Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Guidelines for the Criminal Law Assessment of Actions Constituting Violent and Armed Hooliganism Need to be Adjusted

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.221.4.052-062

Abstract

The legislative expansion of the range of actions constituting hooliganism under criminal law in 2020 actualized issues related to determining the amount of harm constituting «violence» and admissibility of maintaining an expansive interpretation of the «armed» attribute given by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in relation to the previous version of Art. 213 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Given the severity of the sanctions of the norms on crimes against the person out of hooligan motives and hooliganism, the author classifies beatings and minor harm to health as violence. The paper proposes to limit mental violence in hooliganism with threats of murder or grievous bodily harm; arguments are made to change the approach to qualifying actions related to the use of violence that is not dangerous to life and health, in the process of resisting a representative of the authorities. The consolidation of violence among alternative mandatory elements of hooliganism and the transfer of armament to a qualified composition require a change in the law enforcement approach to determining armament by excluding the use of weapons in the process of hooliganism beyond the destruction of a living target, as well as promoting unsuitable, unloaded and fake weapons. Maintaining an expansive interpretation of this objective feature levels, in the author’s opinion, the differences between crime-forming and crime-differentiating elements of the composition of hooliganism. Significant changes to Art. 213 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and rules establishing responsibility for related corpus delicti objectify the need to adopt a new interpretive act.

About the Author

N. Yu. Skripchenko
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Russian Federation

Nina Yu. Skripchenko, Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Procedure

Arkhangelsk



References

1. Aistova LS. Khuliganstvo kak prestuplenie protiv lichnosti [Hooliganism as a crime against the person]. Kriminalist. 2010;1(6):34-38. (In Russ.).

2. Belov MN. Constituent elements of «hooliganism» in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: a tempol transformation. Russian Judge. 2021;10:25-28. (In Russ.).

3. Galimov IKh. Responsibility for robbery: questions of theory and practice. Russian Investigator. 2003;10:32-34. (In Russ.).

4. Ilyichev VA. Imperfection of criminal law reduces the effectiveness of the fight against crime. Pravo i politika. 2005;10:115-117. (In Russ.).

5. Ivanov NG, Kosyrev II. Modern metamorphosis of criminal hooliganism. Rossijskaja Justicia. 2008;1:34-38. (In Russ.).

6. Ivanov NG. Hooliganism as a crime: a critical view. State and Law. 2009;6:53-61. (In Russ.).

7. Ivantsova N. The prospect of hooliganism is its decriminalization. Zakonnost. 2004;11:37-40. (In Russ.).

8. Kashepov VP. On guarantees of criminal legal protection of personal security. Journal of Russian Law. 2005;12:105-118. (In Russ.).

9. Kashepov VP. On the features of modern criminal law making. Journal of Russian Law. 2005;4:74-87. (In Russ.).

10. Kharlamov DD. Debating issues of qualification of hooliganism. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law. 2022;6:82-100. (In Russ.).

11. Kolokolov NA. The fight against hooliganism: the crisis of legal regulation. Russian Investigator. 2004;11:18-24. (In Russ.).

12. Korin IS. On the forensic interpretation of the concept of the use of firearms. Russian Investigator. 2014;10:3-6. (In Russ.).

13. Kruglikov LL, Vasilevsky AV. Differentiation of responsibility in criminal law. St. Petersburg: Legal Center-Press; 2002. (In Russ.).

14. Rarog AI. Binding Nature of Clarifications from the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(5):104-112. (In Russ.).

15. Sidorenko EL. Armed hooliganism: paradoxes of criminalization. Obshchestvo i parvo. 2015;1(51):69-72. (In Russ.).

16. Volzhenkin BV. Decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court on judicial practice in criminal cases of hooliganism and other crimes committed out of hooligan motives. Criminal Law. 2008;1:25. (In Russ.).

17. Volzhenkin BV. Hooliganism. Criminal Law. 2007;5:17-22. (In Russ.).

18. Zhadyaeva MA, Yanina IYu. Public danger of «violent» and «armed» hooliganism: problems of legislative technology and law enforcement. Russian Judge. 2022;2:21-26. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Skripchenko N.Yu. Guidelines for the Criminal Law Assessment of Actions Constituting Violent and Armed Hooliganism Need to be Adjusted. Lex Russica. 2025;78(4):52-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.221.4.052-062

Views: 53


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)