Freedom of Labor in the context of Constitutionalization of Social and Labor Relations: History and Current State
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.207.2.049-059
Abstract
Constitutionalization of social and labor relations represents a manifestation of the general process of involving into the scope of constitutional law such areas of public life that are traditionally included in the subject matter of special branches of law. The reasons for the constitutionalization of these relations lie in the change in the vector of state social policy, which is gradually moving away from liberal individualist principles and strives to ensure social justice in society. The practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation can be deemed to be an external manifestation of the changed vector. The Constitutional Court in the last few years has given a deeper meaning to constitutional provisions in the field of labor, and the decisions taken reflect the connection between freedom of work and the principle of the welfare state and the novelties of the Constitution — Part 5 of Article 75 and Article 75.1. Provisions of the social and labor nature were included in all constitutions of the Soviet period, just as they are present in most constitutions of foreign countries, where they primarily act as principles of the state, and only secondarily as subjective rights and freedoms. It is concluded that the status and semantic content of these provisions in the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 1993 did not initially correspond to their social and legal significance. Freedom of labor was understood in a liberal way and was associated with the right of a citizen to choose a type of activity and profession. The 2020 amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation supplemented the content of the constitutional value of freedom of labor, emphasized its status as an element of the social state, linked it with such concepts as respect for labor and the person of labor, social solidarity, decent human development, which is reflected in the latest decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. There are grounds to assert that the subject of constitutional law has changed due to the constitutionalization of social and labor relations, on which constitutional law exerts its influence in the context of interaction between an individual, society and the state.
About the Author
M. S. SagandykovRussian Federation
Mikhail S. Sagandykov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Theory of the State and Law and Labor Law
Chelyabinsk
References
1. Abramova MO. Transformation of the concept of human rights in liberal concepts. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2015;2(30):75-82. (In Russ.).
2. Alabastrova IA. Social Rights: cOnstitutional Promises, Wishes or Ghosts? State and Law. 2010;4:30-38. (In Russ.).
3. Astafichev PA. Priorities of the development of human and civil constitutional socioeconomic rights in the USSR and modern Russia. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2021;8:7-13. (In Russ.).
4. Astafichev PA. Socio-economic human rights in soviet and Post-Soviet Russia: the experience of a comparative study. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2021;2(90):21-26. (In Russ.).
5. Bondar N. The Constitution is the value-legal basis for resolving social contradictions (in the context of the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation). Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review. 2008;2(63):46-58. (In Russ.).
6. Geikhman VL. The Constitution of the Russian Federation and the right to labor. Labor Law in Russia and Abroad. 2019;1:5-7. (In Russ.).
7. Barabashev GV, Vasilenkov PT, Zlatopolskiy DL, et al. Kravchuk SS (ed.). State law of the USSR. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ.; 1967. (In Russ.).
8. Kanakova AE. Freedom of labor and the right to work in the Constitution of the Russian Federation: the content and balance between constitutional categories. Altayskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik = Altai Legal Bulletin. 2016;2(14):29-33. (In Russ.).
9. Kolotova NV. Constitutionalization of social rights as a modern law development tendency. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2019;1:5-9. (In Russ.).
10. Krasnoslobodtseva NK. The relationship between the concepts of «freedom» and «human rights». Leningrad Law Journal. 2014;4(38):75-82. (In Russ.).
11. Kruss VI. Doctrinal innovations in the context of the Constitutionalization of the Russian legal system. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2013;4:2-11. (In Russ.).
12. Malitskiy AL. Soviet State Law (essays). Kharkiv: Yurizdat NKYu of the Ukrainian SSR; 1926.
13. Mikhailovskaya I. Constitutional Consolidation of Individual Rights and Freedoms: An Outside View. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: Vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie = Constitutional Law: The Eastern European Review. 1998;2(23):35-38. (In Russ.).
14. Nevinskiy VV. Natural human rights on the balance of modern constitutionalism. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2016;8:28-33. (In Russ.).
15. Nevinskiy VV, Kanakova AE. Freedom of labor and the right to work in constitutions of foreign countries (comparative and legal analysis). Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research. 2015;1(2):97103. (In Russ.).
16. Opaleva AA. Individual rights and freedoms in the context of constitutional changes. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2022;3:199-202. (In Russ.).
17. Osavelyuk AM. Evolution of a subject of branch of a constitutional law. Magistrate Judge. 2014;1:9-15. (In Russ.).
18. Lukasheva EA (ed.). Human rights. 3rd ed. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).
19. Pratsko GS, Yatsenko OV. Western liberalism and its structural characteristics. In: Modernization of Russian society and education: New economic guidelines, management strategies, law enforcement and training issues: Proceedings of the 22nd National Scientific Conference (with international participation), Taganrog, April 17, 2021 Taganrog: Publishing House of Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics; 2021. (In Russ.).
20. Pfersmann O. The importance of social principles in comparative constitutional law. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: Vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie = Constitutional Law: The Eastern European Review. 2003;1(42):45-51. (In Russ.).
21. Sagandykov MS. The legal nature of social and labor rights in the Constitutions of Russia and foreign countries. Russian Yearbook of Labor Law. 2011;6:247-251. (In Russ.).
22. Titova EV. The constitutional law concept of interaction between the State and an individual. Lex russica. 2018;11:69-82. (In Russ.).
23. Hayek FA. The Constitution of Freedom. Tr. from Eng. Moscow: New Publishing House; 2018. (In Russ.).
24. Khudoley DM. Constitutionalization of the right to work in foreign countries. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2010;1(7):168-170. (In Russ.).
25. Shayo A. How the rule of law ruined social protection reform in Hungary. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: Vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie = Constitutional Law: The Eastern European Review. 1996;2(15):2-11. (In Russ.).
26. Shulzhenko YuL. Textbook of Soviet State Law edited by A. Ya. Vyshinsky 1938. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022;17(1):77-99. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Sagandykov M.S. Freedom of Labor in the context of Constitutionalization of Social and Labor Relations: History and Current State. Lex Russica. 2024;77(2):49–59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.207.2.049-059