Philosophical and Legal Aspects of Criminal Liability Measures in the Sphere of Expression of Religious Beliefs and Attitudes towards Religion in Russia

The study correlates the norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation governing relations as to the expression of religious beliefs and attitudes towards religion in the context of the socio-cultural foundations of the processes to which these norms apply. It is shown that over the past 30 years, legislation in this area has undergone changes in the direction from a literal interpretation of the principles of a secular society to confessional-oriented preferences. The paper presents the arguments of supporters and opponents of these transformations of law in the articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, designed to protect believers and their shrines from attacks. It is proved that this measure, which distinguishes subjects of religiosity and objects of their veneration into a specially protected group, only partially corresponds to the stated goal. In fact, state coercion measures are being introduced into the system of interaction between subjects of religious life, representatives of religion and secular society in order to strengthen government control over the sphere of religious relations. The ideas of overcoming excesses in this area are criticized not only by means of multi-stage legal regulation of the sphere of religious relations, but also by improving the norms of law in the direction of «positive» or «negative» censorship (discrimination). Each of these methods has its own significant drawbacks and can be regarded as a dead end. Perhaps a balanced state policy in this area lies apart from the tightening of punitive measures for the expression of religious beliefs, and from condoning permissiveness of forms of expression of attitudes towards religion, fraught with social conflicts.

1. Abramov A. The fight against defamation of religions in UN resolutions. Zhurnal Moskovskoy patriarkhii i Tserkovnyy vestnik. 2011;6. Available at: http://e-vestnik.ru/world/borba_protiv_diffamatsii_3151/. (In Russ.).

2. Bidova BB. Analysis of the issues of combating religious extremism: Comparative legal analysis. Nauka bez granits. 2017;5(10):45-49. (In Russ.).

3. Ermakova TN, Petukhov KV. Criminal law protection of freedom of conscience and religion in Russia and foreign countries. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015;3:70-75. (In Russ.).

4. Gamidov RT. Legislative experience in countering terrorist activities (using the example of a number of countries). Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve. Yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2016;7:28-32. (In Russ.).

5. Gavrilov EO. Modern religiosity as a representative and factor of social development: A monograph. Novokuznetsk: Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.).

6. Gavrilov OF, Gavrilov EO, Zhukova OI. Christian Theological Discourse in Modern Russia: Application areas, current issues. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kultura. 2023;3:23-31. (In Russ.).

7. Gladilin AV. «Hate speech» as communication. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem. 2012;11(19). (In Russ.).

8. Khulap V. German criminal law in the field of religion: History and current discussions. Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2017;2:150-171. (In Russ.).

9. Korolev AS. On the issue of amendments to Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Obrazovanie i pravo. 2019;3:153-156. (In Russ.).

10. Koval EA. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights on countering hate speech in the context of glocalization. Gumanitarnye i politiko-pravovye issledovaniya. 2020;1(8):13-25. (In Russ.).

11. Lebedev VM, et al. Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In 4 volumes. Vol. 2: The Special part. Sections VII–VIII. Lebedev VM, editor. Moscow: Yurait Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

12. Lebedev VM, et al. Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In 4 volumes. Vol. 4: The special part. Sections XI–XII. Lebedev VM, editor. Moscow: Yurait Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

13. Lektorsky VA. Activity-based approach: Beginning and prospects. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2008;1(75):13-16. (In Russ.).

14. Lektorsky VA. The activity approach: Death or rebirth? Voprosy filosofii. 2001;2:56-65. (In Russ.).

15. Naumenko TV. Activity-based approach as an explanatory principle of modern social philosophy. Zhurnalnyy klub Intelros «Credo New». 2013;1. Available at: https://intelros.ru/readroom/credo_new/k1-2013/18496-deyatelnostnyy-podhod-kak-obyasnitelnyy-princip-sovremennoy-socialnoy-filosofii.html. (In Russ.).

16. Osokin RB, Kokorev VG. The principle of justice and equality as a criterion for evaluating and improving Article 148 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation «Violation of the right to freedom of conscience and religion». Philosophy of Law. 2017;4(83):111-116. (In Russ.).

17. Pogasiy AK. Metamorphoses of Russian legislation on freedom of conscience: From lawmaking to law enforcement. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. 2016;4:176-179. (In Russ.).

18. Shtekl K. The approach of the Russian Orthodox Church to the issue of human rights. Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2014;3(32):146-165. (In Russ.).

19. Shtykova ER. The concept of «extremist crimes»: Difficulties in interpreting the legislative definition. Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal. 2019;8(1):371-374. (In Russ.).

20. Silantev SA. Conflicts of norms of criminal and administrative law on responsibility for insulting religious feelings of believers: Causes, manifestations, ways of overcoming. Evraziyskoe nauchnoe obedinenie. 2020;1-2(59):143-147. (In Russ.).

21. Smirnov AM. The establishment of criminal liability for insulting the religious feelings of believers as an example of the legislator’s disregard for the theory of criminalization of acts. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii [Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin]. 2019;4(129):211-217. (In Russ.).

22. Stromov VYu. The system of criminal penalties in the criminal family of religious law on the example of modern Muslim states. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki» [Tambov University Review. The Humanities Series]. 2012;9(113):401-411. (In Russ.).

23. Temperman D. Freedom of expression and religious feelings in pluralistic societies: Problem of extreme statements. Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2013;2(31):12-39. (In Russ.).

24. Zaytsev IA. Criminal law and administrative law methods of protecting the constitutional right to freedom of conscience and religion under the legislation of the Russian Federation and some CIS countries. Vestnik Omskoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2018;15(4):497-501. (In Russ.).