Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

The Significance of Judicial Practice in the Legal System of Russia: A Сritical Analysis of Judicial Acts in Corporate Disputes

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.221.4.009-024

Abstract

The author considers the significance of judicial practice in the legal system of Russia. Despite the fact that Russia belongs to the countries of the continental legal family, where only normative legal acts are recognized as sources of law and the precedent in the sense that is given to it in common law countries is not a source of law, judicial practice in the form of legal standings of superior courts should actually be recognized as a quasisource of Russian law. The author analyzes some rulings of the Supreme Court in corporate disputes, identifying contradictions in their standings to legislation or judicial practice. Using examples of specific corporate disputes, the author considers the possibility and conditions for applying the law by analogy, namely, the existence of a gap in the regulation of similar relations. With regard to the interpretation of the rule of law by the courts, it is emphasized that it is inadmissible to use the method of interpretation that violates the principles of law and its fundamental ideas. The author wonders whether the courts in individual judicial acts can deviate from the established legal standings and assess business decisions. In the author’s opinion, it is quite obvious that the uniformity of judicial practice is the most important element of the principle of legal certainty, a guarantee of the stability of relations regulated under civil law.

About the Author

I. S. Shitkina
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Irina S. Shitkina, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Business Law

Moscow



References

1. Alekseev SS. General Theory of Law. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ.; 1981. (In Russ.).

2. Berle A. The Theory of Enterprise Entity. Columbia Law Review. 1947;47.

3. Chunina MS. Judicial Rulemaking and Judicial Lawmaking: Differentiation of Concepts. Science. Society. State. 2022;10:2. (In Russ.).

4. Filippova SYu, Shitkina IS. The Fate of Shares Held by a Shareholder who has Lost Legal Capacity. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya. 2023;2:4-19. (In Russ.).

5. Gorbashev IV. Features of insolvency (bankruptcy) of corporate groups based on material consolidation: Comparative Legal Study. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Yekaterinburg; 2022. (In Russ.).

6. Guk PA. Judicial Lawmaking: Questions of Theory and Practice. Lex Russica. 2016;(7):14-27. (In Russ.).

7. Guryanov AV. Legal regulation of corporate control and management relations in holdings. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow; 2024. (In Russ.).

8. Karapetov AG. Borba za priznanie sudebnogo pravotvorchestva v evropeyskom i amerikanskom prave [The struggle for recognition of judicial law-making in European and American law]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2011. (In Russ.).

9. Lomakin DV. The Impact of an External Political Factor on the Law Enforcement Development. Lex Russica. 2025;78(1):20-37. (In Russ.).

10. Sarbash SV. Corporate Control Restoration. Herald of Civil Law. 2008;8(4):70-79. (In Russ.).

11. Shershenevich GS. Selected Works. In 6 vols. Vol. 4. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

12. Shitkina IS, Kopylov DG. Reverse Piercing of the Corporate Veil. Zakonodatelstvo. 2020;3:7-17. (In Russ.).

13. Shitkina IS, Muzafarov EE, Naymushina BA, Seveeva KV. Corporate law issues in positions of the constitutional court of the russian federation. Law and Business. 2022;3:3-28. (In Russ.).

14. Shitkina IS. O priznanii sudebnoy praktiki istochnikom rossiyskogo prava [On the recognition of judicial practice as a source of Russian law]. Economy and Law. 2013;4:73-77. (In Russ.).

15. Shitkina IS. Revealing and considering common economic interests of group of companies (participants of a holding) when making major transactions and interested party transactions. Zakon. 2019;6:172-181. (In Russ.).

16. Slonov DS. Legal Barriers to the Application of the Doctrine of Substantive Consolidation in Bankruptcy Cases. Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2024;19(8):114-126. (In Russ.).

17. Sudebnye trendy — 2024: mneniya ekspertov i vazhnye keysy [Judicial trends — 2024: expert opinions and important cases]. Yuridicheskaya rabota v kreditnoy organizatsii [Legal Work in a Credit Organization]. 2024;4. Available at: https://futurebanking.ru/reglamentbank/article/8294 [Accessed 02.04.2025].

18. Sukhanov EA. Problems of codification of corporate and property law: Selected works. 2013–2017. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).

19. Vaskovskiy EV. Guide to the Interpretation and Application of Laws: For Novice Lawyers. Moscow: Brothers Bashmakovy Publ.; 913. (In Russ.).

20. Zhuykov MV. To the question of jurisprudence as a source of law. In: Judicial practice as a source of law. Moscow; 1997. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Shitkina I.S. The Significance of Judicial Practice in the Legal System of Russia: A Сritical Analysis of Judicial Acts in Corporate Disputes. Lex Russica. 2025;78(4):9-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.221.4.009-024

Views: 193


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)