship since its appearance and transformation into the state institution, the author concludes that Internet platforms censorship represents a new phenomenon that has not been described in detail before, requiring reflection in legislation in order to ensure protection of the constitutional rights of users. Effective protection of the constitutional rights of Internet users is impossible without legislative prohibition of Internet platforms censorship and international cooperation aimed at combating this phenomenon.

1. Grashchenkov I. Tsenzura literaturnogo tvorchestva i pechati v SSSR (1929–1941 gg.) [Censorship of literary creativity and the press in the USSR (1929–1941)]. Vlast’. 2008;6:85-88. (In Russ.).

2. Diskin EI. Ilon Mask i krestovyy pokhod protiv tsenzury [Elon Musk and the crusade against censorship]. Zakon. 2023;1:106-109. (In Russ.).

3. Zelenov MV. K istorii pravovogo polozheniya tsenzury v SSSR: Razrabotka Polozheniya o Glavnom upravlenii po okhrane voennykh i gosudarstvennykh tayn v pechati pri SM SSSR (Glavlite) v 1953–1958 gg [The History of the legal status of censorship in the USSR: The Development of Regulations on the Main Directorate for the Protection of Military and State Secrets in the Press under the USSR Council of Ministers (Glavlit) in 1953– 1958]. In: Evolution of the Russian and Foreign State and Law. To the 80th anniversary of the Department of History of State and Law of the Ural State Law University (1936–2016): Collection of Research Papers. Vol. III: The evolution of the Russian state and law, the teachings of the Russian state and law in the works-congratulations of colleagues. Yekaterinburg; 2016. (In Russ.).

4. Prisyazhnyuk YuP. Tsenzurnoe zakonodatelstvo v dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii (k voprosu ob istokakh avtorskogo prava) [Censorship legislation in pre-revolutionary Russia (on the question of the origins of copyright)]. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2022;1:142-153. (In Russ.).

5. Reifman PS. Tsenzura v dorevolyutsionnoy, sovetskoy i postsovetskoy Rossii: v 2 t. [Censorship in pre-revolutionary, Soviet and post-Soviet Russia: in 2 vols.]. Vol. 1. Issue 1. Superfin GG, editor. Moscow: Probel Publ.; 2000, 2014. (In Russ.).

6. Shchebalsky PK. Istoricheskie svedeniya o tsenzure v Rossii [Historical information about censorship in Russia]. St. Petersburg; 1862. (In Russ.).

7. Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007;13(1):211-213. (In Russ.).

8. Dutta D. Twitter Files 2.0: Arbitrary blacklisting, deliberate reduction in tweet visibility of right-wing accounts exposed in internal communications. Available at: https://www.opindia.com/2022/12/twitter-files-2-0-arbitrary-blacklisting-deliberate-reduction-in-tweet-visibility-of-right-wing-accounts-exposed/ [Accessed: 23.03.2023].

9. Facebook, Twitter chiefs face lawmakers amid security, censoring concerns. Available at: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-twitter-chiefs-defend-sites-on-capitol-hill-amid-election-security-concerns-live-updates/ [Accessed: 23.03.2023].

10. Macwhirter I. Why we should take the Twitter Files seriously. Available at: https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-we-should-take-the-twitter-files-seriously [Accessed: 23.03.2023].

11. Manjoo F. Silicon Valley Reels After Trump’s Election. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/technology/trump-election-silicon-valley-reels.html [Accessed: 23.03.2023].

12. McCormick R. Donald Trump says Facebook and Twitter ‘helped him win. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2016/11/13/13619148/trump-facebook-twitter-helped-win [Accessed: 23.03.2023].

13. Pichai S. Let’s not let fear defeat our values. Available at: https://medium.com/@sundar_pichai/let-s-not-let-fear-defeat-our-values-af2e5ca92371#.dw3v41tjy [Accessed: 23.03.2023].

14. Shah S. The history of social networking. Available at: https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/the-history-of-social-networking/ [Accessed: 23.03.2023].

15. Stahl JM. CDA is DOA: zoning the information superhighway to exclude adult motels and community service organisations. Entertainment Law Review. 1997;8(5).

16. Transcript of Mark Zuckerberg’s Senate hearing. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/04/10/transcript-of-mark-zuckerbergs-senate-hearing/ [Accessed: 23.03.2023].

17. Why Vijaya Gadde and other ex-Twitter executives are being grilled by American lawmakers. Available at: https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-global/vijaya-gadde-grilled-8436990/ [Accessed: 23.03.2023].