A Special Status of the Judge's Decisions in Cases of Rendering Evidence as Inadmissible and Challenges of Reviewing their Legality and Validity
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.221.4.034-051
Abstract
The paper examines one of the problematic issues concerning the grounds and procedure provided for recognizing evidence as inadmissible and excluding it from the procedure of proving in a criminal case, as well as the review of the legality and validity of the decisions made. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation does not specify how evidence is recognized as inadmissible by the investigator, inquirer, or prosecutor. Part 3 of Article 88 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not provide a definitive answer to this question. The procedure for recognizing evidence as inadmissible and the procedural consequences of this decision are described more clearly for the stage of preliminary hearings. However, the procedure for reviewing and assessing such decisions for legality and validity is unsettled. For example, it is difficult to provide a clear answer in cases where a motion is filed in court to recognize evidence, previously deemed inadmissible in the preliminary hearing, as admissible, but the appellate instance leaves the judge’s decision unchanged. In this situation, the court considering the criminal case on its merits exceeds its authority. To resolve this and other contradictions, it is proposed to introduce rules that provide for the filing and consideration of motions to recognize evidence as inadmissible and exclude it from the evidentiary process no earlier than at the preparatory stage of the court session. However, the best option is a judicial inquiry immediately after the prosecution announces the order of evidence it intends to present. In light of this conclusion, it is proposed to make appropriate amendments and additions to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.
About the Author
V. S. BalakshinRussian Federation
Viktor S. Balakshin, Dr. Sci. (Law), Full Professor, professor, Department of Court’s Activity and Criminal Procedure
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Balakshin VS. Evidence in the Russian criminal procedure: substantive, procedural, information aspects. Russian Juridical Journal. 2008;6:139-143. (In Russ.).
2. Balakshin VS. Not bad for who?! Or on the question of inadmissibility of evidence. Rossijskaja Justicia. 2022;3:19-20. (In Russ.).
3. Balakshin VS. Po shchuchemu veleniyu. Zakonnost. 2012;4:8-14. (In Russ.).
4. Balakshin VS. Rendering the evidence collected in breach of the criminal procedure law requirements inadmissible and its exclusion from a criminal case. Russian Judge. 2018,1:38-45. (In Russ.).
5. Balakshin VS. Ugolovnoe presledovanie novykh lits v svyazi s vnov otkryvshimisya obstoyatelstvami [Criminal prosecution of new persons in connection with newly discovered circumstances]. Zakonnost. 2010;5:4.
6. Baranova MA, Grigoryan VL. Recognition of evidence inadmissible in court decisions in criminal cases: search for criteria. Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice. 2016;1(35):122-127. (In Russ.).
7. Dolya E. Origin of evidence in criminal proceedings. Zakonnost. 2016;10:70. (In Russ.).
8. Dorokhov VYa. Obshchee ponyatie dokazatelstva v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [The general concept of evidence in Soviet criminal proceedings]. Moscow; 1981. (In Russ.).
9. Kornakova SV. Evidence and Proof in Criminal Proceedings: Problems of Understanding their Nature. Lex Russica. 2023;76(1):98-109. (In Russ.).
10. Kozubenko YuV. Sources and system of criminal procedure law: criminal process: Proshlyakov AD, Balakshin VS, Kozubenko YuV (eds.). Moscow: Infotropic Media; 2016. (In Russ.).
11. Lazareva VA. Proof in criminal proceedings. 4th ed. Moscow: Yurait Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.).
12. Mikhailovskaya IB. The judge’s handbook on evidence in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2008. (In Russ.).
13. Orlov YuK. Fundamentals of the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Prospekt Publ., 2000. (In Russ.).
14. Orlov YuK. Problems of the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Yurist Publ.; 2009. (In Russ.).
15. Shafer S A. Evidence and proof in criminal cases: problems of theory and legal regulation. Moscow: Norma Publ., 2009. (In Russ.).
16. Skripov SV. Limits of the study of evidence by the court with the participation of jurors. Rossijskaja Justicia. 2022;3. (In Russ.).
17. Sutyagin KI. Grounds and procedural procedure for excluding inadmissible evidence in the course of pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Author’s Abstract. St. Petersburg, 2007. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Balakshin V.S. A Special Status of the Judge's Decisions in Cases of Rendering Evidence as Inadmissible and Challenges of Reviewing their Legality and Validity. Lex Russica. 2025;78(4):34-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.221.4.034-051