Unjustified Enrichment as a result of Turnover of Objects of Information Law
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.210.5.060-072
Abstract
Not being an object of civil rights (Article 128 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation), information has acquired objective marketability that does not limit itself, due to its value for certain persons, to using the construction of a contract for the provision of paid services for the legal regulation of emerging legal relations. The paper examines the legal nature of information and its historical and modern regulation, examines cases of illegal access to information and its use for the benefit of an unscrupulous person and suggests the possibility of applying the institute of unjustified enrichment by analogy. It is proved that the use of actio de in rem verso as an institution of unfair enrichment is the most appropriate for regulating the legal relationship under study. It is proposed to use the named institution up to the proposed reform of civil legislation in order to give information the properties of a full-fledged object of civil rights. It is argued that the reform of civil legislation regarding the inclusion of information in the objects of civil rights is long overdue and is predetermined by the objective development of the information society. Moreover, the expansion of digitalization and digital transformation of participants in civil law relations, including the state, leaves no doubt that such changes are relevant, and the courts, as soon as such an opportunity arises, need to begin applying new legislation in this regard.
About the Author
A. A. PavlovRussian Federation
Andrey A. Pavlov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Lecturer, School of Law
References
1. Andreev YuN. The mechanism of civil law protection. Moscow: Norma, Infra‑M Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.).
2. Bachilo IL, Lopatin VN, Fedotov MA. Topornin BN (ed.). Information Law. St. Petersburg; 2001. (In Russ.).
3. Bachilo IL. Information Law. Moscow: Yurait Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).
4. Baturin YuM. Problems of Computer Law. Moscow: Yurid. lit.; 1991. (In Russ.).
5. Belov VA (ed.). Civil law. Actual problems of theory and practice. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Doctrinal and Practical Commentary. Yurait Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.).
6. Erokhina MA. Why was the article by Francesco Giglio, Professor of the University of Manchester about «unfair» and «unjustified» enrichment translated into Russian? Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2016;12:154-157. (In Russ.).
7. Fedotov MA, et al. Information Law. Moscow: Yurait Publ.; 2024. (In Russ.).
8. Giglio F. A systematic approach to «unfair» and «unjustified» enrichment. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2016;12:158-189. (In Russ.).
9. Gorodov OA. Information Law. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).
10. Kopylov VA. Information Law. Moscow: Jurist Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.).
11. Lapin VI, Lapina MA, Revin AG. Kilyaskhanov ISh (ed.). Information Law. Moscow: Zakon i pravo, Unity-Dana Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).
12. Minbaleev AV. Characteristics of the method of legal regulation (on the example of the method of information law). Bulletin of SUSU. The series «Law». 2013;13(2):91-94. (In Russ.).
13. Novak DV. Unjustified enrichment in civil law. Moscow: Statute Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.).
14. Sitdikova LB. Information as a legal and civil category: the status of information in civil law. Civil Law. 2007;2:41- 47. (In Russ.).
15. Sitdikova LB. Information as an intangible benefit. Yurist. 2007;8:62-64. (In Russ.).
16. Starovoitova A S. Restoration of corporate control as a way to protect the rights of participants of legal entities. Currier of the Kutafin University (MSAL). 2019;2:155-163. (In Russ.).
17. Starovoitova AS. Recognition of law as a way to protect civil rights: Problems of theory and practice. Cand. Diss. (Law). Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).
18. Tikhomirov YuA. Public Law. Moscow: Beck Publ.; 1995. (In Russ.).
19. Tolstoy VS. Civil Information Law. Moscow: Publishing house of APK and PPRO; 2009. (In Russ.).
20. Vengerov AB. Law and information in the context of control automation (theoretical issues). Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ.; 1978. (In Russ.).
21. Works on intellectual property. 2000. Vol. 2. Available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2021/02/28/1395782402/2.tis-1999_2.pdf (Accessed 02.04.2024). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Pavlov A.A. Unjustified Enrichment as a result of Turnover of Objects of Information Law. Lex Russica. 2024;77(5):60-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.210.5.060-072