Procurement Disputes Arbitration: Main Problems at the Present Stage

The relevance of the paper is predetermined by the study of the key problems of arbitration in the context of the specifics of public procurement at the present stage, namely, the problem of determining the appropriate criteria for the conclusion and validity of arbitration agreements. The purpose of the study is to critically evaluate the so-called non-arbitrability formula, established in contemporary court practice; to disclose the algorithm for the emergence of contractual relations as a result of competitive procurement procedures; to substantiate the legal force of arbitration clauses incorporated into contracts before arbitration rules are deposited by the arbitration institution. The author sees the objectives of the study in substantiating the fundamentally permissible arbitrability of contractual disputes in all segments of procurement relations (not only by direct order under the federal law, but also for the future, including contractual disputes in the field of state defense orders due to the variety of available transactions); in identifying factors contributing to the proper assessment of an arbitration agreement for its validity. Methodologically, the paper is based on a set of general scientific (analysis, modeling, analogy, hypothesis), private scientific (formal logical, systemic, functional) methods, and uses the formal legal method. The results of the study allowed the author to draw conclusions about sufficiency of existing legislative regulation for assessing the conclusion and validity of arbitration agreements included in draft contracts at the stage of competitive procurement procedure; about the lack of grounds for evaluating these agreements for their compliance with the principles of procurement; about
the legal force of dormant arbitration clauses necessary for business turnover in the short term. The author suggests directions for improving law enforcement practice aimed at curbing abuses in terms of challenging arbitration agreements on the grounds of their non-conclusion and (or) invalidity.

1. Belyaeva OA, Gabov AV. Arbitrability of disputes arising in the field of procurement. Journal of Russian Law. 2017;5:46-55. (In Russ.).

2. Belyaeva OA, Kabytov PP, Kuznetsov VI. Legal Regulation of the State Defense Order: Civil and Administrative Aspects. Journal of Russian Law. 2019;9:60-72. (In Russ.).

3. Belyaeva OA. Theoretical and legal foundations of procurement contracts in contemporary Russian legal order. In: Andreev NYu, Arzumanova LL, Belykh VS. Vaipan VA, Egorova MA (eds.). Modern problems of the development of entrepreneurial and corporate law in Russia and abroad. Moscow: Yustitsinform Publ.; 2021. (In Russ.).

4. Belyaeva OA. Arbitration clause in contracts concluded based results of tenders and other competitive procedures. In: Azarova EG, Ayurova AA, Belobabchenko MK. Gabov AV (ed.). Law and Economic Activities: Modern Challenges. Moscow; 2015. (In Russ.).

5. Belyaeva OA. Civil law aspects of relations under the state defense order. In: Ideas and traditions of Russian civil law: Fontiers of epochs and new horizons. Proceedings of the 17th Scientific Readings in memory of Professor S. N. Bratus. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

6. Belyaeva OA. Army and Navy supply: civil aspects. Pravo v Vooruzhennykh Silakh — Voenno-pravovoe obozrenie [Law in the Armed Forces — Military Law Review]. 2021;12. (In Russ.).

7. Belyaeva OA. The regime of public procurement: ways of legal identification. Problems and challenges of the digital society: trends in the development of legal regulation of digital transformations: A collection of research papers based on the proceedings of the I International Scientific and Practical Conference, Saratov, October 17–18, 2019. Saratov: Saratov State Law Academy; 2019. (In Russ.).

8. Eremin VV. The Concept of Accumulation (Concentration) of Socially Significant Public Elements in Legal Relation as a Basis for Non-Arbitrability of a Dispute. Herald of Civil Procedure. 2021;3:191-211. (In Russ.).

9. Ivanova EV. Legal reform of military arbitration proceedings. Vestnik voennogo prava. 2018;1. (In Russ.).

10. Khabrieva TYa. The doctrinal significance of the Russian Constitution. Journal of Russian Law. 2009;2. (In Russ.).

11. Lazarev VV. On Limited Interpretation of the law: classics, modern and postmodern. Journal of Russian Law. 2016;8:15-28. (In Russ.).

12. Lazarev VV. On the role of the court in the formation of legal doctrines. Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost [Legal science: history and modernity]. 2022;11. (In Russ.).

13. Mikhashin AV. Civil law regulation of procurement under the state defense order. Moscow: Yustitsinform Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).

14. Osmanova DO. A Doctrine as a Source of Civil Law. Economy and Law. 2023;12:3-20. (In Russ.).

15. Sevastyanov GV. Validity of the Arbitration Agreement in view of the Objective Impartiality of the Arbitration Court Conception and Statutory Provisions on Purchase. The Arbitration Court. 2022;2/3:10-15. (In Russ.).

16. Shitkina IS, Guryanov AV. Arbitration Proceedings as an Effective Method to Resolve Disputes: Current Issues. Vestnik Arbitrazhnoy Praktiki. 2023;2:3-13. (In Russ.).