Communicative Constitutionalism, Constitutional Involvement and Citizenship in the Public Legal Space of Algorithmic and Information Society
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.204.11.041-056
Abstract
The paper dwells on theoretical foundations and methodological significance of communicative constitutionalism, provides an academic basis for constitutional communication in the public legal space, shows the problems of constitutional law nature arising in the information society. Communicative constitutionalism and digital citizenship are considered as hybrid institutions in the field of public law and information space. The author draws attention to the nature and significance of the institute of public participation or the institute of public participation in the public law area, various forms of its manifestation, notes the process of institutionalization of constitutional law as the law of society and public interests based on the research of domestic and foreign scholars The paper explains the public law nature of communicative constitutionalism, the complex nature and transformation of citizenship as a public law and as an information-digital entity. As a conclusion, it is noted that there is a fragmentation and dispersion of legal regulation and institutional design of institutions of public initiatives, public discussions and the identification of public opinion concerning publicly significant issues, draft regulatory legal acts, and constitutional amendments. There is no institution of scientific expertise guaranteed by constitutional legislation along with public discussion.
In the order of legal scientific initiatives the author proposes to: 1) incorporate into the legislation the principle of scientific federalism and public participation in the development of draft amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the draft of a new Constitution; 2) consolidate at the legislative or constitutional law level the obligation of subjects of the initiative to revise the Constitution and constitutional amendments to send draft amendments submitted to the State Duma, to the leading universities of the country, research institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences in order to conduct discussions and adopt conclusions; 3) create legislative guarantees to attract citizens through Internet technologies to discuss the content of amendments to the Constitution, the draft of a new Constitution, including the right to propose revisions of certain norms
Keywords
About the Author
I. A. KravetsRussian Federation
Igor A. Kravets, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Acting Head of the Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law, Head of the Department of Theory and History of the State and Law, Constitutional Law
2, Pirogova St., Novosibirsk 630090
References
1. Antonov MV, Polyakov AV, Chestnov IL. The communicative approach and the Russian theory of law. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. 2013;6(311):78-95. (In Russ.).
2. Avakyan SA. On the role of constitutional law in the context of new challenges and conceptual solutions for Russia’s political future. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law. 2023;1:3-21. (In Russ.).
3. Avakyan SA. Russia: citizenship, foreigners, external migration. St. Petersburg: Jurid. Center-Press; 2003. (In Russ.).
4. Avakyan SA. The information space of knowledge, digital world and constitutional law. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2019;7:23-28. (In Russ.).
5. Avakyan SA. The main trends in the modern development of constitutional law. In: Avakyan SA (ed.). Constitutional law: results of development, problems and prospects: Collection of Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Moscow: RG-Press Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
6. Bachilo IL, Lapina MA (eds.). Actual problems of IT law. 2nd ed. Moscow: Justicia Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).
7. Chirkin VE. The Constitution: the Russian model. Moscow: Jurist Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.).
8. Drobot SE. Communicative opportunities for political participation in the constitutional modernization mechanism: retrospective aspects and improvement prospects. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2023;5:21-26. (In Russ.).
9. Drobot SE. Decree law in the mechanism of constitutional modernization. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika. 2023;19(2):55. (In Russ.).
10. Gladkova TS. The mechanism of enforcement of constitutional rights in the Russian Federation in the conditions of the transition to the digital economy. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2023;1:60-63. (In Russ.).
11. Habermas Yu. Theory of communicative action (fragments). Voprosy sotsialnoy teorii. 2007;1(1):229-245. (In Russ.).
12. Habermas Yu. Theory of communicative activity. Trans. from Germ. (Habermas, Jürgen. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns). Moscow: Ves mir Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).
13. Khabrieva TYa, Klishas AA. Thematic commentary to the Law of the Russian Federation on the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation dated March 14, 2020 No. 1-FKZ «On Improving the regulation of certain issues of the Organization and functioning of public Power». Moscow: Norma; Infra-M Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).
14. Komarova VV. The constituent power and the forms of its implementation. Sovremennoe obshchestvo i pravo. 2011;1:13-19. (In Russ.).
15. Kravets IA. Constitutional Revolutions in Historical and Modern Jurisprudence: legal and methodological aspects. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2023;5:6-14. (In Russ.).
16. Kravets IA. Digital citizenship and constitutional challenges in the Information and algorithmic society. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2023;2(153):93-123. (In Russ.).
17. Kravets IA. Digital Constitutionalism: methodological and legal aspects. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2022;1:19-33. (In Russ.).
18. Kravets IA. Informational and digital constitutionalism and constitutional public initiatives in conditions of the Russian legal framework. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2020;9:9-15. (In Russ.).
19. Kruss VI. Constitutional legal use and legal responsibility. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2007;6:13-20. (In Russ.).
20. Kruss VI. Theory of constitutional legal use. Moscow: Norma publ.; 2007. (In Russ.).
21. Kutafin OE. Russian citizenship. Moscow: Jurist Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).
22. Medushevsky AN. Law and new technologies: parameters of Internet regulation (Runet). Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2006;1:106-113. (In Russ.).
23. Medushevsky AN. The Constitution of the Internet: idea, projects and prospects. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. 2019;1:71-86. (In Russ.).
24. Nevinskiy VV. Human ‘Digital Rights’: The Essence, System, Meaning. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2019;10:26-32. (In Russ.).
25. Nevinskiy VV. The subject of Russian constitutional (state) Law in the value dimension of the Correlation of the interests of the Individual, society and the State of the Soviet and post-Soviet periods. In: Avakyan SA (ed.). Constitutional law: results of development, problems and prospects: Collection of Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Moscow: RG-Press Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
26. Ovsepyan ZhI. Citizenship in Russia (general theoretical, historical and constitutional-legal research). 2nd ed. Rostov-on-Don: SFU Publishing House; 2010. (In Russ.).
27. Polyakov AV. The communicative concept of law (genesis and theoretical and legal justification). Dr. Diss. (Law). St. Petersburg; 2002. (In Russ.).
28. Ponkin IV. The concept of machine-readable law. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2021;15:231-236. (In Russ.).
29. Razdyakonova EV. Deliberative participation in constitutional development of Russia: theoretical aspects and historical retrospect. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2023;5:15-20. (In Russ.).
30. Shakhray SM. Digital Constitution. Fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual in a total information society. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2018;88(12):1075-1082. (In Russ.).
31. Truntsevskiy YuV. Law as code and precision law from a datification perspective. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2021;17(1):49-67. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2021.008
32. Van Hook M. Law as communication. Translated from English by M. V. Antonova and A.V. Polyakov. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University, University Publishing Consortium; 2012. (In Russ.).
33. Verbilovich O. Theory of communicative action: key categories and cognitive potential. In: YarskayaSmirnova ER, Romanova PV. Public sphere: theory, methodology, case study. Moscow: Variant: TsPGI Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kravets I.A. Communicative Constitutionalism, Constitutional Involvement and Citizenship in the Public Legal Space of Algorithmic and Information Society. Lex Russica. 2023;76(11):41–56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.204.11.041-056