The Concept of Level Organization of Scientific Knowledge as a Tool for Systematization of Conceptual and Categorical Apparatus of Jurisprudence

Legal concepts (categories) cannot exist separately from each other, since they are present within the framework of a certain system that strives for orderliness. To systematize the conceptual and categorical apparatus various approaches are used, which, although they do not exclude each other, but weakly correlate with each other. The existence of «once and for all given» systems of ordering the conceptual and categorical apparatus of jurisprudence does not meet the needs of legal science and practice. The conceptual and categorical matrix of jurisprudence should be based on flexible approaches that take into account the peculiarities of the level of scientific knowledge used, the contextuality of the analyzed phenomenon, etc. To solve such problems, the concept of the level organization of scientific knowledge is optimal, according to which in every developed science there are several levels of scientific knowledge: empirical, theoretical and metatheoretical. The specification of the structural and substantive elements used at these levels in relation to jurisprudence should become one of the tasks of the theory of law. The level-based organization of scientific cognition makes it possible to systematize the conceptual and categorical apparatus of jurisprudence, taking into account the specifics of its use at different levels of cognitive activity, is optimal for studying the mechanism of interrelation of legal categories. The tiered approach to the cognition of the legal reality phenomena must be supplemented with elements on which inter-level relationships are carried out — the «boundaries of meanings» between the empirical and theoretical levels, as well as between the theoretical and metatheoretical levels. The disciplinary matrix of legal science has a complex multilevel structure, within which legal categories change their functionality depending on the level of scientific knowledge used. At the empirical level, the conceptual and categorical apparatus is applied, at the theoretical level it is developed, verified and updated using the metatheoretical level. The system of the conceptual and categorical apparatus of jurisprudence includes, among other things, elements that give an idea of the links and connections in the logical structure of an object (cognizable) phenomenon, reflecting its primary basis and essential dominants — legal metaphenomena. Their allocation is based on the use of the concept of the level organization of scientific knowledge.

1. Alekseev PV, Panin AV. Philosophy: A textbook. Moscow: TK Velbi, Prospekt Publ.; 2005. (In Russ.).

2. Alekseev SS. Law: The ABC — theory — philosophy: The experience of complex research. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 1999. (In Russ.).

3. Avtonomov AS. Systemicity of categories of constitutional law. Dr. Diss. (Law). Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.).

4. Barinov PS. Depreciation of legal categories. Cand. Diss. (Law). Saratov; 2019. (In Russ.).

5. Baytin MI. The essence of law (Modern normative legal understanding on the verge of two centuries). Moscow: Pravo i gosudarstvo Publ.; 2005. (In Russ.).

6. Cherdantsev AF. Logical-linguistic phenomena in jurisprudence: A monograph. Moscow: Norma, Infra-M Publ.; 2012. (In Russ.).

7. Cherdantsev AF. Theory of state and law: A textbook for universities. Moscow: Yurayt Publ.; 2001. (In Russ.).

8. Derkach TV. Private and public law as paired legal categories. The Author’s abstract of Cand. Diss. (Law). Saratov; 2011. (In Russ.).

9. Gadzhiev GA. Ontology of law: (critical understanding of the legal concept of reality). A monograph. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.).

10. Gubaeva TV. Language and law. The art of word mastery in professional legal activity. Moscow: Norma Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).

11. Khabrieva TYa, Nudel SL. Scientific approaches to the problem of criminal responsibility of legal entities (review of the monograph by Professor A.V. Fedorov «Criminal responsibility of legal entities in post-Soviet states» (Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2022. 248 p.)). Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2022;26(10):143-149. (In Russ.).

12. Khabrieva TYa. Cyclical normative arrays in law. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2019;12:518. (In Russ.).

13. Kovalenko ON. Conceptual series of the category «functions of criminal law». In: Socio-economic, liberal arts and jurisprudence: Questions of theory and practice. Proceedings of III International Scientific and Practical Conference (Novosibirsk, February 2–14, 2018). Novosibirsk: Tsentr razvitiya nauchnogo sotrudnichestva Publ.; 2018. Pp. 101–108. (In Russ.).

14. Krasheninnikov PV. Passions in Law: Essays on the Law of War Communism and Soviet Law. 1917–1938. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).

15. Kuryshev EYu. Traditions and innovations as paired legal categories. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2016;2(109):153-157. (In Russ.).

16. Lapinsky DA, Musatkina AA. Alternative and non-alternative sanctions as paired legal categories. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2017;12:71-81. (In Russ.).

17. Lebedev SA. Scientific method: History and theory. A monograph. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).

18. Leist OE. Essence of the law. Problems of theory and philosophy of law. Moscow: Zertsalo-M Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.)

19. Lesovaya TS. Concretization of law and certainty of law as paired legal categories. Cand. Diss. (Law). Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).

20. Malko AV. Incentives and restrictions as paired legal categories. Pravovedenie; 1995;1:3-13. (In Russ.).

21. Mamchun VV. Criteria for risk classification in legal activity. In: Criteria in law: theory, practice, technique. Collected papers based on the materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (N. Novgorod, May 24–25, 2018) Tolstik VA, Vasiliev PV, editors. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation; 2012. Pp. 245–252. (In Russ.).

22. Nyrkov VV. Encouragement and punishment as paired legal categories. Cand. Diss. (Law). Saratov; 2003. (In Russ.).

23. Ozhegov SI. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Skvortsova LI, editor. Moscow: Onyks: Mir i obrazovanie Publ.; 2009. (In Russ.).

24. Pakharukov AA. The structure of scientific knowledge: Empirical and theoretical levels (on the example of legal science). Kultura. Nauka. Obrazovanie. 2019;3(52):23-57. (In Russ.).

25. Panchenko VYu. Legal resistance and legal assistance as paired legal categories. Lex russica. 2015;12:30-42. (In Russ.).

26. Perevalov VD. Legal doctrine: Problems of formation and implementation. A monograph. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).

27. Polyakova TA, Minbaleev AV, Krotkova NV. The main trends and problems of the development of the science of information law. Gosudarstvo i Pravo [State and Law]. 2022;9:94-104. (In Russ.).

28. Przhilenskiy VI. History and Philosophy of Science: A textbook for graduate students. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).

29. Radko TN. Theory of State and law. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.).

30. Rozov MA. Theory of knowledge as an empirical science. In: Lektorskiy VA, editor. Epistemology: Prospects for development. Moscow: Kanon+, Reabilitatsiya Publ.; 2012. Pp. 90–123. (In Russ.).

31. Rudakov AA. Rights and obligations as paired legal categories. Cand. Diss. (Law). Krasnoyarsk; 2007. (In Russ.).

32. Shakhanov VV. «Horizontal» and «vertical» structuring of elements of the legal system as a reflection of its metaphenomenality (on the issue of conceptual series of legal categories). Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn. 2019;2:114-119. (In Russ.).

33. Shakhanov VV. Metaphenomena in law: Purpose, selection criteria, risks of use. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2019;12:30-37. (In Russ.).

34. Shakhanov VV. Metaphenomena in Law: the Structure, Elements, Methodological Aspects, Optimization of Interaction between Theoretical and Meta-Theoretical Levels. Lex russica. 2021;74(1):57-66. (In Russ.).

35. Svinin EV. Object and Subject of Legal Regulation as Components of the Structural Organization of Law and Order. Lex Russica. 2020;73(1):118-131. (In Russ.).

36. Syrykh VM. History and methodology of legal science. A textbook on Master’s degree programs. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.).

37. Tikhomirov YuA, Golovina AA, Plyugina IV, et al. Legal space: Boundaries and dynamics. A monograph. Tikhomirov YuA, editor. Moscow: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation: Infra-M Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).

38. Ushakov AA. Essays on Soviet legislative stylistics: A study guide. Perm: Perm University Publ.; 1967. (In Russ.).

39. Vasiliev AM. Legal categories: Methodological aspects of the development of a system of categories of the theory of law: A monograph. Repr. ed. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M Publ.; 2021. (In Russ.).

40. Vedeneev YuA. Jurisprudence: Phenomenon and concept. Introduction to the genealogy of the language of conceptual paradigms: A monograph. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).

41. Vlasenko NA. Language of Law. Irkutsk: Vostochno-Sibirskoe knizhnoe izdatelstvo; 1997. (In Russ.).

42. Zhukov VN. The State. Law. Power: Philosophy and Sociology. Moscow: Mir filosofii Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.).